I know. You'd rather your family fucking starves to death. It's amazing how ideological racists are; they actually want to die to spite people with darker skin.
Of course the Southern economy was in utter shambles during the Reconstruction. From 1865-1867, the two years after the war ended, food was extremely scarce and there was a major famine. Hundreds of thousands of civilians died; one historian pegs the number at a full million.
Clothes were the least of their concerns.
Hell, their economy still hasn't fully recovered; pretty much all of the poorest states are former slave states.
Well, no one's attacking 'em, so there's no need to play defense.
I don't like identity games. People are people. If someone was like "All white people are the same and all they care about is money and control," I'd be like "No, man. Very wrong."
If by "ethnically cleansed" you mean "their women are on birth control and don't feel like having kids in their twenties."
There's some of that good ole Neo-Nazi violence!
We're talking about 42 million Americans. Police can't possibly catch that much shoplifting, and even if we could, our prison capacity is about 1.1 million and it's already well over capacity.
You're also suggesting we just make one eighth of the population into slaves. Okay, who the fuck is going to oversee the slavery? Nothing you're saying is realistic or thought through.
Which has been my point the whole time. Politicians tell you they're gonna deport all the migrants, and the very second that they're forced to deal with reality in any way, they're like: oh.
Yeah, and then you dig into who they are. A college professor whose small college closed. A single mom trying to work from home. An electrician who just stormed off after a fight with his asshole boss.
They're not gonna rush off to the countryside to pick almonds. They already have that option and they're not taking it. It's not work that they want.
You could not be doing a better job of hiding from that question if you tried.
I guess I get why you'd be scared to face it. I mean, even if you are a Neo-Nazi in every sense of the word, people wouldn't like it if you wore the label on your sleeve.
Not that people like you anyway, and not that you're using identifiable information here... okay, maybe I don't get why you're so scared.
Bill Clinton eliminated welfare in 1996 and somehow you missed the memo.
You mean eliminate SNAP? Yeah, I assure you that the $180/month debit card is not the determining factor in whether these people go work in fields and slaughterhouses. The government just hands those out at the behest of Wal Mart, to slightly reduce shoplifting.
Sooo... is this your way of telling me you're never going to explain why you don't like being called a Neo-Nazi?
I mean, let's look at Hitler's core beliefs. "White people are good; the further you are from that, the worse. Bad things should be destroyed so good things can flourish. Sexual deviants and mentally deficient people are also bad things. Jews are especially bad things, since they conspire against white people."
Soooo... any disagreement with any of that? At all?
Friend, you are nitpicking at the dumbest fucking bullshit. You're acting like a nagging housewife who's like "but two weeks ago you said you were gonna do the dishes and you didn't!" Stop that; it's faggotry.
Meanwhile you just won't address the question head-on: if you hate Jews and blacks and Indians and gays; if you don't think jeets are real people and that they should all be exterminated; if you believe in White Replacement Theory and that Jews are trying to replace the next generation with nonwhites; then why the fuck are you objecting to being called a Neo-Nazi?
Not a "lib." A lib doesn't believe in respecting market forces. I do.
And the answer is pretty simple: supply and demand. That's what sets market price. If you fire 70% of the workforce producing the food, the supply will plummet. If that happens, food prices will skyrocket.
"Triple"? Just a guess, really. It could be much, much worse than that. It could be as bad as having a year or two where food was borderline unavailable at any price. Followed by the scenario I gave you - the forced expulsion of city-dwellers into the agricultural sector.
"Yes I was. I grew up on a military base." is a weird way to convey that you were once a soldier. Sounds more like you're saying that you're soldier-adjacent because your dad was a soldier. Which is how I interpreted it.
It's like asking someone if they're a professional musician and having them say "Yes I am. I own a guitar." The second sentence undermines the first one.
I don't think American citizens would go dashing out to the countryside to pick food. I don't think your average Project Management Specialist is going to be like "Hey, honey, pull the kids out of school! We're moving to Texas so I can work a graveyard slaughterhouse shift!"
I find two kinds of Americans on forums like these: ones who are like "American citizens will totally do that work! Not me personally, I have more skills than that, but some of them!"; and ones who are like "I'd totally do that work!" even though they haven't worked a single day in ten years.
Now, sure, if it were literally a matter of life and death, and the government "strongly encouraged" people out of the cities and onto farms, maybe it could happen. But this isn't some kind of utopian scenario. This is the government flat-out making two million citizens' lives worse than they were.
Aww, Petey, you shouldn't get so mad. It's bad for your blood pressure.
What's really crazy is that you're not mad about the fact that I accurately noticed you're a Neo-Nazi. You're mad because you made a post where you shoved a "And yes I was" in at random with very little context, and I did not interpret that as "I was an active-duty soldier until I got dishonorably discharged for being a Nazi."
There is some automated farm equipment, yes. But we still require about 3.5 million farm workers, and about 2.5 million of them are non-citizens.
And the idea that we'll just make lots of better robots really fast is just, you know, dipshittery. If we could do that, we'd have already done it. Don't get me wrong, it'll happen, but probably not for like 50 years.
So, what you're saying is that I was I right about the 17 year old part. You're a super passionate kid who's failing English, and you express that by getting intensely crazy and angry on whatever parts of the Internet won't ban you.
It's just not, man. You're factually incorrect. This isn't a matter of opinion. This is like if you told me that capitalism is the worship of Thor. It's just a wrong answer, and you get an F.
A very 17-year-old answer. "Let's just build a bunch of sci-fi AI robots tomorrow and then they can harvest all the food!"
I see you inserted the word "young" in there for no reason. Would I be correct to guess that you're about 17?
So, I was right. You have no idea what Critical Race Theory is.
I suspect that there is an exactly zero percent chance that you know what Critical Race Theory is.
I have, in fact, had the displeasure of encountering BLM and Antifa people.
I've only ever met one actual Marxist. Nice guy. Good pianist. Super fucking autistic, though.
Here's a fun fact for you: there's more than one way to be radical. And one way to be radical is to spend all day screaming anti-Jew shit all over the Internet. You know, like a - whispers - Nazi.
mhm. And let me guess, your concept of "genocide" is "having to see a brown person at the store."
The law is supposed to serve people, not the other way around. If we can eat strawberries wherever we want at an affordable price point, that's better than if strawberries are a "rare treat," and the laws should change to reflect that.