I'll be honest with you. It doesn't matter who is against this abomination and so on. I'll never ever agree to the normalization of child sexuality (I hate saying these words together) and pedophilia no matter who supports it or what ever pseudo science they use to justify it. I'll kill myself before I have to live in a world where pedos are encouraged and celebrated. No joke here. I feel a bit strongly on this topic.
Hence the problem. Both sides are sitting around creating pedophilia out of thin air and pointing at the opposite side, while claiming the incredibly contentious moral position that they're the ones who don't like pedophilia.
let alone something absurd like PizzaGate/PedoWood/Epstein shit or all this pedo normalization
Well the Catholic Church springs to mind.
But you miss the point. I was referring to the "phantom pedophilia" going on with both sides. Such as the left pointing at things like Uzaki-chan and screaming "Look at the pedos!" to all of the people on the other side pointing at things like Cuties and crying "Look at the pedos!" When both sides are just doing the same thing in those circumstances,
Epstein was a pedophile ring, Cuties is not anything remotely about or having to do with pedophilia. It's just a shitty movie that fails badly at portraying its message tastefully because the people making it are incompetent.
I feel like a movie with as much focus and cinematography on children acting sexual as Cuties is far above "big titty anime girl" on the justified pedo claim.
Even if the stated intention behind Cuties was legit, that's still 700 girls that got sexualized in the audition and those picked got extremely exposed to it and victimized by being made to act that way for the movie itself.
Like, you can fuck up an intention so badly you end up contributing to the very problem. PETA does it constantly. They don't have to have set out to contribute to some pedo conspiracy to have still made something that victimizes and normalizes all the same.
Because it isn't a "left-right" thing, at least, not any more. That's a relic of Cold War thinking. The lines have shifted, so that old-school "liberals" are now lumped in with the hard right over things that used to be considered very leftist (including colour-blindness, and actual animal welfare/rights issues, particularly where they clash with the WANTS of non-white human cultures.)
The Church and Hollywood aren't on different sides, they're competing for the same power slot, and the same hearts and minds, is all. Otherwise, Hollywood IS the new Church.
Every Catholic I know votes blue. Easily the most commonly leftist denomination from what I can tell. The pope is pretty much an SJW so I have issue with someone just flatly saying the Catholic church is "on the right."
That being said, I agree with what youre saying that people scrambling to label anything and everything pedophilia without any nuance whatsoever is starting to get very annoying (not necessarily saying this movie is an example of people wrongly doing this though). Legit there are people who would want me executed for not finding a slightly suggestive drawing or something of an underage anime character anything other than reprehensible. People are starting to get very cult-like in their fervor about it and it really is starting to resemble SJWs calling people Nazis. Even if there is way more actual pedophilia that needs to be cracked down on than there are actual Nazis in the world.
Side note, the movie advertised on the article link is nearly as messed up.
I mean, if Qtards are right about this, what else are they right about?
What is this heresy?...... REEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
Did somebody say heresy?
Literally nothing, because their whole ideology reads like a bad Hollywood movie.
They're not even right about this - this movie is immune to criticism because it was made by a female immigrant.
Wouldn't that be an ad hominem defense? Are Qtards making this argument?
No, they think it's immune because the elite want to normalize pedophilia because they're all pedos.
It's obvious that they protect it because it's literally from a diversity bingo winner.
Why can't both be true? They aren't mutually exclusive
Explain Epstein.
Not a Qtard, just have some common sense.
I'll be honest with you. It doesn't matter who is against this abomination and so on. I'll never ever agree to the normalization of child sexuality (I hate saying these words together) and pedophilia no matter who supports it or what ever pseudo science they use to justify it. I'll kill myself before I have to live in a world where pedos are encouraged and celebrated. No joke here. I feel a bit strongly on this topic.
Of course anti-pedo organizations are against it. They want to drum up support and donations.
I really wish people would grow the fuck up about this shitty movie. "Pedophila" is becoming the anti-SJW version of "Nazi!".
Hence the problem. Both sides are sitting around creating pedophilia out of thin air and pointing at the opposite side, while claiming the incredibly contentious moral position that they're the ones who don't like pedophilia.
Well the Catholic Church springs to mind.
But you miss the point. I was referring to the "phantom pedophilia" going on with both sides. Such as the left pointing at things like Uzaki-chan and screaming "Look at the pedos!" to all of the people on the other side pointing at things like Cuties and crying "Look at the pedos!" When both sides are just doing the same thing in those circumstances,
Epstein was a pedophile ring, Cuties is not anything remotely about or having to do with pedophilia. It's just a shitty movie that fails badly at portraying its message tastefully because the people making it are incompetent.
I feel like a movie with as much focus and cinematography on children acting sexual as Cuties is far above "big titty anime girl" on the justified pedo claim.
Even if the stated intention behind Cuties was legit, that's still 700 girls that got sexualized in the audition and those picked got extremely exposed to it and victimized by being made to act that way for the movie itself.
Like, you can fuck up an intention so badly you end up contributing to the very problem. PETA does it constantly. They don't have to have set out to contribute to some pedo conspiracy to have still made something that victimizes and normalizes all the same.
Because it isn't a "left-right" thing, at least, not any more. That's a relic of Cold War thinking. The lines have shifted, so that old-school "liberals" are now lumped in with the hard right over things that used to be considered very leftist (including colour-blindness, and actual animal welfare/rights issues, particularly where they clash with the WANTS of non-white human cultures.)
The Church and Hollywood aren't on different sides, they're competing for the same power slot, and the same hearts and minds, is all. Otherwise, Hollywood IS the new Church.
Every Catholic I know votes blue. Easily the most commonly leftist denomination from what I can tell. The pope is pretty much an SJW so I have issue with someone just flatly saying the Catholic church is "on the right."
That being said, I agree with what youre saying that people scrambling to label anything and everything pedophilia without any nuance whatsoever is starting to get very annoying (not necessarily saying this movie is an example of people wrongly doing this though). Legit there are people who would want me executed for not finding a slightly suggestive drawing or something of an underage anime character anything other than reprehensible. People are starting to get very cult-like in their fervor about it and it really is starting to resemble SJWs calling people Nazis. Even if there is way more actual pedophilia that needs to be cracked down on than there are actual Nazis in the world.
I have to disagree with you here.