See, that was actually your argument. Why would food prices "triple" if browns were expelled? Because Americans would go dashing out to the countryside to pick food.
If Americans are never going to do manual labor, why is food price "tripling", lib?
I don't think American citizens would go dashing out to the countryside to pick food. I don't think your average Project Management Specialist is going to be like "Hey, honey, pull the kids out of school! We're moving to Texas so I can work a graveyard slaughterhouse shift!"
I find two kinds of Americans on forums like these: ones who are like "American citizens will totally do that work! Not me personally, I have more skills than that, but some of them!"; and ones who are like "I'd totally do that work!" even though they haven't worked a single day in ten years.
Now, sure, if it were literally a matter of life and death, and the government "strongly encouraged" people out of the cities and onto farms, maybe it could happen. But this isn't some kind of utopian scenario. This is the government flat-out making two million citizens' lives worse than they were.
Not a "lib." A lib doesn't believe in respecting market forces. I do.
And the answer is pretty simple: supply and demand. That's what sets market price. If you fire 70% of the workforce producing the food, the supply will plummet. If that happens, food prices will skyrocket.
"Triple"? Just a guess, really. It could be much, much worse than that. It could be as bad as having a year or two where food was borderline unavailable at any price. Followed by the scenario I gave you - the forced expulsion of city-dwellers into the agricultural sector.
You think industrial farming will let food rot on the ground instead of increase wages. If food is "unavailable", regardless of price, that means number-go-down for Sysco, Monsanto, et al. You think these megacorps will just shrug and die instead of hire a White at twice the wage of a brown.
I agree, actually. Glad we're on the same page about corporate-sponsored White genocide.
See, that was actually your argument. Why would food prices "triple" if browns were expelled? Because Americans would go dashing out to the countryside to pick food.
If Americans are never going to do manual labor, why is food price "tripling", lib?
I don't think American citizens would go dashing out to the countryside to pick food. I don't think your average Project Management Specialist is going to be like "Hey, honey, pull the kids out of school! We're moving to Texas so I can work a graveyard slaughterhouse shift!"
I find two kinds of Americans on forums like these: ones who are like "American citizens will totally do that work! Not me personally, I have more skills than that, but some of them!"; and ones who are like "I'd totally do that work!" even though they haven't worked a single day in ten years.
Now, sure, if it were literally a matter of life and death, and the government "strongly encouraged" people out of the cities and onto farms, maybe it could happen. But this isn't some kind of utopian scenario. This is the government flat-out making two million citizens' lives worse than they were.
Answer the question, lib. Why is food price "tripling" if browns are expelled?
Not a "lib." A lib doesn't believe in respecting market forces. I do.
And the answer is pretty simple: supply and demand. That's what sets market price. If you fire 70% of the workforce producing the food, the supply will plummet. If that happens, food prices will skyrocket.
"Triple"? Just a guess, really. It could be much, much worse than that. It could be as bad as having a year or two where food was borderline unavailable at any price. Followed by the scenario I gave you - the forced expulsion of city-dwellers into the agricultural sector.
You think industrial farming will let food rot on the ground instead of increase wages. If food is "unavailable", regardless of price, that means number-go-down for Sysco, Monsanto, et al. You think these megacorps will just shrug and die instead of hire a White at twice the wage of a brown.
I agree, actually. Glad we're on the same page about corporate-sponsored White genocide.