8
Mystiker 8 points ago +10 / -2

On ConsumeProduct maybe, but definitely not on KiA2, the mods here are complete Jew-worshipping cucks.

2
Mystiker 2 points ago +4 / -2

Domitius loves to shut down legitimate conversations and ban people who didn't break the rules, he has said that his goal is to prevent these sorts of topics on KiA2.

So you will get much better answers if you ask this question on ConsumeProduct, which doesn't censor these sorts of topics.

1
Mystiker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nope, we don't have the technology. It won't be ready for many many years, and it will be extremely heavily regulated and controlled even when it does exist.

There's also no guarantee that it will lead to babies that are healthy, nature is very difficult to replicate with technology.

So you need a backup plan, something that works now, not 50-100 years from now.

ConPro, mainly. That place is full of simps who think if they make the Holocaust happen, they will get their loving blonde tradwife.

I have seen a few simps on ConPro, sure, but I always call out their bullshit, and they tend to get downvoted. I see far more people calling out women on ConPro than I do people simping for women.

1
Mystiker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Feminist women created a bioweapon specifically targeted at you, they want to kill you, and the best you can come up with is "muh tradcuckery is best".

Okay cool, so what's your solution? I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, but whether you like it or not we need women in order to make babies in order to keep society from collapsing and going extinct.

So having a system where women are kept on a short leash, where they have no power and are submissive to men, is the best way to achieve that goal. That strategy has worked successfully for many thousands of years, it has led to the greatest civilizations in the world.

The far right are massive simping cucks, their whole ideology is based around simping and pretending women's nature was modified by the Jews, rather than organically revealing itself as the world become more developed.

I have no idea which "far right" people you talk to, but I know quite a few "far right" people, and they are very aware of female nature. They don't believe that women were brainwashed by Jews, they believe that the Jews simply unleashed women's innate desires by giving women freedom and removing the old traditions. Considering the very high percentage of Jews within the feminist movement, their viewpoint has some validity to it.

It was easier for them to advocate genocide than to criticise women. How much more cucked can you be?

Once again, I have no idea which "far right" people you are talking to, you seem to be confusing them with the neocon cuckservatives.

1
Mystiker 1 point ago +2 / -1

False equivalence, false dichotomy. Traditional men don't want to "give everything women want", they want women to be submissive and obedient to men, they want women to have no political power. Look at how White men acted 100 years ago, they knew women's place. You are confusing traditional men with neocons (who are not traditional at all).

Your "us vs them" mentality is retarded, there are many different types of people on the Right, with different beliefs, not everybody is a retarded simp cuckservative. In fact the very far right neo-Nazis are rarely simps, it's usually the moderate right who are the simping m'lady cucks.

8
Mystiker 8 points ago +9 / -1

They sure are silent about the Holodomor, aren't they? Also the Armenian Genocide.

0
Mystiker 0 points ago +1 / -1

And yes, the idea of an eternal race war for racial and ethnic dominance is a very old argument that is still adopted by the Alt-Right, White Nationalists, but stems at least as far back as Judeo-Bolshevism.

Okay, but once again: where did I state or imply that in my post? You are literally banning my posts because of things that other people said, not things I said. That is an extreme injustice which is not tolerated in any sane society.

Why are you trying to create the precedent that it's okay to ban people for things they never said? That it's okay to ban people who did not violate any rules? Why are you trying to normalize collective group guilt and false accusations? How does that make you any better than the Alt-Right or the Neo-Nazis?

If you're going to be the type of moderator who abuses their power and bans people for no reason, then you will find your sub quickly dead and people will move over to better subs.

8
Mystiker 8 points ago +9 / -1

Exactly right, the purpose of the petition is to make all the leftoids seethe. The more signatures it gets, the more they seethe.

0
Mystiker 0 points ago +2 / -2

So you can read my mind now? Where in my post did I say that "Jews dominate positions of power across the world to win and dominate in an international race war against all other people"? It wasn't even implied in my post, or in the context. I only talked about the vaccine, in a thread that is about vaccines in Israel.

