Yes, present immigration policies can be good even when you have a lot of pre-exisitng immigrants. I know you're aware of this because we discussed your own law in was it 1921 that banned or severely restricted immigration.
You may be an absurd character, but don't pretend to be more stupid than you are.
They stopped new influx. It hasn’t changed the fact Muslims are reproducing at a 2.5 times higher rate than the danish or that the danish are dying faster than births in total and like most European countries they are all older.
Immigrants are irrelevant to immigration?! You truly are just a leftist saying words because you think they’re magic.
Yes, present immigration policies can be good even when you have a lot of pre-exisitng immigrants. I know you're aware of this because we discussed your own law in was it 1921 that banned or severely restricted immigration.
You may be an absurd character, but don't pretend to be more stupid than you are.
They can? Last I checked Denmark is a whole 1% less Muslim than England despite “tough immigration policies” so where exactly is the success?
It's that they've mostly stopped the bleeding (meaning new inflow) and the rest of Europe hasn't.
They stopped new influx. It hasn’t changed the fact Muslims are reproducing at a 2.5 times higher rate than the danish or that the danish are dying faster than births in total and like most European countries they are all older.