Why would I bother to wake up?
You don't want to be with a woman who works, they're worse. Though, a heiress is good if you can get a piece of her estate, even just a job at the family business might make the exchange worth it.
That's a smart way to do it. It's basically what I've been looking into as well for kids. I think if I'm still single by 40yo, I might go this route.
That's the way to do it. Might be cheaper than one would expect too.
What was his method?
Jordan Peterson is a nice guy with the right heart but he has no clue what is required to win a war.
You def sound higher on the scale for physical attractiveness and even overall attractiveness as a guy scale than me. I've let my body go here a little the last two years. I just haven't got enough benefit from the effort I put in but I think at my peak, it sounds like I wouldn't be close to you. I've never been buff but I've had a decent physique. I'm smaller as a guy though. My limbs and bones are small so I never come off "big". I think my best weight has been 165 pounds and 5'10". Size 30 waist. I'm sitting at about a 31 waist now and probably around same weight. My size has never really been an attractor like for you.
I wish I could have warned you about the master's degree thing. Women going to school is a huge problem for failing relationships. My longest relationship was great until she decided to go back to school for law. Then it all fell apart. I see this theme again and again. Women going to school is a huge red flag for a relationship. These days I prefer women without post secondary and with 0 plans to ever go back to school. I find education/career in women is a huge detractor for relationships.
I've mostly lived in the mid-west areas. It's more "conservative" but that comes with its own share of problems. I'm currently living in a town of 30,000 people. I'm not exaggerating but almost every 20yo girl who wants marriage is already married or engaged to her HS sweetheart. If she's in her 20s-30s and single it's because she has someone else's kids. I moved her for significantly more money but I was hoping maybe there would be some decent small town girls. I underestimated how impossible it is for someone who wasn't born and raised in the community to meet single girls here though. I'll probably be here a couple years then move to I think my 9th city I will have lived in. Still, while big cities have more available single women, it doesn't solve the problem of big cities. Most of the women want equal 50/50 relationships where they're working 9-5 jobs and all that stuff. You sound like perhaps you haven't quite come to the conclusion that I have regarding that. Careers shape women's personalities and not in a good way. What may have seemed like a good quality girl when she was young and in school or 1-2 years out of school can quickly turn into those 30yo monstrosities you so know exist and career is often how that happens to women. The more career ambitious the woman, the worse her personality tends to develop. The fact major corporations are rolling the red carpet out for anyone with a vagina is a huge ego boost to women but these women are actually underserving of the roles which puts a strain on relationships because women get an inflated sense of their competence and intelligence which leads to conflict in relationships if they want everything 50/50 and don't listen to the men in the relationships.
Smaller towns at least still aren't quite dominated by the same corps that dominate big cities so there's less of the modern affirmative action diversity and inclusion bullshit so women aren't entirely propped up with inflated egos yet but then the counterpoint is unless you were fucking her in high school, she's already going to be married or used up with a kid by the time she blips on your radar.
For me, it just seems like a hopeless situation. My current strategy is just save some money and then go to Costa Rica in 10 years. Buy a bunch of hookers and blow and hope I die of a heart attack before I run out of money.
Not the ancients. Tradcuck is more of a modern Christian society invention. Rome arguably fell because men weren't tradcucked and didn't want much to do with out of control women. Rome got too matriarchal by the end. Any civilization in which women were treated like objected where men had total control over them as done well but women always try to subvert these societies. Women always succeed and then the civilization crumbles.
Humanity cannot exist without women, yet, so what you want is pure fantasy but a hard patriarchy in which women are nothing but property of man has existed and can exist.
What good is an arranged marriage if the woman can just leave the marriage?
I think the ancients knew the nature of women much better than modernists. I mean Aristotle himself said women were inherently evil. Saint Paul said never to let women teach men about immorality. Saint Aquinas also said women were inherently inferior than men and that women should always be regarded as lesser than men etc... We knew the truth about women once and we forgot. Now we're learning the lesson again.
Siegfried and Roy made the mistake of thinking they had a bond with their tiger that transcended the nature of the tiger.
It's a mistake men often make.
Perhaps we're different but I for one would love a harem of slaves to fuck and if any disobeyed me I'd have them executed. Sure there is a risk I could get assassinated but I'd still take that risk.
Until we have fully functional sexbots that do everything we want, women can still add value to our lives if they are wholly and totally dominated by men with 0 power or influence in society and 0 standing compared to men.
Damn, that's what zoomers think? Everything was fine and dandy until tiktok? Hahahahaha, that's sad. Very sad. But it shows men's ultimate weakness. They want to blame something else, Jews, China, Tiktok, Dating Apps, Social Media, Globalists, Communists, etc... When the answer is just quite simply "this is female nature unleashed".
It's too bad they don't read ancient books about women anymore. Something like assemblywoman should be mandatory reading.
You cannot fix female behavior, you can only attempt to control it.
Two weeks? Come on this isn't my first rodeo. The mods will ban me 10 separate times for each word in my sentence and I'll end up suspended for 3 months at least.
Where do you live? After I started losing my hair and it thinned a lot in my late twenties, I stopped getting interest from 20yo girls. It was actually a fairly noticeable change too. I just find almost all the girls at that age just want to do drugs and party. I've never met a young woman that wanted to get married to an older man and start a family. You may have lucked out in the looks department or location? I can pull 30yo girls that are very attractive but yeah their expectations are unreasonable.
