Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Don't call for murdering police officers and you won't get your comments removed.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 1 & Rule 2
It's always been the case here.
Actually it's one of the first comments that was made here.
Wishing for someone's death is wishing for violence.
True, but there is also no real consequence to my judgement besides being refused from a single forum.
I'm saying in general.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
You are also allowed to call each other fags!
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
You are allowed to call each other niggers.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
I don't see how.
Post Reported for: Fuck off, Imp
???
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - identity attacks
Comment Approved: Comments like that are, at most, so wrong-headed that it's silly. The denial of the existence of a population isn't really an attack on it, as much as it is a self admission that the conversation isn't grounded in an agreed upon reality anymore. Its a "Finland isn't real" level of argument.
Post Reported for: Conjecture
... ok
You realize that courts use texts, facebook posts, and other written expressions to determine intent and mens rea, right?
No system on Earth accepts the idea that because confusion is possible, written statements are inadmissible for the purpose of understanding intent.
Confusion is possible with other physical evidence too, like video recordings, and literally testifying on the stand in other cases.
That standard is so retarded, it would eliminate the entire concept of determining intent altogether. No human, anywhere, under any circumstance, can determine intent if you can't determine it from self-written statements.
If it were satire it's not likely going to be an issue. But, that has to be determined from context.
It's not a death threat, but it endorsing and glorifying the death of someone else, which is why it is also a violation of Rule 2, particularly enforced harshly when used against other users.
I read this as "I hope you get serious"
I am never going to accept that intent is not discernible through text. That is a retarded standard.
You are still wishing for someone's death.
You are allowed to disagree, but I appreciate you specifically taking the time out of your day to understand the enforcement. I want to be as transparent as possible so I appreciate the line of questions.
It would depend specifically on your intent. "I hope you get vaxxed and die" is as much of an endorsement of violence as "Since your unvaxxed, I hope you get covid and die".
Yes it would.
You're collectivists, I treat you as a collective.
Post Reported for: Rule 13 - Reposts
Unfortunately, even if it is, this has nearly 100 upvotes, so clearly some people hadn't seen the previous.