Liberal Women Long for Combat with ICE
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
Yeah seeing half the women being dumbass ditz at best and batshit crazy at worst.. i understand how our ancestors saw batshit crazy hags as witches and burned them at the stakes. They werent burning rational, calm speaking motherly women. They were burning beligerent and insane woke women of that time.
Sean connery was right. Backhand once in a while if they get out of line.
Here is the problem with that. Back in 1910, slapping a woman who was acting out and misbehaving was just that, a correctional force. Today, that's an assault charge, possible jail time, and if you are in a relationship to that woman, domestic violence charges, your employment opportunities forever tainted, and your children possibly taken away from you.
This is the crux of why we as men have not been able to correct women's behavior, despite the fact that they as a group overwhelmingly show signs of not just needing, but wanting to be corrected. They voted to make it illegal with their shortsighted desire to gain power.
So now we get another instance of women being the cause of their own problems, and the solution to it being made illegal so the problem never gets solved. It has gotten so bad that men don't even want to help women when they get attacked, because they saw what happened to Daniel Penny. Women/libtards will argue that it doesn't matter because he didn't go to jail, which is not the point. The point is that he even got arrested and went to court in the first place for what should be a heroic act lauded by the masses. Daniel Penny's reward for his heroism was a year of legal fees and stress.
Men saw that, and more importantly, what they didn't see was a large scale female led protest demanding that he be freed. So they asked themselves, much like Bronn asked Tyrion when Tyrion needed a champion to fight the Mountain, why should they risk their lives and their future for people who wouldn't do the same for them?
This of course presents major problems for the future stability of this country, and major problems for the future of white people in general. If men are unable and/or unwilling to correct destructive female behavior, and instead live for themselves, then the civilization itself crumbles, as no new people are born, and the invaders from beyond our borders pour in to find no resistance.
The uncomfortable truth is that if we want to avoid this future, the men in this country are going to have to band together and use force in defiance of both women's mental instability, and the law itself. But getting men to work together at that scale without something worth dying for is like trying to herd cats. If they can't be convinced that it's worth their lives to fight for, we are doomed.
its just that history books seems to teach students that the witches were all just normal, stable, innocent women. yeah, maybe a few are. but no way to really tell since history has been written in such a way that hides it.
Perhaps you are right about those
Most benign cases of being a Karen/AWFL in medieval/renaissance times were punished being being tied and briefly dunked in a river for the crime of being a "Common scold", which was the name for them at the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_scold
^Has some nice woodcuts of the practice