The reason the movie got banned is because the judge character in the movie is a composite of actual judges -- using their actual quotes as dialogue -- that have actually defended rapefugees. The censor's arguments is that the movie encourages people to go after those officials.
So was I, until I actually watched it. Uwe Boll has been making movies for over 35 years and still hasn't learned how to write characters, dialogue, subtext, build a narrative, pace a scene ... well, you know. It's like he's never seen any movies other than his own.
I think we're all hoping for "Man on Fire" ... but this ain't it.
Armie's character actually kills more cops than rapefugees. Most of the runtime is wasted, in typical fashion, with shots of Armie Hammer walking, or the police driving around town looking for him, or (the same!) bodies being carried away by EMTs again and again, or revisiting (the same!) crime scene again and again in an illogical order. Did the cops leave all the bodies there and then come back the next day to have another conversation about what Hammer did the day before?
Otherwise, it's a whole lot of Armie pontificating what we've all been talking about here for the past decade ... and not very well, either. There is one "trick" that Boll must have taken from the German heist thriller Die Katze to keep the audience's attention -- though that's probably giving him too much credit -- which is to throw in a very performative and entirely unnecessary sex scene to break up all the meandering walking/ talking.
Anyhow, the "noise" around this movie is more valuable than the movie itself. The Eurocuck censors are keeping The Streisand Effect alive and well. Had they just ignored it, nobody would have noticed this movie's existence, but they just had to REEEE about it, as usual. The censors once again put a huge spotlight on the thing they wanted everyone to not notice or talk about, so for that we can be grateful.
Law Abiding Citizen made a lot of people get real comfortable with ballistic checks and balances so they had to give it the gayest ending in order to be released. Boll probably got the same request and told the editors to swallow a bullet so now his movie about killing the fucking faggots in charge gets banned by the fucking faggots in charge.
I watched it tonight. It is a caricature, and is typical Uwe Boll trash.
Enjoy this movie for the press it generates, not for the actual quality of the film.
Just once I want to see someone competent in film making make a video for our side. This garbage isn't it.
Yeah AI is rapidly getting better. Skilled filmmakers will be able to put something competent together with the tools we have now and supplemental post-production effects. We just need ACTUAL skilled filmmakers on our side to make the films -- while I appreciate Uwe Boll has the right perspective on things, he just isn't skilled enough to get the message out there in a competent way.
The Cartman marketing make something appear so edgy or scarce that people want it. And yet I havent found one free stream of this yet. So you would have no way of seeing it anyway if it was banned in the EU.
Don't. All the platforms (Google, Apple, etc.) selling it hate us. It doesn't make sense to "protest" them by giving them money to produce yet more race-swapped propaganda. I "borrowed" it online. It's actually pretty bad.
I want to see a movie where the NGO and government officials that make mass importation possible get wacked in a public and grotesque fashion.
The reason the movie got banned is because the judge character in the movie is a composite of actual judges -- using their actual quotes as dialogue -- that have actually defended rapefugees. The censor's arguments is that the movie encourages people to go after those officials.
... which they absolutely deserve anyhow.
Well, we've known for a while now that Law Abiding Citizen was the instruction manual on how to deal with judges who let criminals walk free.
I never thought I would be looking forward to a Uwe Boll film.
So was I, until I actually watched it. Uwe Boll has been making movies for over 35 years and still hasn't learned how to write characters, dialogue, subtext, build a narrative, pace a scene ... well, you know. It's like he's never seen any movies other than his own.
I think we're all hoping for "Man on Fire" ... but this ain't it.
Armie's character actually kills more cops than rapefugees. Most of the runtime is wasted, in typical fashion, with shots of Armie Hammer walking, or the police driving around town looking for him, or (the same!) bodies being carried away by EMTs again and again, or revisiting (the same!) crime scene again and again in an illogical order. Did the cops leave all the bodies there and then come back the next day to have another conversation about what Hammer did the day before?
Otherwise, it's a whole lot of Armie pontificating what we've all been talking about here for the past decade ... and not very well, either. There is one "trick" that Boll must have taken from the German heist thriller Die Katze to keep the audience's attention -- though that's probably giving him too much credit -- which is to throw in a very performative and entirely unnecessary sex scene to break up all the meandering walking/ talking.
Anyhow, the "noise" around this movie is more valuable than the movie itself. The Eurocuck censors are keeping The Streisand Effect alive and well. Had they just ignored it, nobody would have noticed this movie's existence, but they just had to REEEE about it, as usual. The censors once again put a huge spotlight on the thing they wanted everyone to not notice or talk about, so for that we can be grateful.
Law Abiding Citizen made a lot of people get real comfortable with ballistic checks and balances so they had to give it the gayest ending in order to be released. Boll probably got the same request and told the editors to swallow a bullet so now his movie about killing the fucking faggots in charge gets banned by the fucking faggots in charge.
I watched it tonight. It is a caricature, and is typical Uwe Boll trash. Enjoy this movie for the press it generates, not for the actual quality of the film.
Just once I want to see someone competent in film making make a video for our side. This garbage isn't it.
At the rate that AI keep improving -- check out The Dor Brothers' work -- I'm looking forward to seeing a "Man on Fire" type of film.
Yeah AI is rapidly getting better. Skilled filmmakers will be able to put something competent together with the tools we have now and supplemental post-production effects. We just need ACTUAL skilled filmmakers on our side to make the films -- while I appreciate Uwe Boll has the right perspective on things, he just isn't skilled enough to get the message out there in a competent way.
The Cartman marketing make something appear so edgy or scarce that people want it. And yet I havent found one free stream of this yet. So you would have no way of seeing it anyway if it was banned in the EU.
Try torrents
How do I buy this so I'm voting w/ my wallet?
Don't. All the platforms (Google, Apple, etc.) selling it hate us. It doesn't make sense to "protest" them by giving them money to produce yet more race-swapped propaganda. I "borrowed" it online. It's actually pretty bad.
Okay, now I'm definitely going to see it.