I post this not because I believe it, but because there's mention of the flu's IFR.
.1%.
This is going to end up with the same IFR, once we get even more tests done, and find out tons more people have it, and it's not that bad.
Note, excess deaths now are the harvesting effect, and due to cuomo et all killing 50k people from sending infected into nursing homes intentionally.
Lastly, antibody testing is only effective if antibodies are present, the limit for the wuflu appears to be 6 weeks, give or take. So if I had it 2 months ago, say, I wouldn't show positive even though I had it and got over it.
No, the wuflu panic is insane for anyone who does more than a modicum of reasearch.
Just saying, to get 130k dead with a .1% IFR, it would mean ~35% of the US has already had it. I just don't see it. Also, 130k is pretty lowball compared to the overall excess mortality in the recent time frame. I think we'll be lucky to see it settle at .5, with ~.7-1 being more likely. If your right, we should see herd immunity in a couple months, though. So there's that.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
Deadlier than the flu, certainly. Also, the best chance we've ever had to keep social security solvent.
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-covid-19-isnt-the-flu
I post this not because I believe it, but because there's mention of the flu's IFR.
.1%.
This is going to end up with the same IFR, once we get even more tests done, and find out tons more people have it, and it's not that bad.
Note, excess deaths now are the harvesting effect, and due to cuomo et all killing 50k people from sending infected into nursing homes intentionally.
Lastly, antibody testing is only effective if antibodies are present, the limit for the wuflu appears to be 6 weeks, give or take. So if I had it 2 months ago, say, I wouldn't show positive even though I had it and got over it.
No, the wuflu panic is insane for anyone who does more than a modicum of reasearch.
It's not. It's already killed 4 times the amount a normal flu season does, despite lockdowns and shit.
We want it to be, because muh freedom from masks and to grill n sheeit, but it's worse than the flu, that's pretty certain.
Because cuomo et al killed 50k people, but sure.
It won't be worse than the flu, in the end. This just spreads more. That's why we use the IFR.
Just saying, to get 130k dead with a .1% IFR, it would mean ~35% of the US has already had it. I just don't see it. Also, 130k is pretty lowball compared to the overall excess mortality in the recent time frame. I think we'll be lucky to see it settle at .5, with ~.7-1 being more likely. If your right, we should see herd immunity in a couple months, though. So there's that.