For our next constitution, the very first edict is as follows:

"Any man whom makes public their support of usury or fiat is to be taken to the public square and executed. No exceptions."

Jesus didn't believe in democracy and neither did God.

Modern "Christians" are a pathetic joke.

As an aside, anyone who fills their name with titles is either memeing or full of shit.

When people say that the right attracts self centered narcissists who lack empathy, I point to examples like this post and agree with them.

We have great empathy for our own people.

Why should I care about some random nigger who wants to break the laws of my country when there are white children suffering every day?

Why should I provide for someone who isn't an American when there are Americans whose family has been here for generations yet do not have generational housing?

It's not us that lack empathy.

I'd say it's you who lacks empathy. You hate my people and want to destroy them, and you think you're clever when you try to pretend to be one of them. Don't worry. You'll get what you're owed in due time.

Mob justice is often real justice.

Why wait for the state to spend hundreds of thousands of your dollars to prosecute a child rapist, and then spend millions more housing him for 30 years, when you've got a bullet and a shovel in your garage?

The high command doesn't allow regular troops to be armed for a few reasons:

1. There's a very high risk that enlisted troops will kill themselves at night when they realize their entire life is a lie

2. If they don't kill themselves, they'll kill their officers

And

3. Regular troops are not allowed any semblance of autonomy.

I will never understand why people "support our troops." It's a giant death cult that hates you. There is no honor to be gained in the military and there hasn't been since WW1.

You're pulling the leftist linguistic word salad bullshit and attempting to constantly redefine the argument in different terms.

My words and my message have been consistent the entire time.

Yours have been nebulous and amorphous so as to shift the current topic to be inconsistent.

And one day, for absolutely no reason at all, the German people voted Hitler into power.

Your definition of degeneracy is 100% designed to be abusive and promote authoritarian punishments down the road once you've established a new normal.

I could say the exact same thing about the bloated ruleset here, and have.

The difference being that my system is not designed to suppress, but to uplift.

Race is not blood and soil, the entire Nazi conception of race doesn't make sense by any standard of measurement. 

It's not the Nazi concept.

Race is inherent to all elder society m civilizations. A nation is bred of its people.

Look at America today. It barely even resembles what it was created as. Those changes were most severe and drastic following the immigration expansion of the 50s.

No one built anything to support "their race". The Danes didn't build castles for the Scots, the Spanish didn't build cathedrals for Canadians, etc. The entire concept of racial solidarity is in violation of national sovereignty.

What in the hell are you talking about?

The Scots aren't Danish, nor the Spanish Canadian.

The Danes acted out of preference to Danes. The Spanish for Spaniards. This went for a thousand years and held nations together.

abandonment of your nation to identify with people who are outside your community, don't speak your language, don't share your culture, aren't of the same religion, don't have any ties to you, but look kind of like you.

You've completely twisted and destroyed the idea of race in order to make this argument.

Language is racial. Culture is racial. Religion is racial.

All of this is bred and created through blood and soil. When you say nonsense like this you're throwing away a millennium of evolutionary selection that breeds the differences between men. There are major differences between the various European tribes, AND YET, because of their long history of interbreeding, war, and trade, they are mostly very culturally connected.

The same cannot be said of Africans. There is no higher connection between the racial umbrella of black and white, and we can see the effect of this today by just looking around. It's like mixing oil and water.

Now the Asians in my opinion have much more in common due to ancient migratory patterns of the Aryans. Northern India was basically ruled by a racial caste of whites, and it's embedded into their religion.

People build things for their direct communities and their children. Not their race.

Brother, that IS RACE.

It was only in the past few century that these ideas were decoupled and what they've been twisted into DOES NOT WORK.

You can very plainly see that this modern abomination is a complete and abject failure. There is not a single facet of the modern view of race, of culture, of society, that is successful.

Racialism doesn't have a monopoly on tradition, it's a violation of it.

That is a leftist argument.

You cling to a modern definition and ideological view of an ancient concept. Worse, you cling to a worldview that is a proven failure.

Race is tradition because it dwells in the history of a people. We are told to throw this away and to fight and honor our neighbors who we have nothing in common with, do not share our blood, and are actively opposed to our way of life.

Again, I pity you.

You call me a leftist yet you're fully committed to the bolshevik mindset.

My God.

You're an idiot.

The saddest part is that I think this wouldn't be bought by the rich, but those that want to appear rich.

It's like the extended families that all live in one house and trade off a single expensive car, watch, wardrobe, etc, so they can pretend to be wealthy. The Indians do it pretty often, though I've seen a lot of Mexicans doing it as well.

I've been consistent and my point was clear. You cannot understand or comprehend that I consider the issue of prostitution from a different moral and ethical foundation.

Sexual favors for profit and networking are not even close to being similar.

And jesus are you engaging in all the same tactics as a Leftist would rhetorically.

I think you're seeing what you want to see.

You took an interpretation of what I wrote outside of what I meant.

I apologize if I was unclear.

It's honestly hard for me to tell whether you're a Leftist Troll trying to start shit, or you're a Leftist activist trying to advocate shit.

