I've used the coding a lot. It works a lot better than most would think, but with a key element--when operated by someone who really already knows it. I've seen this first hand thru a little AI trialing project I did with one of the businesses I do work for. The output from myself and one other, both with a ton of real experience looked like actual developed software. The others couldn't get much that even worked. They have no idea what to ask.
Granted, that's not the type of thing that it can bitch about females or whatever. I should go feed it a git branch named "master" and see what it says.
I'm still not in favor of it, and I get pissed when the artists get all up in arms as if their stuff is untouchable and should never be done with AI, but they have zero care for all the software development jobs that have already been gutted by it. I do learn and tinker with it though, because the reality is I don't think it goes away and I still have to live and survive in the world and am not planning to move off grid into a cabin in the woods anytime soon.
This is the one thing I've noticed alot in regards to LLMs when I went down that particular rabbit hole.
If you're a really intelligent/smart/knowledgable person, LLMs work great and act as a very powerful intelligence multiplier.
If you're not any of that, you end up with shit results.
...the funny thing is, I don't think the aforementioned intelligent/smart/knowledgeable people realize this, and think that other people get similar results out of LLMs that they do. They've basically fallen into the typical-minded fallacy trap that's so prevalent nowadays.
I really didn't understand until I saw it. I wouldn't really go as far to call the people unintelligent that were working with it, just their skillset was nowhere near the computer anyway. So they were either asking AI to do their job really directly, and failing, or just had no clue. Before that I was pretty much of the mindset of wow, how much I can do with this.
I should go feed it a git branch named "master" and see what it says.
I refused the master -> main change out of principle, although main is actually more accurate, so 100% of my own repos use master - hasn't bitched about it
Yeah I probably use any of those words just to piss them off.
Inclusivenaming.org, as the official arbiters of woke word bullshit in coding is nice enough to provide a handy list of terms to be sure to use in all your projects.
Yes, they don’t even want you to use “abort” because it’s too close to abortion….
I really need to rebuild a compiler to use “nigger” as the error flag or something. if nigger then abort.
I've used the coding a lot. It works a lot better than most would think, but with a key element--when operated by someone who really already knows it. I've seen this first hand thru a little AI trialing project I did with one of the businesses I do work for. The output from myself and one other, both with a ton of real experience looked like actual developed software. The others couldn't get much that even worked. They have no idea what to ask.
Granted, that's not the type of thing that it can bitch about females or whatever. I should go feed it a git branch named "master" and see what it says.
I'm still not in favor of it, and I get pissed when the artists get all up in arms as if their stuff is untouchable and should never be done with AI, but they have zero care for all the software development jobs that have already been gutted by it. I do learn and tinker with it though, because the reality is I don't think it goes away and I still have to live and survive in the world and am not planning to move off grid into a cabin in the woods anytime soon.
This is the one thing I've noticed alot in regards to LLMs when I went down that particular rabbit hole.
If you're a really intelligent/smart/knowledgable person, LLMs work great and act as a very powerful intelligence multiplier.
If you're not any of that, you end up with shit results.
...the funny thing is, I don't think the aforementioned intelligent/smart/knowledgeable people realize this, and think that other people get similar results out of LLMs that they do. They've basically fallen into the typical-minded fallacy trap that's so prevalent nowadays.
I really didn't understand until I saw it. I wouldn't really go as far to call the people unintelligent that were working with it, just their skillset was nowhere near the computer anyway. So they were either asking AI to do their job really directly, and failing, or just had no clue. Before that I was pretty much of the mindset of wow, how much I can do with this.
I refused the master -> main change out of principle, although main is actually more accurate, so 100% of my own repos use master - hasn't bitched about it
Yeah I probably use any of those words just to piss them off.
Inclusivenaming.org, as the official arbiters of woke word bullshit in coding is nice enough to provide a handy list of terms to be sure to use in all your projects.
Yes, they don’t even want you to use “abort” because it’s too close to abortion….
I really need to rebuild a compiler to use “nigger” as the error flag or something. if nigger then abort.