So for those who are out of the loop, r/ActualPublicFreakouts formed from the frustration of non-public freakouts were becoming more common on the original subreddit. As of late there has become a more noticeable shift in what types of posts get to the top of the pages. I've also seen comments in passing the past few months accusing r/ActualPublicFreakouts being full of racist nazis in other subreddits.
The question is how long before a move to censor or outright ban the spin off subreddit since the political and cultural shift goes against the Reddit group think.
Oh I 100% understand pattern recognition. And you're getting closer. What type of men in that age range commit more violent crime than all other groups put together?
We want to be accurate, don't we?
It's not just "men". It's a specific subgroup of men. The most correlated category in all violent crime is....
Here's a hint: Biden says they lose their racial identity if they don't vote for him.
Ones with previous criminal history
We are being accurate: Men. Don't let the savages out. You know what they say: around men, never relax. That's how women keep themselves safe. They'll kill you for just saying no to them. Can you imagine a world where women could walk around at night safe because men could be curfewed for the benefit of society? I don't have to bring out the bowl of M&M's meme again do I?
Yes it is, the only other relevant factor is age. Men under the age of 14 don't commit rape too often. And Men over the age of 40 finally start deciding that raping women walking down the street is a young man's game, and considering the amount of women who still have to deal with pervs like Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and Harvey Wienstein; even that isn't a guarantee.
But I can see where you are going: you're trying to blame Pakistani Men for raping all those English girls. But that's just you cherry picking. You're ignoring the fact that White Men commit the most acts of pedophillia in England. You're ignoring the hate fact that the most likely person to rape or kill a woman is her boyfriend, husband, brother, husband, or son. You're ignoring the hate fact that every major religion has needed reform in teaching their men not to rape or beat their wives. You're willing to condemn some rape cultures, by letting others go. You're letting some men off the hook because you don't like them. You want to say #NotAllMen because you want to protect some men and not other, while ignoring the crimes that are almost exclusive to men as a whole.
You just want to sweep over the crimes of your gender and blame it on someone else, but I won't. You're all guilty by action if not guilty by complicity, promotion, tolerance, rationalization, or silencing of your gender's victim's voices.
#YesAllMen
Men, and I'm not being sarcastic this time. It is men. No other category is a stronger correlate to violent behavior.
You have no problem blaming all men, but refuse to address the specific category of men responsible for most of it.
Despite being 6% of the population, black men commit 57% of all violent crime.
Mathematically, that's actually a stronger correlation than 50% doing 95%.
And another interesting note: 85-95% of men in jail are raised by single moms. Look it up if you don't believe me.
One of the strongest factors for commiting a crime and going to jail, is not having a male parent and only being raised by a woman.
So according to your logic.... let's blame women. All of them. Because they are responsible for divorcing men and making their sons into criminals.
And if you are still so adamant about blaming all men for being the main commiters of violent crime...
then you should blame all black men for being responsible for most of that violence and skewing the statistics for the other 94% of men.
But you won't do that because you're a hypocrite, who just wants to use incomplete data to have an excuse to hate "men" in general, without saying the word "black", or "bad parent" because you don't want to be racist or sexist.
It is absolutely ridiculous to place blame on one group because of a correlation of violence, while ignoring the subgroup that has a much higher correlation and thus skews the statistics for the whole group in general
Why would I care what percentage of missing chromosome genetic failures is slightly more or less savage than the other savages.
Except your citing one country, one time, one place, one culture. 50% of the population of every society through time and space engaging in 90% or more of all violent behavior, and nearly 100% of the most heinous violent behavior, is a far stronger corollary. Worse, controlling for factors like education, wealth, culture, status, IQ, and even family upbringing still doesn't change the disparity. Choose whatever category you want. When you start controlling for factors like that, the disparity of violence flattens out with only two exceptions: age and sex. Sex being the stronger corollary of the two by far.
Nope, the strongest corollary of all is sex. Not family. This isn't arguable, it's genetic.
No need to. Men need to learn how to live in a civilized society. Someone's gonna tell them no, so they're gonna just have to learn how to not rape a woman when she says "No." That is the most dangerous thing a woman can say: "No", to a man. Around men, never relax.
So that what? So that If black men were to become less violent you could then deflect your entire gender's collective responsibility onto another race? Or another political affiliation? Or a religion? The problem isn't one race, or one ideology, or one philosophy. It's one sex. Just because a black man won't rape a woman, doesn't mean a white man won't take his place the first chance he gets. Stop deflecting responsibility for the crimes of your sex by blaming one group of men more than another, especially when no group of men is less violent than any group of women.
Oh god he's so close to getting it...
THAT'S IT! THINK IT THROUGH!
GOD DAMNIT YOU WERE SO CLOSE!
You're a troll. No one could be this obtuse. Good job, had me fooled for a minute there.