13
PepesCovfefe 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is good advice. What are some strategies for doing what you said “you always put them at a disadvantage; always consider a situation tactically”?

5
PepesCovfefe 5 points ago +5 / -0

I get the principle of it, but why didn’t Crowder just debate the other person and destroy them?

1
PepesCovfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you listened this this? It’s impossible to argue that the vaccine is not quantifiably extremely dangerous. At best one could say that the detrimental side effects are not intentional. Calling them “mildly harmful” is an understatement:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/TH2HAmTp40xq/

3
PepesCovfefe 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ll take it even a step further and say that these people are so brainwashed that the MSM narrative could shift to “yes the vaccine caused sterilization, but this is a GOOD THING in light of climate change and overpopulation”, and that these sheep will not only accept their sterilization, but welcome it.

1
PepesCovfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

When do you think the side effects will be so obvious that it can no longer be considered a good idea to get the vaccine, and everyone will regret having gotten it? I’m familiar with Weinstein’s discussion and try to get everyone to watch it. From what they’re discussing, it seems like we already have enough evidence not to get it! This is the one I am referring to:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/TH2HAmTp40xq/

4
PepesCovfefe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks; that’s a good take, and I agree with it.

Given everything that’s happened over the last 18 months and how I’ve lost trust in everything, I can’t help but analyze what they could potentially be up to next - thus my posting this.

2
PepesCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I briefly read about Marek’s; makes sense with the highest prevalence of vaccine mechanism after the ovaries occurring in bone marrow.

So, does that mean those of us that don’t get the bad will be culled from the intensifying virulence of the virus you mentioned?

Edit: *vaccine, not bad - typo

1
PepesCovfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

They could find it desirable to immediately eliminate all the people that are awake, and therefore won’t take the vaccine, in one swift event, leaving the remaining 65% to dwindle gradually overtime acting as the workers that transition the economy to the Great Reset.

2
PepesCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry to hear that. We can choose are friends, not our family.

Try listening to Jesse Lee Peterson. He talks a lot about ending relationships with toxic family members.

3
PepesCovfefe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for sharing. Good news is it already seems you are not destined to fall in his footsteps. What was his dad (your grandfather) like?

5
PepesCovfefe 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m sorry to hear that.

Hope you start you’re own family so you can still celebrate the day.

2
PepesCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shit like this just makes me more committed to total abstinence from pop culture: movies, tv shows, music, art, etc.

Anyone have a comment on the similarity and differences between our separation from pop culture vs. prior generations aka “not relating to the youth”?

1
PepesCovfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why don’t we just drop rainbows on all of them so it looks like they got money and no one gives more

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›