What's interesting is that he is actually projecting what black people tend to do onto white people. The lack of compassion, the murders, the assaults, the rapes, are overwhelmingly black. If you're going to make a genetic argument, it must be supported by facts and data. If Cannon wants to go there with his Nation of Islam BS, then he must come to the right conclusion using data rather than backing the idea that numbers are racist and white people are racist for what many black people do.
Black supremacy is more dangerous than white supremacy ever was. I've never met an open white supremacist in my entire life. I've met dozens of black supremacists and their culture is becoming mainstream. When celebrities, companies, and governments are all pushing it, it becomes one of the most dangerous ideologies possible, because it spreads to where the black supremacists can be encountered (which is virtually anywhere) and homogenous societies will encourage it in the name of diversity.
Black supremacy is more dangerous than white supremacy ever was.
No, that's genuinely dumb. Black Supremacism is more dangerous now than White Supremacism is now. Hell, it might be more dangerous to blacks (specifically) now than White Supremacism is to blacks now.
As of yet, Black Supremacism has yet to promote mass sterilization programs as modern medicine, it has yet to intentionally attempt to eradicate entire cultures and histories (the way that Native American boarding schools & reservations attempted and nearly succeeded in eradicating tribal societies), and Black Supremacism hasn't been made so institutionally complete in whole regions of the US that Black Supremacists governments have failed to stop illegal hangings of non-blacks due to overwhelming public support and the institutionalization of extrajudicial murders as a cultural focal point.
Black Supremacism, being a fairly recent, and almost western ideology, hasn't had the kind of time to commit the same level of horrors as White Supremacism.
You didn't describe white supremacism. Jews don't think of themselves as white. The integration of tribes to conform to American values isn't white supremacy either. White supremacism was institutionally complete in the same way black supremacism is now as well with regards to lynchings. Maybe more so. The ideas that we must give them more protections and change policies all over our countries just to suit them while being open to whatever "punishment" they decide are already taking effect and will continue to get worse.
Somalians killing people in the US, even as police who should have helped a rape victim is a reality. Defunding the police, leaving areas for black supremacists to destroy and loot, and even kneeling in submission to them have all already happened.
The concept is not recent and it's certainly not Western.
Don't call other comments dumb, especially when you fail to make a point.
From what I've seen, he doesn't condemn black supremacy. He just wants it to be less overt. He had a previous tweet implying that they should leave a few white people alive.
The theory of evolution truly is revolutionary. The commies are extreme calvinist fundies that still oppose that fact of reality. Their fervor has only grown since the infamous scopes trial. If we are going to pick a degenerate, genetically deficient, animalistic race using the left's framework, it is going to be the people that were purposefully bred to be retarded labor, blacks.
people that were purposefully bred to be retarded labor, blacks.
Really breeding in traits requires more generations than blacks were enslaved in America. And eugenics wasn't really practiced on slaves -- they were generally pretty much free to marry (other slaves) at will.
Regardless, there are definitely biological traits and other "averages" across different racial populations. However, the variance between individuals in those groups is much, much greater.
Let's just avoid this racially collectivist bullshit altogether. It's racist when whites do it, and it's racist when blacks do it. We aren't marxists.
Let's just avoid this racially collectivist bullshit altogether.
I couldn't agree more, but don't be afraid to seriously consider the left's approach to policy and the effects of its most reasonable, prudent application in reality. You can't expose these insane religious zealots otherwise.
This is that religious zeal I was talking about. You got triggered.
If we are going to pick a degenerate, genetically deficient, animalistic race using the left's framework
You are still using their immoral framework. Don't allow opportunistic psychopaths to dictate your morality.
Skin tone isn't a useful data point. It is actively harmful to even collect such data as it forces those categories into existence. Citizenship and assimilation into a culture that promotes heirarchal meritocracies would be good categories.
If thou writes a phrase that, taken in isolation without its surrounding context comes off sounding incredibly racist, then in my view the language centers of thy brain let that fly. Thou thought "nah, thy bases are covered by the surrounding context, so it's good", and I don't agree with that at all. I believe if thou can say something like that, at some subconscious level, thy brain actually said "sounds good." That thou said it because at some fundamental level thou believe it, even if at some higher cognitive/moral level thou disagree with it and thy overarching sentence is saying as such.
That is a lot of words to call me a sinner. Tell me more about my crimethink.
We have systematically removed sympathy from people. If you can't figure out the positive spin for every side in a fight, political or otherwise, you will never understand conflict.
I called you a hypocrite and it only took me eight. All the rest was to tell you WHY, because if a person doesn't understand why then they can't learn.
I'm criticizing your linguistic flippancy. I'm saying nothing about the overarching thrust of your argument.
Let's just avoid this racially collectivist bullshit altogether. It's racist when whites do it, and it's racist when blacks do it. We aren't marxists.
Unfortunately, it's a survival strategy, so its adoption is going to increase, not decrease, as long as there's a perceived threat.
