I don´t archive anything, I will post as I please. For 20 or 30 visits Scored might give them is it really worth to archive the link? I don´t think so. Most people never visit links, they only read the title.
Yeah, that’s what makes you the faggot. We’ve gone down this path before, where I point out to you that the importance is to make sure the BBC, or CNN, or CNBC, or whatever known unreliable, lying, leftist media institution you’ve linked today doesn’t just delete or edit the article later.
In response, you always say a bunch of dumb shit that completely misses or avoids the point.
Thus, I’m cutting to the chase and calling you a faggot.
Or do both - link the archive in the OP, and give a sauce link in the comment.
I will tell you this, some normie friends of mine refuse to read archive links. They're WAY more likely to click the link if the URL has the domain of their favorite propaganda site.
I know, it fucking sucks, but having both options is better than none IMO. I know a britbong UK fag that thinks Tommy Robinson is a literal Nazi and only links me gay bbc articles which I bitch at him about. If I link him GBnews or an archive he's gonna refuse to read it.
He's got a point. It's not about being petty about views. It's documentation for when some cunts decide to rewrite history to fit some new narrative. It happens quite often. I mean for fuck sake, you DO remember Covid, right?
Sorry I deleted the first post to fix the title before I realised somebody already commented on it. And yes British police are racist, they are describing the other dog they are looking for as "black" , not all black dogs are killers.
Can't they see? That dog is brown. The other dog they mention outstanding in the article is black. They did not kill a man, they were merely sharing their culture.
Archive link, because OP is a faggot.
I don´t archive anything, I will post as I please. For 20 or 30 visits Scored might give them is it really worth to archive the link? I don´t think so. Most people never visit links, they only read the title.
Yeah, that’s what makes you the faggot. We’ve gone down this path before, where I point out to you that the importance is to make sure the BBC, or CNN, or CNBC, or whatever known unreliable, lying, leftist media institution you’ve linked today doesn’t just delete or edit the article later.
In response, you always say a bunch of dumb shit that completely misses or avoids the point.
Thus, I’m cutting to the chase and calling you a faggot.
Or do both - link the archive in the OP, and give a sauce link in the comment.
I will tell you this, some normie friends of mine refuse to read archive links. They're WAY more likely to click the link if the URL has the domain of their favorite propaganda site.
I know, it fucking sucks, but having both options is better than none IMO. I know a britbong UK fag that thinks Tommy Robinson is a literal Nazi and only links me gay bbc articles which I bitch at him about. If I link him GBnews or an archive he's gonna refuse to read it.
Suck my dick, you are the faggot.
I’m just going to suggest that telling another man to suck your dick isn’t making you look less gay.
He's got a point. It's not about being petty about views. It's documentation for when some cunts decide to rewrite history to fit some new narrative. It happens quite often. I mean for fuck sake, you DO remember Covid, right?
I remember thousands of people dying from Covid and some conspiracy theory morons claiming that vaccines were harmful.
So...deliberately stupid AND a faggot.
Yes that... but I'm guessing you missed the parts where they said one thing, then said the fucking opposite a month later? Over and over?
It's the least we can do. Every click matters.
then stop posting.
Then you're a nigger that needs to be driven off because you don't even understand the purpose of archiving.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
You are allowed to call each other niggers.
This report only reinforces my opinion that OP is a stupid nigger who doesn't belong here.
Based DoM????
It's always been the case here.
Actually it's one of the first comments that was made here.
It's about the principle of the matter.
Repeating since the first post was deleted for some reason...
Sorry I deleted the first post to fix the title before I realised somebody already commented on it. And yes British police are racist, they are describing the other dog they are looking for as "black" , not all black dogs are killers.
He dindu nuffin...he's a good boy!
He wuz going to the park and sheet, he's got a litter at home.
My church need mo money fo dem trainin programs.
https://dailystormer.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/1408739130092.png
Meanwhile, nignogs and pakijeets can run around stabbing people with impunity
Can't they see? That dog is brown. The other dog they mention outstanding in the article is black. They did not kill a man, they were merely sharing their culture.
I guess brown dogs don't have the privileges brown humans have.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
I don't see how.
We have a leftist janitor in the comments lol
Good on the British Police, I can’t believe I’m saying that