Also if you made your own game they'd mass-report you and get whatever you made blacklisted for not being full of nogs, like they tried to do to Kingdom Come: Deliverance.
Saying only one race can make fictional content about certain people is flat out racist
Funny that some woke faggot is saying that - the first Assassin's Creed game had what might literally have been the first 'diversity disclaimer' on the unskippable splash screens, saying "This game was made by a diverse team", because it was about killing Arabs.
The woke cries out in pain as it strikes you.
I for one am shocked that someone who looks like the owner of a massage parlor would be running a human trafficking operation.
I have no idea what that is but I have a feeling that's a good thing and the less I know, the better.
If you think it's still "cat ladies" you're very out of date. Designer breeds has made doodle dogs insanely popular with dried up lonely women.
It's hardly a replacement when that was literally the only movie with X23. Hugh Jackman wanted to quit being the Wolverine so he needed a sendoff and Logan was a great way to do it.
How does a character 'take over' when that was literally the only movie with X23, never to return, except Hugh Jackman is back as Wolverine?
I mean, Logan was basically that trope, but it was also phenomenal and one of the best superhero movies.
I'm glad they took creative liberties. A lot of great scenes in the movies are dumb as fuck in the books and the books are full of laboriously boring endless meandering unfocused nonsense that goes on for pages.
The entire battle in the Chamber of Mazarbul is, I think, literally all of a page and a half. Weathertop is 3/4 of one page (EDIT: I asked ChatGPT and it said Weathertop was more detailed, so I may have it backwards).
The troll only puts his foot in the door and Frodo stabs it and it fucks off and is never seen again.
They're all worrying and Gandalf is holding the door, and then they go 'Oh there's another exit' and they just... leave. It honest to god felt like one of those shitty radio plays or old Republic Serials, where they end every episode on a major cliffhanger, and then the next episode resolves the cliffhanger in an incredibly unsatisfying way. You see the heroes get on their space ship and fly away and then it explodes into pieces. The narrator says "Kazzak's ray beam just struck the space ship and it exploded into a million pieces! This is the end of our heroes!" and then the next episode begins with a scene the audience didn't see of Spaceboy and Wunderman strapping on jetpacks and jumping out, and then the ship explodes behind them.
In this case, "Oh no! Our heroes are in a dead end and the orcs of Moria are on the march! What happens next!" and then in the next episode there's just a back door nobody mentioned or saw before, and they just leave.
That's it. That's the whole battle. There's an actual line that stuck with me, and it's "Aragorn and Boromir slew many." I'm pretty sure that's the line word for word. Their big life-or-death battle deep in the Mines of Moria and Tolkien's descriptive prowess could only go as far as "[they] slew many."
I could just picture Tolkien packing a pipe and going, "Fill in the blanks yourself you fuckwits, I didn't have time to paint you a word picture because I was busy spending nine pages describing the foliage in Lothlorien."
The books are full of imagination and wonderment and has great ideas but I'll be honest, Tolkien was a completely dogshit author. I read the book as a kid, saw the movies, and then read the books again, and I'm gonna be real - Jackson did the entire thing better than Tolkien in every way. Cutting out trash like the Barrow Wights and Tom Bombadil made the story better.
Even Tolkien never bothered to explain Tom Bombadil, and he wrote the fucking thing.
Because it's about angry revenge fantasies from the filthskins on the group they know are their Betters.
Ay Tone...
If you want to know how fucking stupid Libertariansim is, essentially they will argue that the government mandating something is bad, but a company with government-like powers ala BlackRock mandating something is MuH fReE mArKeT jUsT mAkE yOuR oWn TrIlLiOn DoLlAr AsSeT mAnAgEmEnT cOmPaNy BrO
It makes sense since it takes all of like seven seconds to realize that libertarians are just money-grubbing shekel-whores who want to sit around getting high all day and doing fuck-all anything productive.
It's why they gaslight continuously about cryptocurrency, which is essentially literally just a way to turn entropy into money, that provides no value to the world. Countless terawatts of power have been burned, millions of GPUs toasted and landfilled, just to solve fake math equations that they can store on a server and claim is worth money. All of that real effort pissed away on something that is essentially imaginary.
Ask them if they'd be fine if it was made impossible to turn crypto into fiat currency and they'd lose their minds, because they know that crypto is just about stealing other people's investment, and has essentially fuck-all to do with the gay principles of 'anonymity' that doesn't even exist and probably never did.
I'm libertarian at the core
Do you support banning guns from Marxist, criminalizing Marxist thought and suppressing all Marxist politics?
If you don't, that means you're actively supporting the takeover of Marxism. Your principles are shit. Marxists will fucking kill you and this is why Libertarianism is the political version of how "pacifism" is just self-righteous cowards patting themselves on the back and pretending their weakness is a virtue.
Found the lolbert traitor.
If someone sent explosives to terrorists, you'd call them a terrorist. Libertarians want to put guns in the hands of Marxists. Therefore they are Marxists. You said they were the "opposite"? Let's make a list.
They think Marxists should be free to spread Marxist thoughts. This directly support the Marxist cancer. That's unacceptable.
They think Marxists should be free to speak and vote. This directly empowers Marxist takeovers. That's unacceptable.
They think Marxists should be given fair and free trials. This directly supports Marxists escaping justice. That's unacceptable.
Marxists themselves don't even believe that Libertarians should have these rights.
Marxists support open borders. Libertarians support open borders. Libertarians are Marxists.
Marxists want Marxists to be heavily armed. Libertarians want Marxists to be heavily armed. Libertarians are Marxists.
Marxists support medical mandates. Libertarians support medical mandates. Libertarians are Marxists.
Marxists support an anarchy state. Libertarians support an anarchy state. Libertarians are Marxists.
Marxists support gender-bending open-air faggotry. Libertarians support gender-bending open-air faggotry. Libertarians are Marxists.
Marxists support widespread access to life-ruining society-dissolving recreational drugs. Libertarians support widespread access to life-ruining society-dissolving recreational drugs. Libertarians are Marxists.
lmao you said they were the 'opposite' and yet I find a dozen major policies they share.
Marxists outright want to ban speech, ban guns, ban political dissent, and ban any semblance of a fair justice system. Yet Libertarians actively support their efforts to seize power and implement their vision. Why would they do that? Because they're Marxists.
If you aren't actively supporting the total liquidation of Marxists, you are a Marxist sympathizer, thus just like someone who provides material aid to terrorists, you are a Marxist by proxy.
Everything about Libertarianism is just liberal faggotry. It's even in the goddamn name. They can fucking die. "Libertarian" is just the skinsuit Marxists wear to infiltrate the right, and based on the comments I saw on X on the last few days, people are waking up to what a bunch of faggots libertarians are.
Much like how "pacifists" are just cowards patting themselves on the back, "Libertarians" are just Marxists pretending they have 'freedumb' principles.
That's a big thing for me. Assassin's Creed (though I haven't played most) are like Forrest Gump and the point is you play a historical nobody rubbing elbows with famous people.
For the first time they're desperate to put in a """"real"""" historical figure in Yasuke, and the only reason seems to be because Yasuke was probably a N.
Actually that's a fun point. "Assassin's Creed doesn't use real people as protagonists so yasuke isn't real."
That is literally one whole post, too. No foolin
Thus, my meme. "No."
WHAT KILLED THE DINOSAURS?
THE ICE AGE!
Is that supposed to be Nora?
This guy's manner of speech is so infuriatingly annoying I want to drown his family in acid and make him watch. Why does he fucking talk like that? It's like every other word has a fruity inflection and it sounds like he's splicing multiple takes across even one sentence so there's a weird uptalking tone emphasized on random words for no reason.
Fuck this dumb bitch and her fatherless family of turdlets. First how fucking stupid do you have to be to confuse a live clam with a seashell?
Second even if it was a simple mistake, 70+? What did they plan to do with 70+ seashells? Throw them away, that's what. That's typical bean behavior to steal and ruin everything for yourself under the shit third world belief that everything is infinite until it isn't.
They knocked down the fine because she did their bidding and shat out 5 new invaders of the right complexion.
How many times does it mention Israel?