Just as corruption in politics creates alliances of convenience between the corrupt (while honest men and women are isolated), the politics of race is a path to power, and ignoring it when others are engaging in it endangers us.
It would be very healthy for our collective conscience to put the guns down and walk away from this sick Mexican Standoff, but we've spent most of our time in the circle getting shot at and not shooting back. Unilaterally opting out doesn't mean we get to walk away; it only means we leave our revolvers in their holsters, and that's not any more healthy for our collective physique than participating is for our national conscience.
Unfortunately, it's a survival strategy, so its adoption is going to increase, not decrease, as long as there's a perceived threat.
It's not a survival strategy. It's power-gaining strategy that creates an other and establishes them as a perceived threat. The perception never ends, because if it did, racialism would stop being a viable means to power.
Best of all, it ends with everyone being worse off, including the population that's supposed to benefit from the racism.
The classic game theory example of the prisoner's dilemma works well enough as an example. We've been through thousands upon thousands of iterations of the same game, and every time, both prisoners expect the other to betray them, because that is how it always happens.
The first to choose cooperation instead of betrayal will be destroyed, unless they make the leap together.
Asking someone to make the leap on the first iteration is a tough sell. Asking them to make it on the millionth, when generation after generation preceding chose betrayal, is nearly impossible.
Islam is a cancer. Poorly-understood, divorced-from-history-and-reality, Black Supremacist, (Nation of) Islam is a cancerous outgrowth of the original cancer.
"The only way that they [the melanin deficiant] can act is evil"
Yeah, real compassionate you fuckhole.
We call it soul. Soul Brothers and sisters.
Ignorant racist retarded fuckstick.
"Soul Brother" is a term that originated in the black DJ community in the early era of Rock and Roll when Black DJ's were playing early Rock & Roll and Rockabilly music to black audiences who were responding to it well. However, many blacks didn't want to listen to "white music" so there was a stigma in black communities about listening to white musicians, or even integrated bands.
In order for black DJ's to not focus on the fact that white vocalists were singing what their audience considered "black music"... soul music. They called the white vocalists *Soul Brothers". As in, instead of referring to whites as "Brothers", which would be inappropriate, they referred to white vocalists as "Soul Brothers".
Soul Brother is a term that was created by blacks to refer to white people you dipshit.
What's interesting is that he is actually projecting what black people tend to do onto white people. The lack of compassion, the murders, the assaults, the rapes, are overwhelmingly black. If you're going to make a genetic argument, it must be supported by facts and data. If Cannon wants to go there with his Nation of Islam BS, then he must come to the right conclusion using data rather than backing the idea that numbers are racist and white people are racist for what many black people do.
Black supremacy is more dangerous than white supremacy ever was. I've never met an open white supremacist in my entire life. I've met dozens of black supremacists and their culture is becoming mainstream. When celebrities, companies, and governments are all pushing it, it becomes one of the most dangerous ideologies possible, because it spreads to where the black supremacists can be encountered (which is virtually anywhere) and homogenous societies will encourage it in the name of diversity.
The left always projects
No, that's genuinely dumb. Black Supremacism is more dangerous now than White Supremacism is now. Hell, it might be more dangerous to blacks (specifically) now than White Supremacism is to blacks now.
As of yet, Black Supremacism has yet to promote mass sterilization programs as modern medicine, it has yet to intentionally attempt to eradicate entire cultures and histories (the way that Native American boarding schools & reservations attempted and nearly succeeded in eradicating tribal societies), and Black Supremacism hasn't been made so institutionally complete in whole regions of the US that Black Supremacists governments have failed to stop illegal hangings of non-blacks due to overwhelming public support and the institutionalization of extrajudicial murders as a cultural focal point.
Black Supremacism, being a fairly recent, and almost western ideology, hasn't had the kind of time to commit the same level of horrors as White Supremacism.
You didn't describe white supremacism. Jews don't think of themselves as white. The integration of tribes to conform to American values isn't white supremacy either. White supremacism was institutionally complete in the same way black supremacism is now as well with regards to lynchings. Maybe more so. The ideas that we must give them more protections and change policies all over our countries just to suit them while being open to whatever "punishment" they decide are already taking effect and will continue to get worse.
Somalians killing people in the US, even as police who should have helped a rape victim is a reality. Defunding the police, leaving areas for black supremacists to destroy and loot, and even kneeling in submission to them have all already happened.
The concept is not recent and it's certainly not Western.
Don't call other comments dumb, especially when you fail to make a point.
Terry Crews proven right.
How so?
A couple weeks ago he was mobbed on twitter for sayin that it was important that "Black Lives Matter" not turn into "Black Lives Better".
He got called an uncle tom and a coon and a house nigger as the mob insisted that wasn't happening.
Here we see quite plainly that it is exactly what is happening.
From what I've seen, he doesn't condemn black supremacy. He just wants it to be less overt. He had a previous tweet implying that they should leave a few white people alive.
