The Washington Post thinks there are to many white man in science textbooks
(campusreform.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Cause you know when you think of a contribution to science and progress you must think of the sex and skin color of the inventor not the contribution. This in case there was someone on this planet who did not realize how racist washington post is.
And it's not even "Wow, non-whites and women suck!" racism. They discover that white men have done more than their fair share for scientific progress, and they think the problem is white men.
That's the problem with pursuing "equality" eventually you'll find that one group is more effective than others. Even if you tip the scales against them they might be better on average than other groups. In that case, the only way to make them "equal" in outcome is handicapping their success.
Diana Moon Glampers when?
Spiteful mutants.
I'm sure in their solipsistic mind every great scientific achievement and invention has some super secret genius minority, or woman, behind the scenes who was the real brains that made it happen.
As if this crap is ever going to make me feel ashamed of being the born the way I am, or that I'll somehow feel guilty for shit I had nothing to do with. It's all so fucking silly.
Also, when you think of a contribution to science and progress, you think of journalists. Thank you bloggers and liberal art flunkies for your valuable input about the hard sciences