Kind of looks like the author of the article.
Are they breaking away from Blackrock?
They own more stock of Walmart than Blackrock does.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/060416/top-4-walmart-shareholders-wmt.asp
*Which could cause major changes to society.
It's not very clear what's happening in the image. In addition, a 3D mixed media installation, when he is known best for straight graffiti art?
The fridge goes. It's that simple.
She's seems to be trying to appeal to Hollywood. Most likely she is angling for a role in a Marvel film. I can't think of any other explanation.
Honestly though, who wants to drive a truck named TuRD?
You can not unsee what I have said.
Playing First Person Shooters on OnLive was like steering a boat.
502 Bad Gateway
It's important to note that we are not actually having a conversation. Text is interpreted differently to spoken word in the brain. All of your assumptions are things you have read into the text. Text that was not meant for you.
You can see why I am confused by your statement, context of the royals aside.
On the contrary. I don't think you are confused at all.
Do you actually think the Royal family is good? Do you think your parents are going to live forever? Do you think a family home has more then 8 bedrooms?
Reminder, I'm replying to someone who thinks getting married, relinquishing a corrupt monarchy and having children, is "Getting some tail".
So, your interjections on the possibility of a healthy generational family isn't really relevant here is it? Nor are you're assumption of my beliefs.
Maybe you don't have kids. If that’s the case, then I’m sorry for you.
You think getting married and having kids is "getting tail". You're understanding of relationships is that of a child's.
You think getting married, and having kids is "getting some tail". I can stress enough your incomparable ignorance. His children take precedence over his parents, as well as the title, prestige and wealth that comes along with it.
So choose your Mother over your wife and kids? Sure thing Momma's boy.
Just so you're aware.
Blood of the covenant is thicker than water of the womb.
It means to leave your family, and to create your own.
Everyone renounces their family for their new life with their wives and kids. It's literately the point of marriage.
“It wasn’t that big of a deal,” she said. “And Leonard wasn’t shy at all! In the middle of shooting, I just completely forgot I didn’t have clothes on.”
They are seeking damages “believed to be in excess of $500 million.”
What damages?
Your title implies American's embracing American ideals is wrong, where as the video is about WEF controlled forced diversity.
I'll give you this much. TITS!
You will often find that tone is not readable in modern text communications, and that emotions are actually being read into by the observer. Or as often projected onto, to sway a conversation.
To be honest, I can't even say if I was even annoyed by anything taking place in this thread. Though it was an amusing quagmire to try and unravel.
OH, I'm a guy alright. And there is no reason to be sorry, or Politically Correct about any of this. I however do see things differently from most everyone here in this thread, as it's all just background noise and propaganda for the personal gain of others.
To me, this is all false outrage for aggregate tracking and political means, either to gain traction on a pointless false narrative or to further division. It's tits on a bull to me. And I'm just here trying to point that out to anyone that will listen.
And there are even large muscular Chinese men. But they are the outliers. Now read through all my replies in this thread and ask yourself, Is the image on the right really something created for a modern audience? Does it offend or disgust you? Is it actually notable in any way what so ever? And most importantly of all, what was the actual point of this thread and this topic? /\/\
Well thank God we introed this new version of the character having banged She-Hulk.
Hey Kids! wanna find out if he goes back for seconds?
Wow. That was awful. Please don't ever do that to me again.
Now you look at this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93-_r0w7ykI
You actually find the depiction on the right to be "uglier" than the other 3 images? Am I getting this straight? And the general consensus is that the breast size is the deciding factor in her attractiveness?
Its being done to make games appeal more to people who don't actually play them
Right. Because to drive sales you create unattractive characters, and small breasts= ugly? Got it.
I'm sorry. There isn't actually anything here we can debate. As, none of that makes any sense to me. In my book, you don't even know what a game is. Hint: it involves game play! And Square Enix is not a game developer. And they don't actual make "games".
Marvelous! Your attention to detail is lost on me however.
With their overlapping investments in each other,? You could have fooled me.