The Catholic Church had nothing on the religious zealotry of academia since the 50s. They conned and completely made up almost every social narrative that exists today while claiming some mystical data source that either never existed or was tortured into compliance. This is how sociology and “soft sciences” (pseudoscience) became the forefront of academia, they were placed there by both the neocons and the communists.
This is also why peer review instead of replication became widespread. Everyone argued it was cost, but it was always about creating ideological barriers. It’s also why pure nonsense gets published. Think of how many medical journals put out pure hit pieces during Covid over ivermectin and natural immunity, or how many put out TDS statements. There’s no integrity in science anymore and that’s why they’re terrified of public datasets. Covid datasets were the crack in the dam, people started realizing the experts had no clue what they were saying and were just regurgitating paid talking points and tried hiding data or flat out lied about the numbers.
The godless masses have tried to make science into a religion of "ultimate truth" but they don't want anyone to read the bible of replicable phenomenon 😂🤣
This was known in the 1970s. I have a book published then discussing how researchers were barred from researching certain topics and that science was censored... 50 years ago. It's obviously worse now.
The Catholic Church had nothing on the religious zealotry of academia since the 50s. They conned and completely made up almost every social narrative that exists today while claiming some mystical data source that either never existed or was tortured into compliance. This is how sociology and “soft sciences” (pseudoscience) became the forefront of academia, they were placed there by both the neocons and the communists.
This is also why peer review instead of replication became widespread. Everyone argued it was cost, but it was always about creating ideological barriers. It’s also why pure nonsense gets published. Think of how many medical journals put out pure hit pieces during Covid over ivermectin and natural immunity, or how many put out TDS statements. There’s no integrity in science anymore and that’s why they’re terrified of public datasets. Covid datasets were the crack in the dam, people started realizing the experts had no clue what they were saying and were just regurgitating paid talking points and tried hiding data or flat out lied about the numbers.
The godless masses have tried to make science into a religion of "ultimate truth" but they don't want anyone to read the bible of replicable phenomenon 😂🤣
"We will peer review it for you, goy"
That explains why they're also terrified of the vaccinated vs unvaccinated dataset
It's not happening.
Okay it is but it's a good thing.
This was known in the 1970s. I have a book published then discussing how researchers were barred from researching certain topics and that science was censored... 50 years ago. It's obviously worse now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolphe_Cr%C3%A9mieux
🤔
So I now know about papal jews, showing that the Catholics have been corrupt since at least 1326.
fucking lol
Well I'm pretty sure it's not the real Crémieux, and he's using a mocking caricature as his avatar, so I'm not sure whether he's a fan or a hater.