Currently on the third book in a series called Dungeon Crawler Carl. It's like a DnD type adventure saga following one man. Pretty fun!

See that's the thing! I tried drinking poison just to test it but it didn't work because I'm immortal, so clearly you are seething, otherwise I wouldn't still be alive.

I know right? It's nuts. They said I can live forever as long as you're seething.

Nope! I've been granted immortality so I'm not gonna be dying anytime soon. I'm happy as ever too! Enjoying a little autumn rain today

We've also had a comment exchange a couple weeks ago. Guess you're not too observant.

It pretty much does prominently feature THEM though. It's the two main men having a conversation.

They're all playing british aristocrats.

Who cares? It's a comedy sketch. They aren't making it all about race, so why are you?

...who tf is making these arguments lol

The rebuttal would probably be "race does exist, it's the biological differences that racists insist on that don't exist."

How did you know tho

I'm not asking you to take anything as gospel. I'm asking for evidence of what you say. It seems the only reason you're saying all 321 of these Palestinians are murderers because "You feelz it tah be da troof."

If asking for evidence gets you this riled up you're soft.

I have nothing I'm being disingenuous about.

I'm talking about the 321 refugees. If you want to automatically assume that all of them are rapists and murderers then I'm not sure how I'm supposed to react to that when the data available says differently.

I'm sorry that me plainly stating basic facts are vile to you. I'm not insulting you, I'm not trolling, I'm simply sharing what the facts are as they are known.

So do you know, or are you betting?

For someone who is just guessing at what "probably" happened, you don't seem to be acting in good faith either. Did you hear about it? Did you read about it? Do you have names? I'm guessing no.

So do whites. So do blacks. So do asians. That doesn't mean anything.

We're talking about the people of the 321 refugees whose only known violations were traffic related requiring a fine at worst.

Why would I just take a tweet at face value? That's why I looked up where this sample came from, and what happened. There's not enough information in there.

Did you see the part where I wrote that over half of the "crimes" were traffic tickets/citations?

Well my post history involves looking up the actual data. Sorry that I don't take some tweet as gospel.

Yes, the same could be said for every population. That's kind of my whole point.

...did they? Or are you just guessing?

Why are you talking about rape and murder?

Also, I'd put serious money on taking a random sample of 300 white Midwesterners and getting a 60% traffic violation rate. I'm a great driver and even I have a few tickets.

I looked this up. Over half of the ones that were convicted of a crime were recipients of a fine and no jail time for things like traffic violations.

This is a pretty bad representation of what actually happened

Are we talking about a specific person?

I always have a problem taking a general idea of what some people's opinions are and applying it to a singular person you're having an discussion with. I figured we were talking about a hypothetical person who is disagreeing about a person getting censored by the media/the government. Is this supposed to be a person who reacted in a specific way towards Charlie Kirk's death?

Seems a dramatic assumption lol

Well then the conversation has shifted dramatically, they shift it back to the fact that there’s still a difference between private companies censoring participants presidents requesting that shows get cancelled

Then they hit you with a “it was a global pandemic”

They’ll tell you that the difference is tournament organizers banning them vs the president requesting him being banned

I guess financially, yeah. It's still only a recent release though. Plenty of movies have made profit in later weeks of release.

Still, with strong reviews across the board, if I had made that movie I would be happy with that

Where do you see it flopping? The ratings have been pretty strongly positive. I hear people talking about it and raving about it.

It earned $22 million over the weekend, topping the box office and handily marking the best weekend for a film directed by Anderson, topping the $4.9 million earned by There Will Be Blood in its fifth weekend in 2008

Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 95 out of 100, based on 54 critics, indicating "universal acclaim"