22
AntonioOfVenice 22 points ago +22 / -0

FN and allies won the popular vote. Shove it in the face of everyone who starts complaining about that in US politics.

A few years of this chaos and people will flock to Le Pen as the presidential candidate.

This time the 'center-right' will not be able to play spoiler, because only 2 candidates advance to the second round rather than 3. (It refused to withdraw candidates as the anti-Le Pen bloc did to have the other ones win.)

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you say that a president 'needs to be removed from our society', then yes, because unqualified removal means removal from his position. From our society is, at the very least, liable to be reasonably interpreted as mass murder.

-1
AntonioOfVenice -1 points ago +1 / -2

Also Lucas has repeatedly said he doesn't call for violence.

Except that in this very thread, Elon Musk shows a tweet in which he does.

17
AntonioOfVenice 17 points ago +17 / -0

BREAKING NEWS: Epstein's friends jail you for 15 years if you burn their flag, while protecting you if you burn the national flag.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not at all. First of all, it's just Barcelona, and secondly, it's just discontent. It's not as if they're going and confronting tourists.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're obnoxious. Any place that has a large number of tourists has problems.

20
AntonioOfVenice 20 points ago +20 / -0

They're treating Biden now like they've treated Trump for 9 years: constant, relentless attacks in order to get him to do what they want.

Keep the faith, Joe.

-3
AntonioOfVenice -3 points ago +2 / -5

Ah yes, it was the nazis that led Germany to destruction and occupation.

How ignorant of history are you? Nazis took over Germany when it wasn't destroyed and occupied, and left it when it was.

The Allied powers were totally the good guys.

Since the Nazis failed even on their own terms, how monumentally stupid must you be to back them in 2024?

-11
AntonioOfVenice -11 points ago +5 / -16

Yet you replied, so it only ceases to matter wen you lose the debate.

Also, it's not an "opinion" that your Nazi heroes led Germany to destruction and occupation.

-13
AntonioOfVenice -13 points ago +6 / -19

The top part is Germans being ruled by blithering idiots who would lead it to destruction.

The bottom part is Germans being ruled by blithering idiots who would lead it to destruction.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +5 / -3

Great. So zionist is a 'proxy term'. Like 'woke' means 'black person' according to the radical left.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +3 / -1

That it won't achieve anything except hand dishonest people a list of names they can target for retribution.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wikipedia... is le not a source and therefore "you shilled wikipedia"

You already make that claim, and that was already addressed. Do keep up.

You can repeat it all you want but I'm the only one reading and I don't respect you.

Suit yourself.

I can tell you how to find the pdf

Did you find it? Then why didn't you use it?

by Telia
0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why is the title of the channel in Hebrew but the message in English?

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you had a PDF of the book in question, would you cite Wikipedia?

Yes? Then you're an idiot. I don't think you are. You're clearly clever enough to try to evade the subject as best as you can, and try to entice people to talk about something else.

So why did you cite Wikipedia? Because you do not have a PDF of the book.

It's OK to admit to mistakes.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe, but one is clearly an outgrowth of the other. The Jews at the time slaughtered lambs for forgiveness of sins, and Jesus is portrayed as the Passover lamb.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there a law against it? I doubt it. If there is, it's uncommonly silly. I don't regard any government as my overlord.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Several solid examples, and you just want to whine about the sketchy one and ignore the point.

The fact that someone believes something absurd says it all.

Also, I contest that they are 'solid example'. Hillary isn't a serial killer. She probably has the morals of one, but if you discount all the people she killed outside the US, there is zero evidence for any of those claims.

Apparently you still can't get over how wrong you were about the "safe and effective" jab.

Actually, what I said stood up rather well. But you are forgiven, you probably have no idea what I said and are just being presumptuous.

The only thing I was wrong about is that I didn't realize mRNA was unnecessary for quickly developing a vaccine, since other countries developed one just as fast, if not faster, without mRNA. So it's clear why mRNA was used.

And again, you want to talk about one case where people might have gotten it wrong and ignore the mountains of cases where they didn't.

If people make claims that the Corona-vaccine is responsible for a death of someone who did not even take it, and people who died before it was out (the first time-traveling vaccine, who went back in time along with the Russians who write Joy Reid's blog), that says everything about how seriously you should take the claims of those same people when they blame every last death on the Corona vaccine, with no evidence.

You always argue like a leftist troll.

As if after people calling me far-right for a decade, I care what you think I argue like.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

And what if you are mistaken about someone being a Muslim apologist?

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

But by the standard of 'functional society', the USSR would do better than San Francisco.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›