I am an ultranationalist.

I've said so multiple times on here.

If being a nationalist these days is leftist, I wanna come to whatever world you're living in because this one here is a clown world.

You know damn well I'm right and you're trying to fucking cry-bully me into thinking you're being victimized by my terrible anti-white oppression... while being able to clearly assert your points.

That's not what I'm doing at all, Dom.

I'm pointing out what I personally see as a bit of hypocrisy.

Right because "degeneracy" won't be used as a catch all term for anything you don't like.

Degeneracy is not a catch-all term because it has a definition. I define degeneracy as actions and ideas which undermine the ongoing health of the nation.

Further, I am not in favor of banning or making illegal all forms of degeneracy. For example, being overweight is degenerate. Being obese incredibly so. Yet, banning it would do nothing. It is much more constructive to build a social order where such things are naturally uncommon, and to fix the national diet to where becoming fat takes real effort.

Racialism is a Leftist construction.

I unironically pity you.

I'm so sorry for what society has done to you.

Race is not a leftist construct.

Race is blood and soil.

A nation is built by the blood of its people and of its enemies.

To discard the notion of race is to discard and stomp on everything your ancestors have built and gifted to you.

It is anti-racialism that is a leftist construct.

I hope you have a wonderful week.

Genetics and behavior are not banned. The assertion that blacks are an inherently criminal race is. There's a fine distinction there you won't maintain because of ideology.

Note again that I said predisposed.

I cannot make the claim that blacks are a criminal race because isn't really true and cannot be argued logically.

I can make the claim that blacks are predisposed to certain behaviors, because it is can be argued logically and with evidence.

That's a lie, I never require you to disassociate anything.

I'm not saying you do.

That was more a statement on social convention.

I've noticed, on that note, that this is something that often happens in our discussions.

Am I unclear? Are you reading what you want to hear? Or is it something else?

Your argument is political in nature, and specifically about racial inferiority.

Despite what you may believe, I am interested only in the truth of things.

My argument isn't any racial inferiority at all, though the topic itself must by necessity preclude to the idea that there are, within different systems, superior and inferior traits.

It is my intention that we identify these superior traits, identify what gives rise to them, and utilize this information so that all may benefit.

You think that opposing white racialism is opposing white people, in the same way a BLM activist would scream that anti-CRT is anti-Black.

No, having seen a few of that guy's videos and the kind of thing he often posts here I legitimately believe he is anti-white.

Again, by the way, I don't really have an issue with that.

You're acting like a racial justice activist, and that's because you are a racial justice activist.

Racial justice?

No.

I'm an advocate for white Christian men. I want white Christian men to realize and understand that they need to act with in-group preference in order to protect themselves and their future.

Thing is, conversation on this sub is so uninhibited that white racialists don't even use jokes and memes. You just fucking say it.

Exactly!

It's great.

I want the anti-white subversives to also be able to "just fucking say it" instead of pretending that it's just a prank bro.

I got some crazy guy screaming that Joe Biden is an Iraqi Jew. ... ... There's no joke.

Yeah I saw that. Was weird as hell. But that's the internet for you.

He said it because there's no eggshells. There's no real barriers. There's almost nothing in the way of stopping you from spreading your racialist ideology.

Well first, that's not my ideology. I think he's probably one of the Q types who just believe whatever weird conspiracy is making the rounds that week.

Second, didn't you remove that post? Kinda odd to point to that one for your point.

I already consider your racialism Leftist subversion.

Why though? I've been pretty damn open the entire time about who I am and what I'm for/about. I have always asserted that I'm about as far right as a man can be.

You certainly have more of a platform that you would even think of letting me have

Not true at all, and you know that.

I am fully open to you expressing your opinion and welcome it. I want you to honestly and openly engage in whatever discussion you'd like.

Now that said, here comes the "but;"

I think things like transgender and homosexual propaganda should be stomped out. I have previously extolled how I consider it to be a kind of mental virus that spreads through certain channels.

That's a whole 'nother topic though.

you decide to be greedy and try and get more power because you assume that I'm weak for not having purged you because you think like a predator.

Back to the point; no, not at all.

I don't really get where all the personal hostility comes from.

My posts here are pretty split between shitposts and substantive discussion. I prefer the discussions because they're more interesting and there's people here who disagree with me yet still debate honestly.

I don't assume or think you're weak. I don't understand your reasoning for setting some of the rules or your enforcement of them.

I also don't understand labeling me a leftist, but I've seen a few people do it and assume it's an emotional reaction against the positive racialism I sometimes talk about.

Wear a mask for long enough and you'll become the face you've put on.

I can't help the fact that you and others are making such comments in one and only one direction.

What are you talking about? I've said multiple times that I don't think it should be banned in either direction. I'm saying that from my perspective it looks like there's a stigma in the way it's handled that gives more leeway to anti-white posts than others. Pretty sure I even pointed this out a long time ago.

You get more leeway here than anywhere else online at this point. If you didn't, you'd already be gone.

I'm here because I genuinely like the community and there's often interesting conversations and topics. There's a few other places I sometimes frequent but the vibe isn't the same.

