The study says the same thing as the article, not what you're saying
The study literally says...
Participants were women (N=123), ages 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a history of same-sex sexual contact. Approximately 27% of women identified as exclusively heterosexual
That's literally what I said.
1 in 4 women who identify as straight said they still slept with other women in college, according to Marie Clarie.
The only person not taking the time to read and responding like an AI bot is the person collectively ignoring all the data to troll with anecdotes.
Most women may sleep around a lot, but few of them are attracted to other women so they only sleep around with men.
It doesn't matter what you think, or what they say they're attracted to. They will sleep around with whomever, whenever, if they feel like it. You literally have zero data for your position, just your feelings.
The point is that bisexual women are rare, contrary to propaganda about all or most women being bisexual.
No one said all or most women are bisexual. This is a strawman you keep bringing up because you cannot grasp how data works. Here's another stat that also aligns with all the other bits I posted:
But it also doesn't mean these women are actually attracted much to women, it just means that they're whores who will experiment and sleep around. Heck, 8 - 11% of women aged 18 - 35 have OnlyFans, according to Aaron Clarey (and other recent data), and a lot of those whores will mess around with other slags, even IF they're dating men or marry a man (like those whores Lillian Phillips or Nala Rey).
That's mostly what the data is saying: women are whores, regardless of who they're attracted to.
It's why bisexuals do not have long-lasting same-sex relationships, and most end up with men (i.e., they're whores).
In fact, you would NEVER know a woman is bisexual unless she told you, I don't get the impresison you talk much to the lasses, though, since you have a hard time following basic logical threads (no offence, mate, but the fact I have to keep repeating myself and breaking down irrefutable data while you rely on anecdotes and your feelings says a lot).
I also am compelled to ask, how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?
I suppose you're either statistically challenged, forgot what you said or you know you misrepresented the statistics and are trying to pretend you didn't. A quarter of women who self-reported a history of same-sex sexual contact is very different from a quarter of heterosexual women.
This new link you posted doesn't have any discernible connection to your argument. It's results from a survey about all kinds of things, one of which is that 5% of people identify as bisexual - 15% for Gen Z adults. Nothing about bisexuality among women.
Approximately 1.3% of U.S. adults identify as bisexual, according to the 2021 General Social Survey (GSS)
60.4% of bisexual identified individuals in the U.S. are women, 35.8% are men, and 3.8% are non-binary, from 2019 Pew Research
Even if you assume all the "non-binaries" are women, that means women identifying as bisexual are 0.83% of the US adult population and thus about 1.7% of the US women. A tiny number.
If we look at sexual activity instead you'll get higher numbers that include lesbians. For example the same GSS found
the percentage of women who have had sex with at least one woman increased from 3.6% [1973] to 8.7% [2014].
Unlike you, I have not linked to any random opinion pieces on medium; I'm not talking about anecdotes, and I'm NOT saying "EVERY" woman, like you keep alluding to.
Your arguments don't make any sense to what we're discussing.
If you don't like the data because it disrupts your world view, then that's a you problem, not a data problem. And you attempting to argue that you cannot trust any statistics because they can be manipulated may as well apply to everything; you can't trust that niggers rob and rape and steal more because the numbers are manipulated, right?
Anyway, I outlined that frequency and prevalence of blokes hooking up with bisexual whores happens in areas where faggotry is prevalent, such as Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, or London. Here is a statistical map so you can understand:
Let me make this very clear to you: No one is saying majority of straight women are bisexual. No one ever said that. No one typed that. You won't find it anywhere in this comment thread. Why you even came to that conclusion shows a clear disconnect with you not comprehending what the original poster typed and what I responded with.
Do you understand?
EDIT: Also, to address your misapplication of statistics here...
Even if you assume all the "non-binaries" are women, that means women identifying as bisexual are 0.83% of the US adult population and thus about 1.7% of the US women. A tiny number.
You're comparing that 1.7% against all women in the U.S., when that number is only applicable to women between the ages of 18 - 45, those are the ones regularly sleeping around and sexually active. That's why I quoted Aaron Clarey's stats about the 8 - 11% stat of women aged 18 - 35 being on OnlyFans. It's about the demographic percentages, not the flat generalities, and 11% is highly significant for women of marrying age.
Hence, why I linked to the demographic survey from PRRI showing 28% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ faggots, because it's a significant percentage of a narrow demographic of individuals, and that's the demographic that matters in relation to the discussion about prominently sexually active adults.
Anyway, all I posted was statistics about the sexual behaviours of bisexual women; how it coincides with what the other poster said: Yes, the disease CAN jump if some straight bloke bangs a bisexual chick who banged a bisexual bloke who banged a poofing faggot.
The numbers show that bisexual women are irrefutably, categorically, the highest STD/STI carriers per capita, next to gay and bisexual men.
It means, that u/Michalusmichalus/ point still stands: the disease can jump, if any straight lad sleeps with a bisexual woman in a highly concentrated area where bisexual women are likely to congregate and sleep around.
I don't know how much more simply I can make it.
No one is talking about some fair-skinned lass in the outback of Perth; no one is talking about some blonde-haired maiden living in the mountains of a small town in Montana; no one is talking about the sharp tongue wench in southern Wales. We're talking about the blokes who sleep with slags in areas where bisexual women are most prevalent.
Do you understand now? Are the words clear? No one is talking about majorities everywhere.
That was never a topic, it was never mentioned in any comment.
The study literally says...
Participants were women (N=123), ages 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a history of same-sex sexual contact. Approximately 27% of women identified as exclusively heterosexual
That's literally what I said.
1 in 4 women who identify as straight said they still slept with other women in college, according to Marie Clarie.
