Not a "lib." A lib doesn't believe in respecting market forces. I do.
And the answer is pretty simple: supply and demand. That's what sets market price. If you fire 70% of the workforce producing the food, the supply will plummet. If that happens, food prices will skyrocket.
"Triple"? Just a guess, really. It could be much, much worse than that. It could be as bad as having a year or two where food was borderline unavailable at any price. Followed by the scenario I gave you - the forced expulsion of city-dwellers into the agricultural sector.
You think industrial farming will let food rot on the ground instead of increase wages. If food is "unavailable", regardless of price, that means number-go-down for Sysco, Monsanto, et al. You think these megacorps will just shrug and die instead of hire a White at twice the wage of a brown.
I agree, actually. Glad we're on the same page about corporate-sponsored White genocide.
Not a "lib." A lib doesn't believe in respecting market forces. I do.
And the answer is pretty simple: supply and demand. That's what sets market price. If you fire 70% of the workforce producing the food, the supply will plummet. If that happens, food prices will skyrocket.
"Triple"? Just a guess, really. It could be much, much worse than that. It could be as bad as having a year or two where food was borderline unavailable at any price. Followed by the scenario I gave you - the forced expulsion of city-dwellers into the agricultural sector.
You think industrial farming will let food rot on the ground instead of increase wages. If food is "unavailable", regardless of price, that means number-go-down for Sysco, Monsanto, et al. You think these megacorps will just shrug and die instead of hire a White at twice the wage of a brown.
I agree, actually. Glad we're on the same page about corporate-sponsored White genocide.