‘The Odyssey’ Is the WORST Movie Ever Made
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
You are a liar, you not only believe lies but profess them and demand others adhere. You've lied about a dozen times in the conversation so far.
And of course you believe in the silly atheist dogma of evolution. Conclusively disproven by now, as it turns out that they'd just been hand waving the math for more than a century. Darwin may just have been history's greatest liar. That or Hawkins, but that has yet to be seen.
I don't demand shit, Kaarous. I've never told you what to do. If you want to be a drooling retard, be a drooling retard. It's no skin off my nuts.
Look, genetic studies prove very conclusively that grizzly bears wandered up north and the pigment of their fur changed to blend into the snow better and their metabolism changed to favor fish and now they're polar bears. You don't want to believe it? Fine, but all the evidence is there, and you're just a caveman dancing around the campfire clapping your retard hand over your mouth as you sing songs to the rain.
Congrats, you're innumerate too I suppose. Not to mention that if you don't know what fixation is you're unqualified to talk about this.
But in fairness to you, I already knew that you didn't understand the subject and you were just spouting conclusively disproven atheist dogma.
Let me go ahead and break things down like I was talking to a child.
What is the necessary number of fixed mutations to bridge the gap between chimp and human, how often do fixed mutations occur, and does the product of combining those two numbers fit into the given time frame?
I already answered that.
Chimps and humans are cousins. They share a common ancestor. They diverged about seven milion years ago, possibly from Sahelanthropus tchadensis, and possibly not. No one is sure.
"Necessary number of fixed mutations" is not a phrase that any scientist would recognize, and mutation is not the main driver of evolution in animals that reproduce sexually.
You're being retarded again.
It's either a real number, or it doesn't exist. How many?
lol, you dumb fucking inbred hick, that question doesn't even make any sense.
What's the required mutation rate for a new species? How many generations?
It's when the new species no longer breeds with the old species.
It's a little blurry. A coyote can breed with a domestic dog; they just don't want to. A horse can breed with a donkey, the offspring will just be infertile.
Species is just: this population now only breeds with itself, whether they could choose otherwise or not.
You did not answer any such thing.
The necessary time to bridge the genetic variance gap is in the billions of years by the way.
And at this point you're just lying to avoid actually having to do the math. Far from the first atheist to do so when confronted with the reality that their beliefs are a silly lie.
No, that's retarded.
It might be true that it would take billions of years to bridge the gap if you rejected the concept of sexual reproduction and relied entirely on mutation caused by radiation damage.
But, you know, that was the entire point of sexual reproduction - to speed up the rate of evolution. If evolution weren't real, there would be zero reason for any species to have sex.
Not even close, and it you don't know what fixation is then you have a child's understanding of genetics.
You're not intellectually tall enough for this ride.
I worked in a biology lab for a decade. I can recognize that the words you're speaking aren't related in any way to any real science; they're cultist partisan bullshit from your cultist partisan cult. You, yourself, don't actually know anything at all.