The only person not taking the time to read and responding like an AI bot is the person collectively ignoring all the data to troll with anecdotes.
It doesn't matter what you think, or what they say they're attracted to. They will sleep around with whomever, whenever, if they feel like it. You literally have zero data for your position, just your feelings.
No one said all or most women are bisexual. This is a strawman you keep bringing up because you cannot grasp how data works. Here's another stat that also aligns with all the other bits I posted:
https://prri.org/research/generation-zs-views-on-generational-change-and-the-challenges-and-opportunities-ahead-a-political-and-cultural-glimpse-into-americas-future/
It doesn't align with anything you're saying.
But it also doesn't mean these women are actually attracted much to women, it just means that they're whores who will experiment and sleep around. Heck, 8 - 11% of women aged 18 - 35 have OnlyFans, according to Aaron Clarey (and other recent data), and a lot of those whores will mess around with other slags, even IF they're dating men or marry a man (like those whores Lillian Phillips or Nala Rey).
That's mostly what the data is saying: women are whores, regardless of who they're attracted to.
It's why bisexuals do not have long-lasting same-sex relationships, and most end up with men (i.e., they're whores).
In fact, you would NEVER know a woman is bisexual unless she told you, I don't get the impresison you talk much to the lasses, though, since you have a hard time following basic logical threads (no offence, mate, but the fact I have to keep repeating myself and breaking down irrefutable data while you rely on anecdotes and your feelings says a lot).
I also am compelled to ask, how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?
I suppose you're either statistically challenged, forgot what you said or you know you misrepresented the statistics and are trying to pretend you didn't. A quarter of women who self-reported a history of same-sex sexual contact is very different from a quarter of heterosexual women.
This new link you posted doesn't have any discernible connection to your argument. It's results from a survey about all kinds of things, one of which is that 5% of people identify as bisexual - 15% for Gen Z adults. Nothing about bisexuality among women.
That is the propaganda though.
Exhibit A: https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/106qdcy/all_women_are_bi/
Exhibit B: https://medium.com/heart-affairs/are-women-naturally-bisexual-exploring-female-sexuality-e96aeb941b61
Statistics are usually manipulated, but if you like trusting the experts here's some statistics that show bisexuals are rare: https://worldmetrics.org/bisexuality-statistics/
Even if you assume all the "non-binaries" are women, that means women identifying as bisexual are 0.83% of the US adult population and thus about 1.7% of the US women. A tiny number.
If we look at sexual activity instead you'll get higher numbers that include lesbians. For example the same GSS found
https://www.socialworktoday.com/news/dn_060116.shtml
But the NSFG from 2011-2013 found
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-women-report-same-sex-relationships/
But "intimate same sex contact" could include kissing and molestation, not just a consensual act of "lesbian sex".
Oi, I get it now. You're not mentally all there.
I'm going to try to simplify this so you can understand.
You responded to this comment...
With this...
"Straight people don't tend to have sexual relations with bisexuals. It can happen but it's pretty rare."
I explained to you that straight men, do in fact sleep with bisexual women. Here is a study explaining the prevalence of that preference in the U.K:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918303842
Unlike you, I have not linked to any random opinion pieces on medium; I'm not talking about anecdotes, and I'm NOT saying "EVERY" woman, like you keep alluding to.
Your arguments don't make any sense to what we're discussing.
If you don't like the data because it disrupts your world view, then that's a you problem, not a data problem. And you attempting to argue that you cannot trust any statistics because they can be manipulated may as well apply to everything; you can't trust that niggers rob and rape and steal more because the numbers are manipulated, right?
Anyway, I outlined that frequency and prevalence of blokes hooking up with bisexual whores happens in areas where faggotry is prevalent, such as Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, or London. Here is a statistical map so you can understand:
Let me make this very clear to you: No one is saying majority of straight women are bisexual. No one ever said that. No one typed that. You won't find it anywhere in this comment thread. Why you even came to that conclusion shows a clear disconnect with you not comprehending what the original poster typed and what I responded with.
Do you understand?
EDIT: Also, to address your misapplication of statistics here...
You're comparing that 1.7% against all women in the U.S., when that number is only applicable to women between the ages of 18 - 45, those are the ones regularly sleeping around and sexually active. That's why I quoted Aaron Clarey's stats about the 8 - 11% stat of women aged 18 - 35 being on OnlyFans. It's about the demographic percentages, not the flat generalities, and 11% is highly significant for women of marrying age.
Hence, why I linked to the demographic survey from PRRI showing 28% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ faggots, because it's a significant percentage of a narrow demographic of individuals, and that's the demographic that matters in relation to the discussion about prominently sexually active adults.
Anyway, all I posted was statistics about the sexual behaviours of bisexual women; how it coincides with what the other poster said: Yes, the disease CAN jump if some straight bloke bangs a bisexual chick who banged a bisexual bloke who banged a poofing faggot.
The numbers show that bisexual women are irrefutably, categorically, the highest STD/STI carriers per capita, next to gay and bisexual men.
It means, that u/Michalusmichalus/ point still stands: the disease can jump, if any straight lad sleeps with a bisexual woman in a highly concentrated area where bisexual women are likely to congregate and sleep around.
I don't know how much more simply I can make it.
No one is talking about some fair-skinned lass in the outback of Perth; no one is talking about some blonde-haired maiden living in the mountains of a small town in Montana; no one is talking about the sharp tongue wench in southern Wales. We're talking about the blokes who sleep with slags in areas where bisexual women are most prevalent.
Do you understand now? Are the words clear? No one is talking about majorities everywhere.
That was never a topic, it was never mentioned in any comment.