Yea, it says: "French is a retarded useless romance language that no one does business in. Fuck, just try to say 78 in French, get fucked with that shit."
No, it means a lack of respect for French speakers who want to keep their culture and language. Only someone who speaks only one language (and that poorly) would say that knowing other languages is useless. Then you wouldn't mistake 78 for 98.
Business? Mon ami, life is more than the almighty green. Or are you one of the people who supports open borders because "it's good for the economy"? French should be able to remain French, not become Americans, because being fat, addicted to fentanyl and having a peanut allergy is no way to go through life.
So, don't fly Air Canda,
I don't. It has no flights in Europe.
because they don't give a shit about running safe flights,
So they're like other airlines?
they wank around over what language their CEO speaks.
Like I said, it seems unimportant to you, but when your language is dying out, it is extremely important.
It's not limited to right-wing. There's a reason the province has been trying to separate for a long time. This is a very deep seated conflict at the heart of Canada.
Anti-forced bilingualism is a thing for right-wing or any sane person. Only 18% of the population is bilingual, only 10% of the physical country has people speaking both regularly. 85% of the country speaks English, so if Air Canada's CEO can speak to 85% of the country I'd say that's good enough.
To disqualify >80% of candidates for something that can easily be handled by translators is absurd and only a retard would defend it. You're here defending it...
Anti-forced bilingualism is a thing for right-wing or any sane person
I'm less sympathetic given the fact that many Europeans are forced to learn English when it's not even their native language. So depriving others of their native language in service of globalization and homogenization seems much less justified.
Only 18% of the population is bilingual, only 10% of the physical country has people speaking both regularly. 85% of the country speaks English, so if Air Canada's CEO can speak to 85% of the country I'd say that's good enough.
So this means that 15% speaks only French, 18% French and English, and 67% English only?
I assume the 67% are more likely to be lower class. That is a real concern, that this would result in more elitism. On the other hand, people being protected in their native land has a higher priority to me.
To disqualify >80% of candidates for something that can easily be handled by translators is absurd and only a retard would defend it. You're here defending it...
I've never seen you be so spicy.
I sort of understand. But can you also not understand that in a country where so few people are French speakers, French can easily be swamped and assimilated into the mainstream, and people losing their language, culture and identity? It is already happening.
You're losing the plot. We're talking about a CEO here. It's literally only about the green.
French should be able to remain French
It already does. Whether the CEO of an airline speaks it or not is completely and totally immaterial. If you make it a factor then, get used to speaking English, because you are doing more damage to your own language than anyone else.
No, it means a lack of respect for French speakers who want to keep their culture and language. Only someone who speaks only one language (and that poorly) would say that knowing other languages is useless. Then you wouldn't mistake 78 for 98.
Business? Mon ami, life is more than the almighty green. Or are you one of the people who supports open borders because "it's good for the economy"? French should be able to remain French, not become Americans, because being fat, addicted to fentanyl and having a peanut allergy is no way to go through life.
I don't. It has no flights in Europe.
So they're like other airlines?
Like I said, it seems unimportant to you, but when your language is dying out, it is extremely important.
It's called Air CANADA not Air Quebec. Less than a quarter of Canadians speak French.
Who cares if a CEO doesn't speak this minority language? They provide service in both, so stop bitching.
It's Air Canada indeed, and French is an official language of Canada.
Is anti-French a thing in Canadian right-wing politics?
It's not limited to right-wing. There's a reason the province has been trying to separate for a long time. This is a very deep seated conflict at the heart of Canada.
It's also a reason Alberta is trying to separate.
Anti-forced bilingualism is a thing for right-wing or any sane person. Only 18% of the population is bilingual, only 10% of the physical country has people speaking both regularly. 85% of the country speaks English, so if Air Canada's CEO can speak to 85% of the country I'd say that's good enough.
To disqualify >80% of candidates for something that can easily be handled by translators is absurd and only a retard would defend it. You're here defending it...
I'm less sympathetic given the fact that many Europeans are forced to learn English when it's not even their native language. So depriving others of their native language in service of globalization and homogenization seems much less justified.
So this means that 15% speaks only French, 18% French and English, and 67% English only?
I assume the 67% are more likely to be lower class. That is a real concern, that this would result in more elitism. On the other hand, people being protected in their native land has a higher priority to me.
I've never seen you be so spicy.
I sort of understand. But can you also not understand that in a country where so few people are French speakers, French can easily be swamped and assimilated into the mainstream, and people losing their language, culture and identity? It is already happening.
You're losing the plot. We're talking about a CEO here. It's literally only about the green.
It already does. Whether the CEO of an airline speaks it or not is completely and totally immaterial. If you make it a factor then, get used to speaking English, because you are doing more damage to your own language than anyone else.
Not at all. So you're fine with a Disney CEO pushing wokeness if the GREEN goes well? Come on.
This is salami-slicing, and it ends up with people being strangers in their own country.
How though?