You really can't tell? Like when he says he's a master, and she counters that she's a grandmaster? Or right off the bat when she peeks under the table to see what he's up to? Or starting her interaction with him with "how old are you?" Or when she says she's "still higher than you?"
Brother, for whatever reason you're glazing this chick. He's not. He's doing better than you.
No one is "glazing" anyone. I'm just not some over emotional little boy looking to be offended by human behavior. She looks at his pillow, oh my days, she looked at his pillow. Clearly this bitch needs to be corrected. She asked a child how old he is? Are you serious, the nerve to ask a kid who's playing adults in a tournament his age. He offers his rank unsolicited she responds in kind. And she's in the wrong?
But, it's not just me, several others besides me have pointed out to you what's sitting in front of your face. You're choosing to have a chimp-out over this rather than actually listen and synthesize what's being reported to you. When numerous other people tell you "I see this," your sheer insistence that you're not seeing it doesn't make you right and them wrong, it makes you increasingly more likely to be seeing things (or not seeing them) inaccurately.
She challenged him, he pushed back. That's what happened here. It's not about "wrong," she was swinging dick. I guess that's part of the sport, but you are refusing to see this in her, and assigning all aggression to him.
You're wrong about this. And that's the limit of my interest in this, take it or leave it.
Chimp-out, how? Not agreeing with you isn't a chimp-out. Oh concensus makes any answer the correct one. How did she challenge him? Oh that's right she asked his age, and because that would offend you, you assign her a motive and that's the objective truth.
You really can't tell? Like when he says he's a master, and she counters that she's a grandmaster? Or right off the bat when she peeks under the table to see what he's up to? Or starting her interaction with him with "how old are you?" Or when she says she's "still higher than you?"
Brother, for whatever reason you're glazing this chick. He's not. He's doing better than you.
No one is "glazing" anyone. I'm just not some over emotional little boy looking to be offended by human behavior. She looks at his pillow, oh my days, she looked at his pillow. Clearly this bitch needs to be corrected. She asked a child how old he is? Are you serious, the nerve to ask a kid who's playing adults in a tournament his age. He offers his rank unsolicited she responds in kind. And she's in the wrong?
But, it's not just me, several others besides me have pointed out to you what's sitting in front of your face. You're choosing to have a chimp-out over this rather than actually listen and synthesize what's being reported to you. When numerous other people tell you "I see this," your sheer insistence that you're not seeing it doesn't make you right and them wrong, it makes you increasingly more likely to be seeing things (or not seeing them) inaccurately.
She challenged him, he pushed back. That's what happened here. It's not about "wrong," she was swinging dick. I guess that's part of the sport, but you are refusing to see this in her, and assigning all aggression to him.
You're wrong about this. And that's the limit of my interest in this, take it or leave it.
Chimp-out, how? Not agreeing with you isn't a chimp-out. Oh concensus makes any answer the correct one. How did she challenge him? Oh that's right she asked his age, and because that would offend you, you assign her a motive and that's the objective truth.