I'm not looking for sex though. I can find younger girls that will fuck me if I buy them stuff (wine/dine them and bring em to spas) but they don't want marriage. All of them have said the same thing. They want to fuck around while they're young and then think about marriage and kids later in life. A couple have even straight up said the highest age gap they'd want in a guy would be 5 years. I once discussed why this 18yo I was banging didn't want to have a serious relationship with me and she striaght up told me I'm too intellectually intimidating she put it. She said she felt like I'd be in control of everything and would be able to manipulate her without her even knowing because I just had too much life skills/wisdom than her so she prefers being with guys more on her level. For sex apparently that doesn't matter or is part of the turn on. A grandiose way of saying she likes to be in a relationship with a man she can control but she's not wrong about anything she said.
What I can't find is younger women that want kids+marriage.
Yup, that last sentence needs to be repeated 100x over.
you cannot fix female behavior via male self improvement
Yeah, with statistics this compelling, it's not just a simple "well just talk right, hit the gym, improve yourself and you can live happily ever after with your own modern Cinderella."
Yeah... No, doesn't work that way.
I can't say I share your experience. I make well over 6-figures, own a house, I'm well-travelled, I workout, I'm smarter than most people, I'm articulate and I'm funny. I haven't found a decent woman. It's not for a lack of trying either. I've looked in almost every nook and cranny imaginable too. Even tried joining a Mormon church to find a suitable wife. My latest idea was trying some Hutterite colony.
I think lots of people underestimate how important age is. You describe "girls are made into marriage material', well this is true but only girls are. Once a woman is passed ~25-30yo, she's no longer that mouldable. Your ideal age is as young as possible, so like ~18-20. This is specifically why corporations like to hire new-grads straight from university so the corporation can indoctrinate the young 22yo with as much corporate propaganda as possible to shape the person into a good little corporate drone. Did you know investment banks almost exclusively all refuse to hire 30yo+ people into analyst roles? Why? Because they can't shape the people into what they want. They find 30yos have already solidified into the kind of employee they're going to be for the rest of their life by then. They almost only hire 22yos exclusively. You need to do the same thing with women to make them good wives but you are competing with social media, their friend circles, the corporation they work for, hollywood, etc... and while you as the man likely will win-out in the beginning, as time goes on usually these women eventually leave your domination and obey some competing force. This is why it's extremely common to see 20yo girls from small towns get married then divorced by 30yo. They submitted to the man in the beginning then rebelled against the man in the end. This is why younger women are both ideal but also pose high risk because their loyalty to you can be subverted easily by outside influences, which women have much exposure to these day.
Everything I just said something a 20yo man has no hope of truly understanding nor do many even want to believe what I'm saying. My words are something only a 30yo+ man could truly grasp but then the ability to acquire a 20yo woman at my age is nearly impossible. Women closer to my age are already locked into the personality they're going to have for the rest of their life and I can't mould it much anymore so what you're saying about just be a good quality man and the woman will do whatever you want her to doesn't really hold true for men my age anymore.
If I knew what I know now 10 years ago I probably could have had a wife but I missed the boat.
I've often said this but no on seems to get it. As a man, you can usually improve yourself to be in the top 20% of men or there about, this is true but you can't make women any better. The issue is that the quality of women has come way down. There really aren't enough quality women out there. Think about this. Elon Musk, Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos can't even hold a wife down. You think you can?
The issue isn't that men need to try harder and you'll find a good woman, the issue is that there truly aren't any good women. Just some less bad than others.
If you're looking for sex, you can buy it cheaply enough or find it on Tinder cheaply etc... but finding a woman who is wife material is all but impossible even for the top 20% of men. The only men finding wives these days are men that get exploited by women so if you're a quality man who understands things, you can't accept such a relationship.
Russia doesn't like gays and trans.
It's pretty easy to do. Remove all laws against beating women. Force women to marry men. If the women misbehave, encourage men to beat the women. Make it illegal for women to earn an income. Segregate boys and girls from school. Teach women that their only purpose in life is to marry a man and have kids. Ensure the media these girls consume is all about loving and supporting men etc...
It can easily be done. It has been done many times before. The problem is that China doesn't actually want to do it. China still foolishly believes they can use women as wage slaves and get women to be baby makers too. Doesn't work. It's one or the other.
Dating is pretty much over. All quality people are no longer on dating apps. Birth rates keep going down. Relationships keep failing. There's no easy way to fix it like downloading an app. The problems are cultural.
Muslim women on tinder are as Muslim as a Zoomer who has never been to church is Christian.
China is quite interesting in this regard. China is the only country I've seen that acknowledges the problem of women but I share your sentiment. Every action taken by the Chinese government shows them underestimating the problem.
The only solution is a hard patriarchy.
Actually, the biggest problem right now is the fact that 99% of women are mediocre at any job they do. Even the doctors are mediocre. BUT academia + big corps are propping women up withy affirmative action in order to boost female numbers.
Men put in 300% effort with 300% competence and 300% the intelligence of what women do but then women still often get better career outcomes because of "affirmative action" which leads to relationships where women have inflated egos and want to be treated 50/50 or even revered because their career success has gone to their head. They don't respect the men because the men earn less than her so in her eyes that means he's less intelligent etc... when it's really just he doesn't have a vagina but the woman thinks she's oppressed and men have it easy. It leads to a terrible dynamic.