1% responsible for approx 43% of sexual offenses
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Oh so like Canada
I know Canada was building a few concentration camps like that during the covid hysteria, but as far as I'm aware, they never actually put them into practice. The Freedom Convoy happened before they did, and it became politically-inconvenient to push the issue after the protest was illegally dispersed.
Australia did actually enforce covid gulags, though. They would send cops to people's houses and drag them away if they refused to comply to the governmental mandates.
They 100% did.
To visitors. Muh quarantine
Tbf it is a prison country so..
I dont get how you can be australian and just go like nothing ever happened. "Sure Mr Government here is half my paycheck, anything else I can do for you?"
Ok, fair enough, there was that 2-week quarantine for people arriving from abroad, but that's not quite the same thing, is it? Being sent to an asylum implies (to me, at least) a somewhat more permanent stay.
In Australia, I believe that they were sent there on a permanent basis, until either the pandemic "ended" (it still hasn't, covid is now part of the seasonal flu) or they "voluntarily" complied with getting injected with the experimental serum developed by the pharmaceutical company that holds the world record for making the most payments for medical malpractice ever, and which only distributed its products in countries that had signed contracts to not hold them responsible for any side effects incurred as a result of their "vaccine".
The nice thing about being a political dissident wrongly locked away in the Psych Ward in Canuckistan is that those spots are rationed too.
So they won't keep you incarcerated long because inevitably you get yeeted the next time a hopped-up psychotic non gets hauled into ER & needs your bed.
This is exactly how it goes. But it goes more than that. Healthcare is free, but if your treatment is too expensive (or you're too old), it will just get denied. They'll say "outcome after surgery isn't good blah blah blah" or "treatment not proved to work/not approved by Health Canada" and this will be it for you.
There's a lawsuit over automatic denials. It's UHC, of course. But, the lawsuit goea for fraud making the case that selling insurance with the intention of auto denying claims is fraud. I hope it wins.
Not in canada
they'll just start maiding the white ones