Also, you say "the sites they come from", but the things I posted are from Jewish Contributions, Jewish National Fund, and The Times of Israel, which are all Jewish sources. So you're saying Jewish websites are anti-Semitic?!

So Jester can post all sorts of stupid crap, but when I make a post that doesn't violate the rules you ban it anyways, based on something I didn't even say, because apparently you can read my mind. That's blatant moderator abuse.

2
Mystiker 2 points ago +3 / -1

How is it an identity attack for me to point out that the CEOs of vaccine companies are Jewish, and therefore it's natural for them to have an involvement with the Israeli government? This clearly doesn't violate rule 16.

2
Mystiker 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's almost like humans have instincts which cause them to want to reproduce their genes. Something something evolution.

1
Mystiker 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's not my fault that a lot of Jews do bad things. Are you claiming that if I attack some Jews (who do bad things) that's the same as attacking all Jews?

You are attacking Bobby Fischer and Eric Clopper, who are both Jews. So according to your logic, you are now an anti-Semitic stormcuck who hates all Jews and wants to murder all Jews. Why do you hate Jews so much?

According to your link...

In short, the synagogue of Satan was a group of unbelieving Jews who were persecuting Christians. These groups were guilty of slandering the church in Smyrna and opposing the church in Philadelphia in some way. The majority of the persecution the New Testament church faced came from the Jewish community. Even most of the Roman persecution was an effort to appease the Jewish authorities.

Oh, I see, so the synagogue of Satan was a bunch of Jews who were hating and torturing Christians. Thanks for letting me know!

-1
Mystiker -1 points ago +1 / -2

Jester is a Jew, of course he has the flag of Israel on his wall. No it's not a joke, Jester constantly defends Israel from any criticism (including legitimate criticism).

0
Mystiker 0 points ago +1 / -1

But Jester isn't on ConPro, he's here. So if we're going to discuss Jester, surely it should be on here, correct?

1
Mystiker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Please point to a single one of my posts where I hated ALL Jews. You are the one making the accusation against me, so you must provide the proof. I do not need to defend myself until after you present the proof.

I want citations on the Rabbis part.

In my previous posts I gave you verses from the Bible which showed it. I'm sorry that your attention span is so short, but I won't repeat myself. You can go back and re-read my posts if you like.

1
Mystiker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why would I squirm? It is common knowledge that Jesus was a Jew, that the apostles were Jews, and Paul was a Jew. The Bible was written by Jewish Christians (who were hated and tortured and murdered by the Jewish rabbis).

As I already explained to you, I do not hate all Jews. I love Bobby Fischer and Eric Clopper. I only hate bad people, regardless of their ethnicity.

The King James Bible was written in 1611, and it does indeed contain Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9. However, the KJV is not the earliest Bible.

The book of Revelation was written in 95 AD, and it was written in Greek. The book of Revelation is not a part of Judaism at all, it is exclusively Christian. In fact all of the New Testament is exclusively Christian.

1
Mystiker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Literally every version, it's in Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9.

4
Mystiker 4 points ago +6 / -2

They're not, they are a separate ethnic group (related to Arabs) which can be distinguished via DNA testing.

They are a desert people from the Levant who trace their ancestry back to Abraham.

They just like to pretend to be White when it's convenient to them.

5
Mystiker 5 points ago +8 / -3

That's a very good question. Jester has singlehandedly caused more drama and problems than anybody else here. His posts are always heavily downvoted, it's clear that the community doesn't want him here. He's also certainly made far more false reports than anybody else, wasting our moderator's time.

4
Mystiker 4 points ago +5 / -1

I don't know, but quite a long time. He used to troll on OAG and BitChute comments, and he still trolls on DSOGaming. He's all over the place. I assume that he's unemployed and leeching off of welfare or something, he spends so much time online.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›