How do you filter out the bad ones before they do something bad?
you don't. nobody can see the future, and anyone who says otherwise is either naive or selling you something.
You catch Bad actors in the act, conspiring for the act, or after the fact. when Bad actors are caught, Justice must be swift, unyielding, and public so as to set an example.
this is where our modern justice fails, with a combination of too many bleeding hearts and too many conspirators infiltrating our justice system itself. condemning regular people won't do a thing because the conspirators stay in power. even worse, the conspirators use the condemnation of regular people to stoke sympathy and maintain power.
that is why it is crucial to be laser focused on evil actors, and only evil actors.
The very government agencies responsible for stopping these crimes and bringing them to justice have been hijacked by them [liars, murderers, rapists, and frauds]
good, so we are aligned and the target for justice is clear?
"Just get rid of the bad guys" is a low resolution take because it doesn't actually describe a mechanism for how to rid society of bad actors. It is akin to saying "just cure cancer" without describing how the treatment works, what the delivery method is, etc.
I'm glad you brought up cancer, because it is an excellent analogy. there's a treatment for cancer called chemotherapy where the cancerous cells are zapped with radiation. it does not destroy the whole organ that contains the cancer, only the cancer itself. the alternate is destroying the body, which defeats the purpose.
the conspirators use the condemnation of regular people to stoke sympathy and maintain power.
that is why it is crucial to be laser focused on evil actors, and only evil actors.
The jew's inherent in group preference means that they near universally support one another simply because they are jewish regardless of their actions. We have overwhelming evidence of this on just this board alone. I can count on one hand the number of jews I have seen openly criticizing the behavior of jews, and one of those has been dead for years. The only one I even see getting any kind of mainstream traction with that is Dave Smith, and the rest of the jews consider him to be a race traitor.
It is the same problem with blacks supporting each other even when they commit murder. OJ Simpson is a prime example of that. You cannot filter them out because they won't do it themselves. Their control of our government only serves to amplify the problem. We literally cannot target only the bad ones because the "good" ones run cover for them and bail them out. Sometimes they even fly them to Israel so that we never get the chance for justice.
The very government agencies responsible for stopping these crimes and bringing them to justice have been hijacked by them [liars, murderers, rapists, and frauds]
Adding a bunch of words to what I said is a sneaky jew trick that I'm not falling for. I explicitly referred to the jewish control of our government and you reframed it as a general population attribute. You are 100% a disingenuous kike.
I'm glad you brought up cancer, because it is an excellent analogy. there's a treatment for cancer called chemotherapy where the cancerous cells are zapped with radiation. it does not destroy the whole organ that contains the cancer, only the cancer itself.
Chemotherapy is chemical based not radiation based you moron. Chemotherapy doesn't just kill cancer cells, it kills other cells as well. That's why it doesn't have a 100% success rate. If enough cells get killed before the cancer cells die, then you can die as well. Not only that, but chemotherapy doesn't even work well for all types of cancer.
5 minutes of research into chemo would have told you that, and yet you still posted that with the confident ignorance of a 19 year old white woman.
Chemotherapy is chemical based not radiation based you moron.
my bad, I got terms mixed up. what I described was radiation therapy.
Adding a bunch of words to what I said is a sneaky jew trick
Who's being disingenuous? I quoted exactly what you said in direct response to those exact words. I didn't want to do the whole thing because it was clunky, but I will quote the full context below because you are falsely accusing me of being a liar:
Filter out liars, murderers, rapists, and frauds, and filter out anyone who covers for them.
The very government agencies responsible for stopping these crimes and bringing them to justice have been hijacked by them.
See that "them"? the one used directly after the list "Liars, murderers, rapists, and frauds", which implies that collection is encompassed by the catch-all word "them"? if you meant something else, you should have said so.
a sneaky jew trick
I was raised Christian, I am uncircumcised, and my disposition on Israel has ranged from indifference to contempt over the years. YHWH, Adonai, or whatever he's called in Judaism is a false god on par with Baal.
my thesis on Israel is that Israel is happy to sacrifice good people, including both Zionist and non-zionist jews, to play the propaganda game. they are setting up one of the greatest genocides of jews the world has ever seen (in addition to their current active genocides), and calling for the genocide of innocent Jews only helps Israel.
