Well, America has been locked out of Iran for a few decades now, and China has been running around the world buying everything in sight using their paper-money. So DUH they have more % of it.
There's ample reasons to regime change Iran, goading China's just the cherry on top!
Oh Antonio. You just can't help yourself, can you.
There WERE WMDs there. They HAD an active chemical and nuclear weapons program. We know this because the USA and UK SOLD it to them! France too? I forget.
The Iraq War? The first was a success until the UN took a total win and traded it for a "draw". The second was a huge success, one for the history books. Until Obama took a war that was 99% won... and lost!
We know this because the USA and UK SOLD it to them! France too?
Germany too. All destroyed in 1991. It must also be noted that you called Europe "heartless scumbags" for trading with Saddam, while supporting the US giving them chemical weapons to use on Iranian civilians.
You're the Bootlicker of Bootlickers, a Canadian Ukrainian who worships neocons, and says things too crazy even for Nancyboy Lindsey.
The second was a huge success, one for the history books.
I mis-read the comment, my mistake. It's just you being you.
"All destroyed in 1991" except for the whole program they moved to Syria, which Assad then used chemical weapons on his own people. Aside from that there's also the renewed attempt to buy Yellowcake, which they still had 550 TONS of (one needs about 1K toms per atomic weapon? iirc). Aside from the facts they didn't have "active chemical and nuclear weapons inside Iraq" at the time of conquest. Technically true š and that's the best kind, eh?
Well, America has been locked out of Iran for a few decades now, and China has been running around the world buying everything in sight using their paper-money. So DUH they have more % of it.
There's ample reasons to regime change Iran, goading China's just the cherry on top!
Stellar endorsement from a guy who supported the Iraq War and to this day claims that there were WMDs in Iraq.
I assume you also think it was a smashing success?
Oh Antonio. You just can't help yourself, can you.
There WERE WMDs there. They HAD an active chemical and nuclear weapons program. We know this because the USA and UK SOLD it to them! France too? I forget.
The Iraq War? The first was a success until the UN took a total win and traded it for a "draw". The second was a huge success, one for the history books. Until Obama took a war that was 99% won... and lost!
Post nose
?Que?
Sockpuppet? Better order yourself new glasses.
LOL.
Germany too. All destroyed in 1991. It must also be noted that you called Europe "heartless scumbags" for trading with Saddam, while supporting the US giving them chemical weapons to use on Iranian civilians.
You're the Bootlicker of Bootlickers, a Canadian Ukrainian who worships neocons, and says things too crazy even for Nancyboy Lindsey.
There's no way you're real.
Iād rather listen to a liberal woman at this point. Thanks.
Fuck off you cunt. We've been Canadians since Grandpa was born in 1906. So get fucked. Keep your OCD delusions to yourself, faggot.
I mis-read the comment, my mistake. It's just you being you.
"All destroyed in 1991" except for the whole program they moved to Syria, which Assad then used chemical weapons on his own people. Aside from that there's also the renewed attempt to buy Yellowcake, which they still had 550 TONS of (one needs about 1K toms per atomic weapon? iirc). Aside from the facts they didn't have "active chemical and nuclear weapons inside Iraq" at the time of conquest. Technically true š and that's the best kind, eh?