The website existing was too much temptation for her to resist so it's responsible for her abuse? And I love the bit in the middle of the article about consent being complicated, since when? It's been no means no for men for years, now for women consent is complicated!?
Women will re-interpret past interractions with other people, including sexual interractions, based on how she feels right now.
That goes up to retroactively withdrawing consent days / weeks / years later, or straight-up fabricate sexual encounters that never happened in her mind and believe it happened after imagining it enough times over several months.
They will ''vividly recall'' details that were never there, about something that didn't happen to them.
See also : the Ghomeshi trial. The judge basically ruled the following : ''ladies, I tried really hard to listen and believe and condemn the guy based on your claims, but every single detail that could be verrified contradicted your claims, you took ''liberties with the truth'' the whole time, so I reluctantly have to rule not-guilty''.
The website existing was too much temptation for her to resist so it's responsible for her abuse? And I love the bit in the middle of the article about consent being complicated, since when? It's been no means no for men for years, now for women consent is complicated!?
It’s trying to teach women that regret=rape
Women will re-interpret past interractions with other people, including sexual interractions, based on how she feels right now.
That goes up to retroactively withdrawing consent days / weeks / years later, or straight-up fabricate sexual encounters that never happened in her mind and believe it happened after imagining it enough times over several months.
They will ''vividly recall'' details that were never there, about something that didn't happen to them.
See also : the Ghomeshi trial. The judge basically ruled the following : ''ladies, I tried really hard to listen and believe and condemn the guy based on your claims, but every single detail that could be verrified contradicted your claims, you took ''liberties with the truth'' the whole time, so I reluctantly have to rule not-guilty''.