You're arguing with someone who thinks the gay, Jew-worshipping televangelists of the 1970s were the first people who got Christianity right. There's not much point in arguing with someone who thinks the Bible commands him to suck jew cock. It's like arguing with a tweaked hobo on the NYC subway that the voices in his head aren't real.
The covenant literal restoration and repentance of the Jewish people as a nation began officially in 1689 as a codified belief as in officially named which you'll notice is about 100 years after the reformation meaning a generation got their hands on the Bible and could start interpreting it and seeing what it said rather than trusting the Catholic church's "just trust me" interpretations with only those who knew Latin reading it.
The foundations for believing in the Covenant return for Israel are Biblical based which is why both the church 100 or so removed from the twisted traditions of Catholicism, believed it, Paul believed it as inspired by divine revelation, and Charles Spurgeon believed it as did the Bible first evangelicals as they're called (as though evangalizing the good news is a bad thing) of the 20th century also believed it.
It's today in our increasingly pagan nation where people are rejecting the Bible as the literal capital T truth to look to in order to discern truth that people are going back to other ways to discern truth which ultimately leads to adopting aspects of the world systems belief, which includes wanting to eliminate Jews and Israel something foreign to the Bible.
Not foreign in certain branches of Christianity, but certainly foreign to the Bible.
You're arguing with someone who thinks the gay, Jew-worshipping televangelists of the 1970s were the first people who got Christianity right. There's not much point in arguing with someone who thinks the Bible commands him to suck jew cock. It's like arguing with a tweaked hobo on the NYC subway that the voices in his head aren't real.
The covenant literal restoration and repentance of the Jewish people as a nation began officially in 1689 as a codified belief as in officially named which you'll notice is about 100 years after the reformation meaning a generation got their hands on the Bible and could start interpreting it and seeing what it said rather than trusting the Catholic church's "just trust me" interpretations with only those who knew Latin reading it.
The foundations for believing in the Covenant return for Israel are Biblical based which is why both the church 100 or so removed from the twisted traditions of Catholicism, believed it, Paul believed it as inspired by divine revelation, and Charles Spurgeon believed it as did the Bible first evangelicals as they're called (as though evangalizing the good news is a bad thing) of the 20th century also believed it.
It's today in our increasingly pagan nation where people are rejecting the Bible as the literal capital T truth to look to in order to discern truth that people are going back to other ways to discern truth which ultimately leads to adopting aspects of the world systems belief, which includes wanting to eliminate Jews and Israel something foreign to the Bible.
Not foreign in certain branches of Christianity, but certainly foreign to the Bible.
No, I won't give you $3.50 to help pay for your "bus pass." Now, shoo.
You think God commanded you to suck Jewish cock. LOL
Charles Spurgeon believed in the dispensationalist view of Israel and the Jews in the 1800s before Israel even became a nation again.
He believed Israel would become a literal nation which would precede Christ's return.
Don't take my word for it. Ask AI what Charles Spurgeons beliefs were, whether he prescribed to replacement theology or dispensationalism?
Pretty sure he was before the 1970s.