Genetics and behavior are not banned. The assertion that blacks are an inherently criminal race is. There's a fine distinction there you won't maintain because of ideology.
My point between these last two points is that we are not able to even examine these ideas truthfully. We have to immediately disassociate and say it's bad.
That's a lie, I never require you to disassociate anything.
Genetics and influence on behavior is a fascinating topic that is allowed in very, very few places.
If you wanted to have an argument about genetics and criminal behavior, you could. But we both know that's absolutely not your point. Your argument is political in nature, and specifically about racial inferiority.
Genetics and behavior are not banned. The assertion that blacks are an inherently criminal race is. There's a fine distinction there you won't maintain because of ideology.
Note again that I said predisposed.
I cannot make the claim that blacks are a criminal race because isn't really true and cannot be argued logically.
I can make the claim that blacks are predisposed to certain behaviors, because it is can be argued logically and with evidence.
That's a lie, I never require you to disassociate anything.
I'm not saying you do.
That was more a statement on social convention.
I've noticed, on that note, that this is something that often happens in our discussions.
Am I unclear? Are you reading what you want to hear? Or is it something else?
Your argument is political in nature, and specifically about racial inferiority.
Despite what you may believe, I am interested only in the truth of things.
My argument isn't any racial inferiority at all, though the topic itself must by necessity preclude to the idea that there are, within different systems, superior and inferior traits.
It is my intention that we identify these superior traits, identify what gives rise to them, and utilize this information so that all may benefit.
Genetics and behavior are not banned. The assertion that blacks are an inherently criminal race is. There's a fine distinction there you won't maintain because of ideology.
That's a lie, I never require you to disassociate anything.
If you wanted to have an argument about genetics and criminal behavior, you could. But we both know that's absolutely not your point. Your argument is political in nature, and specifically about racial inferiority.
Note again that I said predisposed.
I cannot make the claim that blacks are a criminal race because isn't really true and cannot be argued logically.
I can make the claim that blacks are predisposed to certain behaviors, because it is can be argued logically and with evidence.
I'm not saying you do.
That was more a statement on social convention.
I've noticed, on that note, that this is something that often happens in our discussions.
Am I unclear? Are you reading what you want to hear? Or is it something else?
Despite what you may believe, I am interested only in the truth of things.
My argument isn't any racial inferiority at all, though the topic itself must by necessity preclude to the idea that there are, within different systems, superior and inferior traits.
It is my intention that we identify these superior traits, identify what gives rise to them, and utilize this information so that all may benefit.
You just did. And jesus are you engaging in all the same tactics as a Leftist would rhetorically.
It's honestly hard for me to tell whether you're a Leftist Troll trying to start shit, or you're a Leftist activist trying to advocate shit.
I'm not even trying to use "Leftist" as an insult at this point. It's just uncanny how you operate.
I think you're seeing what you want to see.
You took an interpretation of what I wrote outside of what I meant.
I apologize if I was unclear.
I am an ultranationalist.
I've said so multiple times on here.
If being a nationalist these days is leftist, I wanna come to whatever world you're living in because this one here is a clown world.