2
NikolaiVsevolodovich 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where do you live? The Yukon?

I buy oreos all the time and they're less than 4 bucks, sometimes even less. Unless you went for the gluten free oreos.. Those are like 8 bucks, which is insane lmao

Everything did the "shrinkflation" and cookies have been pull top for a while now

But yeah, it's shit. We're spending literally like 5k more a year on groceries compared to two years ago. And if anything our eating habits have changed in the direction of trying to spend less through more affordable meals.

Sucks.

0
NikolaiVsevolodovich 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's an effective way to consolidate multiple pages of information and put it into a quickly digestible form. It's nothing more than a search engine. I could have posted links but then troglodytes like you would complain about having to click links.

The statement I quoted is wrong. There is a viral element for some cancers. You can choose to ignore the grok.

-4
NikolaiVsevolodovich -4 points ago +1 / -5

Moreover, cancer isn't a fucking virus.

There are people who believe cancers are related to virii

Grok: The theory that cancer is caused by a viral infection suggests that certain viruses may trigger or contribute to the development of specific cancers by altering cellular processes. While not all cancers are viral, some viruses are known to play a role in oncogenesis. Here's a concise overview based on current knowledge:

  • Oncoviruses: Certain viruses, like Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), Hepatitis B and C (HBV/HCV), and Human T-cell Lymphotropic Virus (HTLV-1), are linked to cancers. For example, HPV is strongly associated with cervical cancer, EBV with lymphomas, and HBV/HCV with liver cancer. These viruses can integrate into host DNA, disrupt tumor suppressor genes (e.g., p53 or Rb), or cause chronic inflammation, leading to uncontrolled cell growth.

  • Mechanism: Viruses may promote cancer by:

    • Inserting oncogenes into host cells.
    • Disrupting cell cycle regulation.
    • Causing chronic inflammation or immune suppression, creating an environment conducive to cancer development.
  • Evidence:

    • HPV vaccines have reduced cervical cancer rates, supporting a viral link.
    • EBV is detected in ~90% of Burkitt’s lymphoma cases in endemic regions.
    • HBV/HCV infections increase liver cancer risk by 20-100 times compared to uninfected individuals.
  • Limitations of the Theory: Not all cancers are linked to viruses. Most cancers arise from a combination of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors (e.g., smoking, UV exposure, or random mutations). Only about 10-15% of global cancer cases are estimated to be virus-associated.

  • Historical Context: The idea dates back to the early 20th century when researchers like Francis Peyton Rous discovered the Rous sarcoma virus, which causes tumors in chickens, earning a Nobel Prize in 1966. This sparked interest in viral oncogenesis, though the broader "cancer is a virus" theory oversimplifies the disease.

  • Current View: Cancer is multifactorial, and while viruses are a significant cause in some cases, they are not a universal explanation. Research continues into other potential viral links (e.g., possible associations with breast or prostate cancer), but no definitive evidence supports a singular viral cause for all cancers

1
NikolaiVsevolodovich 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to mention:

Tulsi Gabbard, as Director of National Intelligence, stated during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on March 25, 2025, that the U.S. intelligence community assesses Iran is not currently building a nuclear weapon and that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program suspended in 2003. She noted, however, that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is at unprecedented levels for a non-nuclear-weapons state and that public discussions in Iran about nuclearization have increased, potentially emboldening advocates within the regime.

https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-iran-nuclear-weapon-2051523

https://jewishinsider.com/2025/03/gabbard-iran-is-not-currently-developing-nuclear-weapons

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-threatens-iran-over-nukes-dni-gabbard-claims-tehran-not-building-bombs

5
NikolaiVsevolodovich 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't even need to necessarily stage it.. They have plenty of enemies.

They just need to allow it to happen, like they did on oct7

1
NikolaiVsevolodovich 1 point ago +1 / -0

But more right than the cons is PPC. I said in another post I looked up where I live and PPC actually had a good turn out last election, like near what the ndp got.

I know what you're saying though. I like what one of the other posters said, in that if PC is pretty much guaranteed to win your riding then vote with your conscience, not strategically.

