I did. I now support mass surveillance because leftists oppose it to protect 'browns'. Anything else? Maybe leftists also have bad reasons to oppose the war in Iran, and maybe slavery? FUCK YEAH MURICA BOMB THE HELL OUT OF THEM AND TAKE THEIR WOMEN AS SLAVES!
You're fucking retarded to think my post supports mass surveillance. I literally say opposition to it, in the part you actually quoted, is a nice-sounding concept, because it is. The "but", if you read the words, doesn't say it's actually a bad concept, just that the left don't really support it. They're just using it as cover argument to get what they really want, which is less immigration enforcement. Just like with bodily autonomy, the left should be called out when they're hypocrites, except it seems you really hate that idea. So please go on mocking arguments that I never actually made.
You're fucking retarded to think my post supports mass surveillance.
I'm glad that you don't.
The "but", if you read the words, doesn't say it's actually a bad concept, just that the left don't really support it.
You didn't say that it's a bad concept. Nor that it is a good concept. Only that it SOUNDS good. It sure did not sound to me like you oppose it. But I'll gladly take your word for it that you don't. Then we agree that opposition to mass surveillance is a good concept even if the left does not support it on principle.
They're just using it as cover argument to get what they really want, which is less immigration enforcement.
Maybe. And maybe they're smart enough to not support a strong centralized state when they (think they) don't control it.
Try reading the rest of the post, because you badly missed the point of it.
I did. I now support mass surveillance because leftists oppose it to protect 'browns'. Anything else? Maybe leftists also have bad reasons to oppose the war in Iran, and maybe slavery? FUCK YEAH MURICA BOMB THE HELL OUT OF THEM AND TAKE THEIR WOMEN AS SLAVES!
You're fucking retarded to think my post supports mass surveillance. I literally say opposition to it, in the part you actually quoted, is a nice-sounding concept, because it is. The "but", if you read the words, doesn't say it's actually a bad concept, just that the left don't really support it. They're just using it as cover argument to get what they really want, which is less immigration enforcement. Just like with bodily autonomy, the left should be called out when they're hypocrites, except it seems you really hate that idea. So please go on mocking arguments that I never actually made.
I'm glad that you don't.
You didn't say that it's a bad concept. Nor that it is a good concept. Only that it SOUNDS good. It sure did not sound to me like you oppose it. But I'll gladly take your word for it that you don't. Then we agree that opposition to mass surveillance is a good concept even if the left does not support it on principle.
Maybe. And maybe they're smart enough to not support a strong centralized state when they (think they) don't control it.