"In the worst-case scenario, our medical system unravels as various licensed healthcare professionals — talk therapists, psychiatrists, and presumably anyone else who claims to utilize speech when administering treatments to patients — start broadly wielding their new-found constitutional right to provide substandard medical care."
So for her it comes down to assuming anything that goes against the federal narrative that transitioning is double-plus good for kids is “substandard medical care.” Which is a great illustration for WHY the government shouldn’t be mandating treatment. I’m certain that Jackson can’t see past “LGBTQ+ is good” to recognize the potential threat of a government which, say, mandates therapists discourage people from marrying outside their race and polluting the bloodlines.
Although someone in the comments of that article did point out that a case could be made for arguing the bill of rights shouldn’t apply to states, because it used to not be. While that ship has long since sailed, at least it would have been a novel approach. Jackson is just so damned predictable.
"In the worst-case scenario, our medical system unravels as various licensed healthcare professionals — talk therapists, psychiatrists, and presumably anyone else who claims to utilize speech when administering treatments to patients — start broadly wielding their new-found constitutional right to provide substandard medical care." So for her it comes down to assuming anything that goes against the federal narrative that transitioning is double-plus good for kids is “substandard medical care.” Which is a great illustration for WHY the government shouldn’t be mandating treatment. I’m certain that Jackson can’t see past “LGBTQ+ is good” to recognize the potential threat of a government which, say, mandates therapists discourage people from marrying outside their race and polluting the bloodlines. Although someone in the comments of that article did point out that a case could be made for arguing the bill of rights shouldn’t apply to states, because it used to not be. While that ship has long since sailed, at least it would have been a novel approach. Jackson is just so damned predictable.
That is definitely ChatGPT if you ask me. A human did not write that ridiculous collection of run on sentences, and certainly no lawyer did it either.
Between this and her ranting about ostriches during the Dobbs decision, it's clear to me that she's an illiterate.
The Constitution doesn't have anything to to do with medical care. A 9th grader could have told her this.
Incidentally, another reason why the idea of healthcare as a human right is a catastrophic idea