Yes, it is. And in that 50 second clip, he says several things.

I’m deeply saddened by violence too, but where he and I disagree is that I don’t think any gun deaths are worth it to protect 2A rights.

I don’t see any celebration in OP’s post

I’m not saying he supported political violence

He said that some gun deaths are necessary for us to still have our 2A rights. His death is, unfortunately, a gun death.

Yes, that was something else he said.

Both things are things that he said. They are not interchangeable.

Well then, unfortunately, so was the redditor in OP’s post

Charlie Kirk did not deserve to get shot, but unfortunately Charlie Kirk acknowledged that some gun deaths are necessarily to protect 2A rights, and that would include his own

His quote was his quote. Words unfortunately matter.

“It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”

That’s not saying “we will have gun deaths anyway”

It does if you want to rewrite the definitions of things, yes

Seethe more, faggot

What they’re referring to is when he said that gun deaths are a necessary circumstance for us to preserve our 2A rights

One person diagnosed with anxiety is part of this 45% statistic that you mentioned. How many women of that 45% are only diagnosed with anxiety, and otherwise live normal lives? I'm betting for certain that you can't answer that, and it should be acknowledged.

Given that most of the sexlessness is coming from mate suppression tactics that are institutionalized at a societal level

Fucking lol

Sexlessness (and childlessness) also stems from the fact that people are living in a society that doesn't give a shit about them. Happy couples are opting not to have children because they can't afford it.

If men are agitated by not having sex, they can easily become the type of man that other women (or men) want to have sex with. Every single man (every single man) I've ever met who has had trouble getting sex has had tangible, fixable issues (well within reason, not like surgery or anything) that can help him significantly. I've yet to meet an exception.

You're blaming the wrong thing

lawn care != topography, but way to completely miss the point.

lol what a stretch. You must be a treat for your neighborhood HOA

"The McPhearsons haven't mowed their lawn in 2 weeks! There's no clear line of site for our troops in hostile activity"

That's fucking rich lol

Well, reality shows that just because something is not necessary and beneficial to national security doesn't mean it is a threat to national security.

As an example: well-maintained lawns aren't a threat to national security, but they also aren't necessary for national security.

No, I wouldn't say that.

Passed you right by then huh? Shame. Too busy with your little emojis.

How do you suppose anxiety is a threat to national security?

How do you suppose sexlessness is a threat to national security?

Was gonna comment the same thing. These things are basically interchangeable.

Doesn't that include something as minor as anxiety? Someone with anxiety isn't a national security threat

That isn't implied here at all lol.

All it asks is what the personal definition of success is. It doesn't say anything about whether a government should provide that

Unfortunately when it comes to applying knowledge you're very very rarely dealing with generalities. If I'm having a conversation with you applying generalities to your behavior is stupid, because you are your own person, and you're not responsible for general behavior.

General behavior, as it is, is often skewed from bias. I can find 100 examples of this or that and deem it to be general behavior, when the reality has thousands of examples that disprove it that I choose to ignore. It doesn't make it so.

It's a shame you think so lowly of men that you assume men will prey on a woman if she's blackout drunk.

I made several. Reading is hard huh? Don't worry little buddy, you'll get there.

All those laughing emojis but no counter argument. Have you given up?

Made it too easy. Another win for me.

Isn't that funny? How people can just draw the line of life to whatever they see fit and suddenly declare that "these are VIOLENT KILLINGS" when that life ends?

bacteria also have olfaction, are they humans too?

I never said sperm are humans, so your logic is a bit broken there. However, based on your logic, that would also be considered life. Every time you use hand sanitizer, you're violently killing them.

You know, if we wanna play that card, sperm have a sense of smell, so frankly that would constitute life would it not?

So men, every time they ejaculate even during masturbation, drown, smother, or just let suffer and dry out millions of instances of life. By your metric, I would call that violent as well.

By your logic, men are by far the more violent killers.

The most common form of abortion is medicinal, my friend. Good try though retard!