I assume when they say "mass surveillance of American citizens" what they mean is immigration enforcement. No one mainstream, whether politician or tech company, really cares about mass surveillance in general, the left only started pretending they do when it started targeting their pet browns and might be a minor speedbump in their mission to turn the United States into Somalia.
Opposition to mass surveillance is kind of like bodily autonomy- it's a nice-sounding concept, but 90% of the people who claim to care about it arrived at the position by working backwards from a conclusion they wanted to reach, and will abandon the principal the moment it supports a conclusion they don't like, as we saw during covid.
Opposition to mass surveillance is kind of like bodily autonomy- it's a nice-sounding concept, but 90% of the people who claim to care about it arrived at the position by working backwards from a conclusion they wanted to reach
Ah, well I didn't know that most people who oppose mass surveillance, do so for bad reasons.
I did. I now support mass surveillance because leftists oppose it to protect 'browns'. Anything else? Maybe leftists also have bad reasons to oppose the war in Iran, and maybe slavery? FUCK YEAH MURICA BOMB THE HELL OUT OF THEM AND TAKE THEIR WOMEN AS SLAVES!
You're fucking retarded to think my post supports mass surveillance. I literally say opposition to it, in the part you actually quoted, is a nice-sounding concept, because it is. The "but", if you read the words, doesn't say it's actually a bad concept, just that the left don't really support it. They're just using it as cover argument to get what they really want, which is less immigration enforcement. Just like with bodily autonomy, the left should be called out when they're hypocrites, except it seems you really hate that idea. So please go on mocking arguments that I never actually made.
I assume when they say "mass surveillance of American citizens" what they mean is immigration enforcement. No one mainstream, whether politician or tech company, really cares about mass surveillance in general, the left only started pretending they do when it started targeting their pet browns and might be a minor speedbump in their mission to turn the United States into Somalia.
Opposition to mass surveillance is kind of like bodily autonomy- it's a nice-sounding concept, but 90% of the people who claim to care about it arrived at the position by working backwards from a conclusion they wanted to reach, and will abandon the principal the moment it supports a conclusion they don't like, as we saw during covid.
Ah, well I didn't know that most people who oppose mass surveillance, do so for bad reasons.
Time to support it I guess.
Try reading the rest of the post, because you badly missed the point of it.
I did. I now support mass surveillance because leftists oppose it to protect 'browns'. Anything else? Maybe leftists also have bad reasons to oppose the war in Iran, and maybe slavery? FUCK YEAH MURICA BOMB THE HELL OUT OF THEM AND TAKE THEIR WOMEN AS SLAVES!
You're fucking retarded to think my post supports mass surveillance. I literally say opposition to it, in the part you actually quoted, is a nice-sounding concept, because it is. The "but", if you read the words, doesn't say it's actually a bad concept, just that the left don't really support it. They're just using it as cover argument to get what they really want, which is less immigration enforcement. Just like with bodily autonomy, the left should be called out when they're hypocrites, except it seems you really hate that idea. So please go on mocking arguments that I never actually made.