If thou writes a phrase that, taken in isolation without its surrounding context comes off sounding incredibly racist, then in my view the language centers of thy brain let that fly. Thou thought "nah, thy bases are covered by the surrounding context, so it's good", and I don't agree with that at all. I believe if thou can say something like that, at some subconscious level, thy brain actually said "sounds good." That thou said it because at some fundamental level thou believe it, even if at some higher cognitive/moral level thou disagree with it and thy overarching sentence is saying as such.
That is a lot of words to call me a sinner. Tell me more about my crimethink.
We have systematically removed sympathy from people. If you can't figure out the positive spin for every side in a fight, political or otherwise, you will never understand conflict.
I called you a hypocrite and it only took me eight. All the rest was to tell you WHY, because if a person doesn't understand why then they can't learn.
I'm criticizing your linguistic flippancy. I'm saying nothing about the overarching thrust of your argument.
Thou wants religious zeal?
So why did thou use it?
All I'm saying is thou art a hypocrite.
If thou writes a phrase that, taken in isolation without its surrounding context comes off sounding incredibly racist, then in my view the language centers of thy brain let that fly. Thou thought "nah, thy bases are covered by the surrounding context, so it's good", and I don't agree with that at all. I believe if thou can say something like that, at some subconscious level, thy brain actually said "sounds good." That thou said it because at some fundamental level thou believe it, even if at some higher cognitive/moral level thou disagree with it and thy overarching sentence is saying as such.
That is a lot of words to call me a sinner. Tell me more about my crimethink.
We have systematically removed sympathy from people. If you can't figure out the positive spin for every side in a fight, political or otherwise, you will never understand conflict.
I called you a hypocrite and it only took me eight. All the rest was to tell you WHY, because if a person doesn't understand why then they can't learn.
I'm criticizing your linguistic flippancy. I'm saying nothing about the overarching thrust of your argument.
Words are the problem? You sound triggered.
Words are a mirror into the soul.
Consider the President. I voted for Trump, because I agree with his policy positions, and will vote for him again on the basis of those policies.
I also absolutely believe him to be a sexist, racist bigot.