The past few generations lied to us. First, you can tell a book by it's cover. Second, some people are better than others. And some people are much, much worse.
The original description for it is that the book was beautifully bound, so you shouldn't judge something that looks better than it actually is. A reversal of how people use it now.
Won't lie: bought more than one book specifically because of the cover. And the relationship between cover art and content quality is really damned strong.
This is why I no longer use the term "greatest generation". The WWII generation fucked us so hard that they should be demonized even more than the Boomers they spawned.
The past few generations lied to us. First, you can tell a book by it's cover. Second, some people are better than others. And some people are much, much worse.
Went to check the origins of the phrase. Coined by a whore, popularized by a jew. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_judge_a_book_by_its_cover
The original description for it is that the book was beautifully bound, so you shouldn't judge something that looks better than it actually is. A reversal of how people use it now.
Those ideas were all created and pushed by jews
Plus the melting pot.
Physiognomy never stopped never stopping.
I like pointing out to people that a book's cover is specifically designed to be judged.
Won't lie: bought more than one book specifically because of the cover. And the relationship between cover art and content quality is really damned strong.
This is why I no longer use the term "greatest generation". The WWII generation fucked us so hard that they should be demonized even more than the Boomers they spawned.