Foucault went hard against psychology. His followers took that as orders to capture it, and they did so swiftly. It was taken internally, while subjects like history were taken externally through vampire fields like social science.
At this point between Simon De Beauvoir, John Money and Foucault its hard to make an argument that the soft sciences weren't heavily dogmatic on Marxism and Pedophilia
But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality
That quote comes from a 1978 talk with him, Guy Hocquenghem, and Jean Danet. It was a result of a petition he and a bunch of other commies(Derrida, de Beauvoir, Sartre, etc) signed in 1977 to legalize raping infants.
Foucault went hard against psychology. His followers took that as orders to capture it, and they did so swiftly. It was taken internally, while subjects like history were taken externally through vampire fields like social science.
When it comes to prominent Marxist psychologists, it's easier to list the ones that aren't pedophiles.
At this point between Simon De Beauvoir, John Money and Foucault its hard to make an argument that the soft sciences weren't heavily dogmatic on Marxism and Pedophilia
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality
That quote comes from a 1978 talk with him, Guy Hocquenghem, and Jean Danet. It was a result of a petition he and a bunch of other commies(Derrida, de Beauvoir, Sartre, etc) signed in 1977 to legalize raping infants.