Who's being disingenuous? I quoted exactly what you said in direct response to those exact words. I didn't want to do the whole thing because it was clunky, but I will quote the full context below because you are falsely accusing me of being a liar:
You literally added words in brackets into the quote. You quite literally put words in my mouth. Everyone on this board can see it. Trying to play semantics doesn't work here.
You literally added words in brackets into the quote
I will refer you to my previous post and please read it more thoroughly.
that is unless you have no idea how square brackets are used in quotes. square brackets indicate that the text inside are not part of the original quote, and instead contain context surrounding the quote. it's very standard to use them in both journalism and in academic papers.
you don't. nobody can see the future, and anyone who says otherwise is either naive or selling you something.
You catch Bad actors in the act, conspiring for the act, or after the fact. when Bad actors are caught, Justice must be swift, unyielding, and public so as to set an example.
this is where our modern justice fails, with a combination of too many bleeding hearts and too many conspirators infiltrating our justice system itself. condemning regular people won't do a thing because the conspirators stay in power. even worse, the conspirators use the condemnation of regular people to stoke sympathy and maintain power.
that is why it is crucial to be laser focused on evil actors, and only evil actors.
good, so we are aligned and the target for justice is clear?
I'm glad you brought up cancer, because it is an excellent analogy. there's a treatment for cancer called chemotherapy where the cancerous cells are zapped with radiation. it does not destroy the whole organ that contains the cancer, only the cancer itself. the alternate is destroying the body, which defeats the purpose.
The jew's inherent in group preference means that they near universally support one another simply because they are jewish regardless of their actions. We have overwhelming evidence of this on just this board alone. I can count on one hand the number of jews I have seen openly criticizing the behavior of jews, and one of those has been dead for years. The only one I even see getting any kind of mainstream traction with that is Dave Smith, and the rest of the jews consider him to be a race traitor.
It is the same problem with blacks supporting each other even when they commit murder. OJ Simpson is a prime example of that. You cannot filter them out because they won't do it themselves. Their control of our government only serves to amplify the problem. We literally cannot target only the bad ones because the "good" ones run cover for them and bail them out. Sometimes they even fly them to Israel so that we never get the chance for justice.
Adding a bunch of words to what I said is a sneaky jew trick that I'm not falling for. I explicitly referred to the jewish control of our government and you reframed it as a general population attribute. You are 100% a disingenuous kike.
Chemotherapy is chemical based not radiation based you moron. Chemotherapy doesn't just kill cancer cells, it kills other cells as well. That's why it doesn't have a 100% success rate. If enough cells get killed before the cancer cells die, then you can die as well. Not only that, but chemotherapy doesn't even work well for all types of cancer.
5 minutes of research into chemo would have told you that, and yet you still posted that with the confident ignorance of a 19 year old white woman.
my bad, I got terms mixed up. what I described was radiation therapy.
Who's being disingenuous? I quoted exactly what you said in direct response to those exact words. I didn't want to do the whole thing because it was clunky, but I will quote the full context below because you are falsely accusing me of being a liar:
See that "them"? the one used directly after the list "Liars, murderers, rapists, and frauds", which implies that collection is encompassed by the catch-all word "them"? if you meant something else, you should have said so.
I was raised Christian, I am uncircumcised, and my disposition on Israel has ranged from indifference to contempt over the years. YHWH, Adonai, or whatever he's called in Judaism is a false god on par with Baal.
my thesis on Israel is that Israel is happy to sacrifice good people, including both Zionist and non-zionist jews, to play the propaganda game. they are setting up one of the greatest genocides of jews the world has ever seen (in addition to their current active genocides), and calling for the genocide of innocent Jews only helps Israel.
You literally added words in brackets into the quote. You quite literally put words in my mouth. Everyone on this board can see it. Trying to play semantics doesn't work here.
I will refer you to my previous post and please read it more thoroughly.
that is unless you have no idea how square brackets are used in quotes. square brackets indicate that the text inside are not part of the original quote, and instead contain context surrounding the quote. it's very standard to use them in both journalism and in academic papers.
this page has a good summary https://askus.library.wwu.edu/faq/116674