Because the world moves at the speed of current events and what gets talked about.
Ivermectin was used for years prior to covid and many simply forgot it existed beforehand once it was labelled double plus ungood. So things being new or old isn't always important now.
Ivermectin was the frontline treatment for SARS and MERS, both of which were a corona virus.
None of the "Warpspeed" treatments would have been approved if there was an existing treatment protocol, with a drug regimen. Experimental drugs are only approved for use on the public while there is no existing treatment.
When Trump brought Ivermectin to world attention by mentioning it, it became imperative that it be discredited so Pfizer could make obscene amounts of money by rolling out under tested gene therapy.
And the media complied like a well trained Labrador.
Idk why Google’s compression keeps being cited when it’s over a year old.
Because the world moves at the speed of current events and what gets talked about.
Ivermectin was used for years prior to covid and many simply forgot it existed beforehand once it was labelled double plus ungood. So things being new or old isn't always important now.
Ivermectin was the frontline treatment for SARS and MERS, both of which were a corona virus.
None of the "Warpspeed" treatments would have been approved if there was an existing treatment protocol, with a drug regimen. Experimental drugs are only approved for use on the public while there is no existing treatment.
When Trump brought Ivermectin to world attention by mentioning it, it became imperative that it be discredited so Pfizer could make obscene amounts of money by rolling out under tested gene therapy.
And the media complied like a well trained Labrador.
Hey, leave the labs out of this! 🐕
Because the implementation of the paper just came out at the end of March.