Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

66
()
posted 5 years ago by TheImpossible1 5 years ago by TheImpossible1 +66 / -0
92 comments share
92 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (92)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I get what you are trying to do with it, but I disagree entirely with the enforcement. All it does is lead to increasingly pol level memery. Banning specific ways of talk will just create coded talk, like the ((())) itself.

So unless you commit to banning it entirely as a topic all you do is push them further into zealotry by feeding a persecution complex, "shut it down the goyim know!" and force them to speak in such riddles they can only engage with others like them and then feed off each other in a personal echo chamber.

The rest of us cannot even have a normal discussion now, because we aren't versed enough in skirting the rules to engage with them and if we try it ourselves we end up breaking the rules. So in essence, its censorship with extra steps. Worse yet, it just drives people like most of us in KIA2 (anti-authority, pro-freedom esque) into their arms out of rebellion.

But you know all this.

One thing I do think the KIAPrime mods do right in this case, is rather than auto-delete things, most of the time they just say "hey cool it and have some decorum if you are gonna be on this topic." Which can go a long way in compromising freedom vs decency.

In that vein, I think there is a reasonable line that can be drawn between "just delete anything that says something too extreme" and "letting the place get owned by Stormfront." In the barely enforced wild west time this place has been in, its not become any of those hellholes you've described. We have one of these woman hate threads daily from him and its still mostly reasonable discussion anyway with some hateful energy off a few.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy