You don't think it should be a crime to breed humans with apes, experiment on babies' genes to see how they turn out or grow humans in a lab that have no emotions and can be used as cannon fodder? We have a natural disgust of deformed creatures and monkeying around with natural processes for a reason. Subversion of nature is also a slippery slope that we have to put strong guard rails around to prevent the commodification and degeneration of humanity.
We have a natural disgust of deformed creatures and monkeying around with natural processes for a reason.
The former premise is true only because we assume deformity = disease or genetic maladaptation, a judgement which was correct in most circumstances in the ancestral environment.
The latter premise is retarded. One of the earliest things humans did was selectively breed crops and animals for size, yield, and physical characteristics. We don't just not have an aversion, we have a predeliction for tampering with natural processes.
There's a huge difference between encouraging animals to breed that are already able to breed and forcing things to happen that biological processes specifically prevent from being possible. One is working with nature and the other is subverting it.
What biological processes exist to prevent us from choosing traits to pass on?
The only reason we can't is because reproduction is entirely chance based. Which sperm cell enters which prepared egg is absolutely random, and "choosing traits" is simply picking out precisely which pairs we want to form a zygote.
You know what, before that. How exactly do you think biology works? Do you understand how DNA is formed, how genes are expressed, how cells grow and reproduce? Because I'm not really getting the impression you are familiar with these processes, based on the statements you make.
experiment on babies' genes to see how they turn out or grow humans in a lab that have no emotions and can be used as cannon fodder?
These are acceptable, there is no purpose to crossing humans and apes, that experiment has already been done: see Africans.
There is no reason to condemn people to live their lives with crippling genetic diseases. The fact that christcucks like you want that is further proof that, at best, your god is a demon that enjoys torture. Humanities genetics need to be purified, and that starts with sorting embryos.
Humanities genetics need to be purified, and that starts with sorting embryos.
Do you extend that line of thought into any kind of “Technological Singularity” / “transhumanist” domains, or would you restrict it to effectively just sorting out “peak” humanity? Honest, and admittedly very broad question, just wondering what you see as reasonable
I AM a transhumanist. The problem I have with OpenAI, xAI, Microslop, and Google isn't the technology. It is who controls it. I have a problem with Alex Karp, Sam Altman, and all the techjeets. If it was controlled by someone who had loyalty to Whites it wouldn't be nearly so bad.
There is no such thing as a crime against nature, especially since nature spends all day trying to kill us.
You don't think it should be a crime to breed humans with apes, experiment on babies' genes to see how they turn out or grow humans in a lab that have no emotions and can be used as cannon fodder? We have a natural disgust of deformed creatures and monkeying around with natural processes for a reason. Subversion of nature is also a slippery slope that we have to put strong guard rails around to prevent the commodification and degeneration of humanity.
The former premise is true only because we assume deformity = disease or genetic maladaptation, a judgement which was correct in most circumstances in the ancestral environment.
The latter premise is retarded. One of the earliest things humans did was selectively breed crops and animals for size, yield, and physical characteristics. We don't just not have an aversion, we have a predeliction for tampering with natural processes.
There's a huge difference between encouraging animals to breed that are already able to breed and forcing things to happen that biological processes specifically prevent from being possible. One is working with nature and the other is subverting it.
What biological processes exist to prevent us from choosing traits to pass on?
The only reason we can't is because reproduction is entirely chance based. Which sperm cell enters which prepared egg is absolutely random, and "choosing traits" is simply picking out precisely which pairs we want to form a zygote.
You know what, before that. How exactly do you think biology works? Do you understand how DNA is formed, how genes are expressed, how cells grow and reproduce? Because I'm not really getting the impression you are familiar with these processes, based on the statements you make.
These are acceptable, there is no purpose to crossing humans and apes, that experiment has already been done: see Africans.
There is no reason to condemn people to live their lives with crippling genetic diseases. The fact that christcucks like you want that is further proof that, at best, your god is a demon that enjoys torture. Humanities genetics need to be purified, and that starts with sorting embryos.
Do you extend that line of thought into any kind of “Technological Singularity” / “transhumanist” domains, or would you restrict it to effectively just sorting out “peak” humanity? Honest, and admittedly very broad question, just wondering what you see as reasonable
I AM a transhumanist. The problem I have with OpenAI, xAI, Microslop, and Google isn't the technology. It is who controls it. I have a problem with Alex Karp, Sam Altman, and all the techjeets. If it was controlled by someone who had loyalty to Whites it wouldn't be nearly so bad.
I'm not even a Christian, retard