I mean I've only been here since GamerGate started.

Considering most of GG was Left Libertarian, I think you are way off on the influence of any right-wing anything back in 2014 KiA.

I'm not talking about 2014 lol

I'm talking about now.

Hell, we can even go back to the split that made KiA2 if you want. There'd probably be even higher support for full speech then than now.

I saw that part of your conversation

I'm talking about a lot more than that.

No, it would be removed because you are asserting that a race of people is inherently inferior. There's no crossed T's and dotted I's. It just wouldn't fly at all.

Exactly!

That's the point.

Certain discussions are entirely banned.

I have never seen anyone (even that troll I just saw) say that Men, Whites, or Christians are an inherently, biologically, inferior degenerate race of lesser humans on KIA. 

You're right, it's just what is linked to for discussion.

AoV himself sometimes even linking such things multiple times a day.

My point between these last two points is that we are not able to even examine these ideas truthfully. We have to immediately disassociate and say it's bad.

I would be more than happy to debate a leftist who thinks whites are inferior because X. I welcome them to make that post. If it is done in good faith, though it almost certainly wouldn't be, it could be a good discussion.

On the corollary, I could get quite in depth as to how I feel on certain issues.

But those topics are banned, even when they're on topic to a larger issue.

And before you pull the, "BUT NO GROUP IS ALLOWED TO BE LABELED INFERIOR/WORSE/ETC" card, that's not what I said or was asking about.

"Black Americans are genetically predisposed to criminality, and here's why;"

I worded that very specifically to be useable as an entirely evidentiary or logical argument assigning neither negative nor positive connotations.

Genetics and influence on behavior is a fascinating topic that is allowed in very, very few places.

I wasn't arguing, I was making a meme.

My argument came in my second post.

She was too young to have any real experiences. Everything she's talking about she has learned second hand at minimum, yet she uses it as first hand experience. It's deceptive.

I do not like propping random jews up on pedestals because of their vague relationship to an 80 year old event.

My point is that it's not a joke.

Show me a real anti-white post anywhere in KIA2

It doesn't matter if it's a "real" post.

By the standards given it's comparable anti-white rhetoric that is using a thin veneer of absurdity to get away with being anti-white.

And with how often that guy says it and uses that example, I'm of the opinion he seriously hates the Irish.

Why are "jokes" about anti-white memes allowed, but "jokes" about anti-black or anti-jew memes aren't?

Do you get how that's a double standard?

I don't think that's true considering what HandOfBane and AoV have told me directly.

Which is hilariously ironic considering the reason KiA2 came about was because the userbase disagreed with what the powerusers/mods wanted.

I think they'd be quite surprised at the outcome if opinions were polled.

That is a ridiculous exaggeration. I know because "anything negative" is what I have to do on Reddit.

It's an exaggeration, but not a ridiculous one. From my own experience, the experience of others, and from the mod logs, there's still a weird heavy handedness in regards to negative content.

I can accept that it's a difference in opinion on acceptable speech. I just heavily disagree and think it's unnecessary.

Again, not a thing here.

You've just said though that Impossible1 had to stifle his speech to fit the rules. I know I have, and others have told me they have as well.

I also know I've had a few longer, well written, well reasoned posts removed in the past. One reinstated after I changed terminology, but that's still ridiculous.

Here, let me even give you an example:

If I were to write something along the veins of "Black Americans are genetically predisposed to criminality, and here's why;" I would have to dot every i and cross every t to not get the message purged. It would still probably be purged.

It seems pretty clear to me.

We went over that half a year ago.

It is anything but clear.

Do you really want me to start dolling out punishments based on my interpretation of whether reports are in bad faith or not?

The opposite.

I think most reports are bullshit in general. There's very little that deserves being removed.

My further answer to that is in the other post.

If I did that, I'd have to take action against your reports already, and that's dumb.

You know exactly why I made those reports.

It is a bad joke that I was banned for that conversation, and the other guy was untouched. Multiple of his posts went over the line into anti-white attacks by the standards applied to my posts.

I don't think EITHER should be removed but the hypocrisy of it is astounding. You're using different standards between anti-white posts and anti-nonwhite posts.

I don't want you banning ANY of it except for the most low-effort, obvious bait posts.

I'm pretty certain as well that that's the majority opinion, and has been going all the way back to the creation of KiA2. Even the OG KiA people wanted full freedom of speech, with the stipulation that much was either off topic or bad faith actors.

The idea that anything negative about classes or groups is banned, except when it attacks whites, is ridiculous. The idea that high level threads are made every day directly linking to anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christian activism, meanwhile ordinary posters have to walk on egg shells on topics about race, gender, tribe, etc, is silly.

There's no sitewide requirement for these kinds of removals as there was on reddit.

In compliance with what?

The rules are vague as all hell and allow or disallow pretty much anything.

It's pretty damn obvious people are reporting in bad faith and you let them get away with it.

Bro.

No.

Stop.

I don't need your wall of text arguing linguistics.

Fuck right off with that.

I wrote my point, my point is clear, do not jumble it into nonsense that I did not say.