The theory of evolution truly is revolutionary. The commies are extreme calvinist fundies that still oppose that fact of reality. Their fervor has only grown since the infamous scopes trial. If we are going to pick a degenerate, genetically deficient, animalistic race using the left's framework, it is going to be the people that were purposefully bred to be retarded labor, blacks.
Really breeding in traits requires more generations than blacks were enslaved in America. And eugenics wasn't really practiced on slaves -- they were generally pretty much free to marry (other slaves) at will.
Regardless, there are definitely biological traits and other "averages" across different racial populations. However, the variance between individuals in those groups is much, much greater.
Let's just avoid this racially collectivist bullshit altogether. It's racist when whites do it, and it's racist when blacks do it. We aren't marxists.
I couldn't agree more, but don't be afraid to seriously consider the left's approach to policy and the effects of its most reasonable, prudent application in reality. You can't expose these insane religious zealots otherwise.
If you actually did you wouldn't have made the reply he was responding to.
This is that religious zeal I was talking about. You got triggered.
You are still using their immoral framework. Don't allow opportunistic psychopaths to dictate your morality.
Skin tone isn't a useful data point. It is actively harmful to even collect such data as it forces those categories into existence. Citizenship and assimilation into a culture that promotes heirarchal meritocracies would be good categories.
Thou wants religious zeal?
So why did thou use it?
All I'm saying is thou art a hypocrite.
If thou writes a phrase that, taken in isolation without its surrounding context comes off sounding incredibly racist, then in my view the language centers of thy brain let that fly. Thou thought "nah, thy bases are covered by the surrounding context, so it's good", and I don't agree with that at all. I believe if thou can say something like that, at some subconscious level, thy brain actually said "sounds good." That thou said it because at some fundamental level thou believe it, even if at some higher cognitive/moral level thou disagree with it and thy overarching sentence is saying as such.
That is a lot of words to call me a sinner. Tell me more about my crimethink.
We have systematically removed sympathy from people. If you can't figure out the positive spin for every side in a fight, political or otherwise, you will never understand conflict.
I called you a hypocrite and it only took me eight. All the rest was to tell you WHY, because if a person doesn't understand why then they can't learn.
I'm criticizing your linguistic flippancy. I'm saying nothing about the overarching thrust of your argument.
Unfortunately, it's a survival strategy, so its adoption is going to increase, not decrease, as long as there's a perceived threat.
Just as corruption in politics creates alliances of convenience between the corrupt (while honest men and women are isolated), the politics of race is a path to power, and ignoring it when others are engaging in it endangers us.
It would be very healthy for our collective conscience to put the guns down and walk away from this sick Mexican Standoff, but we've spent most of our time in the circle getting shot at and not shooting back. Unilaterally opting out doesn't mean we get to walk away; it only means we leave our revolvers in their holsters, and that's not any more healthy for our collective physique than participating is for our national conscience.
It's not a survival strategy. It's power-gaining strategy that creates an other and establishes them as a perceived threat. The perception never ends, because if it did, racialism would stop being a viable means to power.
Best of all, it ends with everyone being worse off, including the population that's supposed to benefit from the racism.
The classic game theory example of the prisoner's dilemma works well enough as an example. We've been through thousands upon thousands of iterations of the same game, and every time, both prisoners expect the other to betray them, because that is how it always happens.
The first to choose cooperation instead of betrayal will be destroyed, unless they make the leap together.
Asking someone to make the leap on the first iteration is a tough sell. Asking them to make it on the millionth, when generation after generation preceding chose betrayal, is nearly impossible.
Must have been unbearable for him to be around all those i̶n̶f̶l̶u̶e̶n̶t̶i̶a̶l non-melanated folk on America's Got Talent.
Islam is a cancer. Poorly-understood, divorced-from-history-and-reality, Black Supremacist, (Nation of) Islam is a cancerous outgrowth of the original cancer.
It's more dangerous than Communism.
Nothing about the NOI is Islamic. It's just a cult supporting a pedophile.
...
Hmm. ... Okay, I see your point.
But what I'm saying is that the NOI has nothing to do with the actual teachings of Islamic scripture.
"Melanin comes with compassion"
"The only way that they [the melanin deficiant] can act is evil"
Yeah, real compassionate you fuckhole.
Ignorant racist retarded fuckstick.
"Soul Brother" is a term that originated in the black DJ community in the early era of Rock and Roll when Black DJ's were playing early Rock & Roll and Rockabilly music to black audiences who were responding to it well. However, many blacks didn't want to listen to "white music" so there was a stigma in black communities about listening to white musicians, or even integrated bands.
In order for black DJ's to not focus on the fact that white vocalists were singing what their audience considered "black music"... soul music. They called the white vocalists *Soul Brothers". As in, instead of referring to whites as "Brothers", which would be inappropriate, they referred to white vocalists as "Soul Brothers".
Soul Brother is a term that was created by blacks to refer to white people you dipshit.
Comment Reported for: 16: Identity attacks
Comment Removed.
Comment Reported for: 16: Identity attacks
Comment Removed.
.cucked