I can't help the fact that you and others are making such comments in one and only one direction.
What are you talking about? I've said multiple times that I don't think it should be banned in either direction. I'm saying that from my perspective it looks like there's a stigma in the way it's handled that gives more leeway to anti-white posts than others. Pretty sure I even pointed this out a long time ago.
You get more leeway here than anywhere else online at this point. If you didn't, you'd already be gone.
I'm here because I genuinely like the community and there's often interesting conversations and topics. There's a few other places I sometimes frequent but the vibe isn't the same.
I mean I've only been here since GamerGate started.
Considering most of GG was Left Libertarian, I think you are way off on the influence of any right-wing anything back in 2014 KiA.
I'm not talking about 2014 lol
I'm talking about now.
Hell, we can even go back to the split that made KiA2 if you want. There'd probably be even higher support for full speech then than now.
I saw that part of your conversation
I'm talking about a lot more than that.
No, it would be removed because you are asserting that a race of people is inherently inferior. There's no crossed T's and dotted I's. It just wouldn't fly at all.
Exactly!
That's the point.
Certain discussions are entirely banned.
I have never seen anyone (even that troll I just saw) say that Men, Whites, or Christians are an inherently, biologically, inferior degenerate race of lesser humans on KIA.
You're right, it's just what is linked to for discussion.
AoV himself sometimes even linking such things multiple times a day.
My point between these last two points is that we are not able to even examine these ideas truthfully. We have to immediately disassociate and say it's bad.
I would be more than happy to debate a leftist who thinks whites are inferior because X. I welcome them to make that post. If it is done in good faith, though it almost certainly wouldn't be, it could be a good discussion.
On the corollary, I could get quite in depth as to how I feel on certain issues.
But those topics are banned, even when they're on topic to a larger issue.
And before you pull the, "BUT NO GROUP IS ALLOWED TO BE LABELED INFERIOR/WORSE/ETC" card, that's not what I said or was asking about.
"Black Americans are genetically predisposed to criminality, and here's why;"
I worded that very specifically to be useable as an entirely evidentiary or logical argument assigning neither negative nor positive connotations.
Genetics and influence on behavior is a fascinating topic that is allowed in very, very few places.
Genetics and behavior are not banned. The assertion that blacks are an inherently criminal race is. There's a fine distinction there you won't maintain because of ideology.
My point between these last two points is that we are not able to even examine these ideas truthfully. We have to immediately disassociate and say it's bad.
That's a lie, I never require you to disassociate anything.
Genetics and influence on behavior is a fascinating topic that is allowed in very, very few places.
If you wanted to have an argument about genetics and criminal behavior, you could. But we both know that's absolutely not your point. Your argument is political in nature, and specifically about racial inferiority.
Genetics and behavior are not banned. The assertion that blacks are an inherently criminal race is. There's a fine distinction there you won't maintain because of ideology.
Note again that I said predisposed.
I cannot make the claim that blacks are a criminal race because isn't really true and cannot be argued logically.
I can make the claim that blacks are predisposed to certain behaviors, because it is can be argued logically and with evidence.
That's a lie, I never require you to disassociate anything.
I'm not saying you do.
That was more a statement on social convention.
I've noticed, on that note, that this is something that often happens in our discussions.
Am I unclear? Are you reading what you want to hear? Or is it something else?
Your argument is political in nature, and specifically about racial inferiority.
Despite what you may believe, I am interested only in the truth of things.
My argument isn't any racial inferiority at all, though the topic itself must by necessity preclude to the idea that there are, within different systems, superior and inferior traits.
It is my intention that we identify these superior traits, identify what gives rise to them, and utilize this information so that all may benefit.
What are you talking about? I've said multiple times that I don't think it should be banned in either direction. I'm saying that from my perspective it looks like there's a stigma in the way it's handled that gives more leeway to anti-white posts than others. Pretty sure I even pointed this out a long time ago.
I'm here because I genuinely like the community and there's often interesting conversations and topics. There's a few other places I sometimes frequent but the vibe isn't the same.
I mean I've only been here since GamerGate started.
I'm not talking about 2014 lol
I'm talking about now.
Hell, we can even go back to the split that made KiA2 if you want. There'd probably be even higher support for full speech then than now.
I'm talking about a lot more than that.
Exactly!
That's the point.
Certain discussions are entirely banned.
You're right, it's just what is linked to for discussion.
AoV himself sometimes even linking such things multiple times a day.
My point between these last two points is that we are not able to even examine these ideas truthfully. We have to immediately disassociate and say it's bad.
I would be more than happy to debate a leftist who thinks whites are inferior because X. I welcome them to make that post. If it is done in good faith, though it almost certainly wouldn't be, it could be a good discussion.
On the corollary, I could get quite in depth as to how I feel on certain issues.
But those topics are banned, even when they're on topic to a larger issue.
And before you pull the, "BUT NO GROUP IS ALLOWED TO BE LABELED INFERIOR/WORSE/ETC" card, that's not what I said or was asking about.
I worded that very specifically to be useable as an entirely evidentiary or logical argument assigning neither negative nor positive connotations.
Genetics and influence on behavior is a fascinating topic that is allowed in very, very few places.
Genetics and behavior are not banned. The assertion that blacks are an inherently criminal race is. There's a fine distinction there you won't maintain because of ideology.
That's a lie, I never require you to disassociate anything.
If you wanted to have an argument about genetics and criminal behavior, you could. But we both know that's absolutely not your point. Your argument is political in nature, and specifically about racial inferiority.
Note again that I said predisposed.
I cannot make the claim that blacks are a criminal race because isn't really true and cannot be argued logically.
I can make the claim that blacks are predisposed to certain behaviors, because it is can be argued logically and with evidence.
I'm not saying you do.
That was more a statement on social convention.
I've noticed, on that note, that this is something that often happens in our discussions.
Am I unclear? Are you reading what you want to hear? Or is it something else?
Despite what you may believe, I am interested only in the truth of things.
My argument isn't any racial inferiority at all, though the topic itself must by necessity preclude to the idea that there are, within different systems, superior and inferior traits.
It is my intention that we identify these superior traits, identify what gives rise to them, and utilize this information so that all may benefit.
You just did. And jesus are you engaging in all the same tactics as a Leftist would rhetorically.
It's honestly hard for me to tell whether you're a Leftist Troll trying to start shit, or you're a Leftist activist trying to advocate shit.
I'm not even trying to use "Leftist" as an insult at this point. It's just uncanny how you operate.
I think you're seeing what you want to see.
You took an interpretation of what I wrote outside of what I meant.
I apologize if I was unclear.
I am an ultranationalist.
I've said so multiple times on here.
If being a nationalist these days is leftist, I wanna come to whatever world you're living in because this one here is a clown world.