I mis-read the comment, my mistake. It's just you being you.
"All destroyed in 1991" except for the whole program they moved to Syria, which Assad then used chemical weapons on his own people. Aside from that there's also the renewed attempt to buy Yellowcake, which they still had 550 TONS of (one needs about 1K toms per atomic weapon? iirc). Aside from the facts they didn't have "active chemical and nuclear weapons inside Iraq" at the time of conquest. Technically true 😜 and that's the best kind, eh?
I mean, even assuming this were true, don't you have any idea how retarded you sound? Invading a country for WMDs that have been moved to another country?
Do YOU have any idea how ignorant and brainwashed YOU sound?
The WMDS were "the sizzle" not "the steak" ok?
Need I explain this for your sub 80 iq?
You sell the steak, but you advertise the sizzle. WMDs was a sales pitch. They knew the program had been moved, but it still existed & sounds scary. It was very real, no matter how much the MSM (which you swallow whole) lies about it.
To pretend this was the ONLY reason Bush II invaded is stupid. Just stupid.
You sell the steak, but you advertise the sizzle. WMDs was a sales pitch. They knew the program had been moved, but it still existed & sounds scary. It was very real, no matter how much the MSM (which you swallow whole) lies about it.
So let me get this straight. They knew that the "program existed but had been moved", but they told people that Iraq has WMDs and is willing to use them, and that there will be a mushroom cloud in 30 minutes?
What that war, and the present one proved, is that they should never have given up their WD.
I mis-read the comment, my mistake. It's just you being you.
"All destroyed in 1991" except for the whole program they moved to Syria, which Assad then used chemical weapons on his own people. Aside from that there's also the renewed attempt to buy Yellowcake, which they still had 550 TONS of (one needs about 1K toms per atomic weapon? iirc). Aside from the facts they didn't have "active chemical and nuclear weapons inside Iraq" at the time of conquest. Technically true 😜 and that's the best kind, eh?
I mean, even assuming this were true, don't you have any idea how retarded you sound? Invading a country for WMDs that have been moved to another country?
Do YOU have any idea how ignorant and brainwashed YOU sound?
The WMDS were "the sizzle" not "the steak" ok?
Need I explain this for your sub 80 iq?
You sell the steak, but you advertise the sizzle. WMDs was a sales pitch. They knew the program had been moved, but it still existed & sounds scary. It was very real, no matter how much the MSM (which you swallow whole) lies about it.
To pretend this was the ONLY reason Bush II invaded is stupid. Just stupid.
True, there were a lot of other stupid reasons.
Stick to making analogies with borscht.
So let me get this straight. They knew that the "program existed but had been moved", but they told people that Iraq has WMDs and is willing to use them, and that there will be a mushroom cloud in 30 minutes?
What that war, and the present one proved, is that they should never have given up their WD.