This is why I’ve started to hear SJWs on the cutting edge of bullshit starting to use the term “racialized” instead of “minority” — because whites are in the minority in many urban centres now, and it conveniently allows them to group other high performing groups into the oppressor category.
Even the man complaining about this idiocy has accepted the false premise of “white people in power = bad”. He’s just mad about the dishonesty of the media in skewing the results of their bigoted study.
In reality, it makes perfect sense for the vast majority of elected officials in a majority white country to be white. That’s how democracy functions everywhere in the world.
What these “results” really tell us:
that democrats use “whiteness” as shorthand for non-leftist, and democrat racial grievances are actually just political theater
that the country will only be “fixed” when democracy elects the right proportion of leftists, which requires transforming the demographics of our electorate via immigration
that Jews count as white when decrying the “whiteness” of our political leadership, but any attempt to point this out or (god forbid) reduce the wildly disproportionate number of Jews in office would result in your immediate annihilation by the concerted efforts of everyone in media, entertainment, and government
BAME are just butt hurt their side lost in last few hundred years, if africans had suceeded in their countless invasions of Europe they would be celebrating their conquering heros.
In college in one of the university required social classes I had to take. The professor who kept going on and on about white man bad and the only reason minorities are poor is because white man. Got asked why it was that Asians are outperforming whites, his response.
“Asians are fast becoming the new white people”
So yes, they quite literally rebrand any minority that doesn’t fall inline as “white”
This is why I’ve started to hear SJWs on the cutting edge of bullshit starting to use the term “racialized” instead of “minority” — because whites are in the minority in many urban centres now, and it conveniently allows them to group other high performing groups into the oppressor category.
Even the man complaining about this idiocy has accepted the false premise of “white people in power = bad”. He’s just mad about the dishonesty of the media in skewing the results of their bigoted study.
In reality, it makes perfect sense for the vast majority of elected officials in a majority white country to be white. That’s how democracy functions everywhere in the world.
What these “results” really tell us:
that democrats use “whiteness” as shorthand for non-leftist, and democrat racial grievances are actually just political theater
that the country will only be “fixed” when democracy elects the right proportion of leftists, which requires transforming the demographics of our electorate via immigration
that Jews count as white when decrying the “whiteness” of our political leadership, but any attempt to point this out or (god forbid) reduce the wildly disproportionate number of Jews in office would result in your immediate annihilation by the concerted efforts of everyone in media, entertainment, and government
BAME are just butt hurt their side lost in last few hundred years, if africans had suceeded in their countless invasions of Europe they would be celebrating their conquering heros.
They're succeeding now while hardly firing a shot, from the looks of things, because Europe won't defend itself.
In college in one of the university required social classes I had to take. The professor who kept going on and on about white man bad and the only reason minorities are poor is because white man. Got asked why it was that Asians are outperforming whites, his response.
“Asians are fast becoming the new white people”
So yes, they quite literally rebrand any minority that doesn’t fall inline as “white”
But just 2% are Jewish right?
What, nobodies curious...why is it suddenly quiet?
Just tell me, is focusing on racial overrepresentation racist or not? I'm fine either way. Just choose one position and stick with it.
For true radical left, "white" was never about color of skin anyway, it was just a moniker for anyone in support of "white" (i.e. non-marxist) views.
Less radical and more stupid lefties confused it with skin color, which led to funny and not so funny consequences all over.
Well, yes and no. Even white leftists who continually flagellate themselves for being so privileged, fragile, and racist are still white.