1
NikolaiVsevolodovich 1 point ago +1 / -0

My riding is ~90% guaranteed to go PC. PPC got nearly 10% in 2021, but is projected much less this round.. But I don't really trust polls and the projections much. I know I've never been polled.

2
NikolaiVsevolodovich 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think there's an element where he has to pander to them, given how many there are now. At least I hope so.

2
NikolaiVsevolodovich 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, and AFAIK the cons also voted unanimously for gender affirming care, and shit like taking kids away from parents who won't trans their kids.

That and the PC party kicking out MPs who have called out the mass graves hoax for what it is - a hoax. Because it's too divisive, or not politically expedient. I don't want people who think in those ways.

I think he has the right idea in terms of the economy (minus the pajeet influx) in terms of opening regulations and harnessing our vast resources.

8
NikolaiVsevolodovich 8 points ago +8 / -0

No one fully represents me but me. So with that said I'm left to choose who appears to represent me the most.

1
NikolaiVsevolodovich 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huh, never came across that place when looking at the trending communities while on the Donald. This communities.win or scored place confuses me. It's like there's little hidey holes all over that are connected but not at the same time.

Thanks for the link/clarification

1
NikolaiVsevolodovich 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a lot of channels on youtube that totally blow my mind that they're allowed.

And I see "antisemitic" comments everywhere.

0
NikolaiVsevolodovich 0 points ago +1 / -1

What's the evidence that he's controlled opposition?

That the Bobbies are doing all this shit to him because they believe it'll force more compliance, rather than rally the natives to fight back more?

4
NikolaiVsevolodovich 4 points ago +4 / -0

What weather event does drinking Christian child blood bring about?

2
NikolaiVsevolodovich 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yeah there's a huge dissonance with a lot of people

"we need to get these jew haters out!"

have you ever considered for a second why they're here, and why they hate jews for even just a second? You ever consider that if we hadn't RUINED their home and country at the behest of Israel, that they wouldn't have had to come here as refugees? Ever consider that geniuses? Ever consider that sort of shit is the basis for their hatred?

Many people hate their boss. But their boss isn't bombing the shit out of their family, why is it wrong to hate the people who are??

4
NikolaiVsevolodovich 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't be so convinced carney is guaranteed to win.

That said polievre talks a big talk, but realistically the PC party isn't that much different, plus the way our system works he wouldn't be able to walk in and start flipping tables like Trump has.

21
NikolaiVsevolodovich 21 points ago +21 / -0

I love how here in Canada we still have labour shortages despite nearing 7% unemployment.

And the msm will say but but but we have labour shortages in specific skilled areas!

But then we import "refugees" and literal unskilled pajeets who are scamming the system and being scammed too, and I just see them taking over all the unskilled jobs that could be going to our youth, shit like stocking shelves.

It's all a fucking scam. I'm really surprised to see the same script being followed there since it seemed to me like they were keeping globohomo at bay

9
NikolaiVsevolodovich 9 points ago +9 / -0

I saw someone on X in the Tim fool post saying that the white kids apparently jumped the black kid a week earlier or some shit like that 🤣

There's so much poison in the water around this. Black people Twitter is 100% fully in lock step around Karmelon, even the ones who want to pretend to be like some sort of rational skeptic frame everything around the presumption that he's innocent or was somehow justified.

Yeah bros, a key piece of evidence is gonna come negating the like 20 witness testimonies so far that's going to justify stabbing him in the heart. Makes total sense.

I was sort of sad to see Bryson Gray going so hard in the paint defending the black kid and then trying to argue stats and making a massive fool of himself. I've heard him on a few podcasts and he seemed an alright pretty based kinda guy.. But yeah tribalism..

Then again here's me without a tribe at all because everything is fake and gay.

22
NikolaiVsevolodovich 22 points ago +22 / -0

I fucking hate the jeets and the fuckers who don't bathe for weeks who stink up Walmart while they take their worthless college degree that won't mean shit when papa Patel hires them at Wendy's no white kid can get a job at anymore

But for real, at this point those fucks are getting played, and played by their own, and our corrupt ass governments who steal their life savings so they can come over here for a new life, meanwhile they just make enclaves anyway so fuck them

Take a fucking shower and stop bathing in your own shit and go home.

view more: Next ›