See the title.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (74)
sorted by:
Well, they just tried to shoot him about a year ago. And before that they tried to throw him in prison. There are so many specific circumstances around Butler that you can't reasonably say it was staged.
If they wanted to actually throw him in prison, he would've been in prison. If they wanted him dead, he would be dead. Trump was already choking on Israeli dick during his first term. That shit did not start with his second term.
And yes I can reasonably say that both events are fishy as fuck. It's quite easy to stage an assassination attempt.
Fishy, yes. But the bullet was literally captured in flight and Trump's reactions don't betray any of the tells of performance. Also we know the shooter fired real bullets because people were hit.
More broadly, the Trump phenomenon has to be authentic to some large degree because it would simply be superior to the elite (all factions of them) to have Hillary, Kamala, or even Jeb or Nikki take the Oval Office, by ridiculous margins.
I don't dispute the fact that someone was shooting and killed that one audience member. I'm only skeptical about if Trump was actually the intended target.
That depends entirely on what they are trying to achieve. To convince Americans to die in another stupid desert war Trump is definitely the better choice.
You know that 4chan post about globohomo being dialed back to convince White men to go die in another war by the millions? I do think that's what's happening.
Do you dispute that a bullet skimmed the side of Trump's head?
At what point? If they stopped him from running in 2016, Hillary or Jeb could've easily pivoted us into a new war. At that time I and many others were still clinging to the idea that Iraq was worth it somehow. Trump was the guy who singlehandedly destroyed that idea. The only significant obstacle was logistics because we were still tied up in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, everything would be solidified in an nigh unbreakable neoliberal consensus on feminism, speech, immigration, etc. Either Hillary or Jeb are ridiculously superior choices.
2020 Trump obviously wanted to win and they obviously denied him. The viciousness he showed in the debates and the extraordinary measures they took to steal the election are proof of that. Then there was January 6. If you assert that all major players were putting on a kayfabe puppet show I don't really see how their movements could be scripted to be so spontaneous. To take just one point, Trump's lawyers made fools of themselves on national TV and then were censured, charged, flipped, convicted, and turned against him.
To what end would they stage the worst presidential election dispute in the nation's history? I suppose the answer would be "to further divide us" and I think that's pretty silly. Assuming everyone is in on it, if the goal is to ease off globohomo and get us into another war, then a clean Trump victory would have been a far better choice. (Moreover, Trump would have started selling neoconservatism a lot earlier.) If the goal is an efficient Great Replacement and a woke feminist tranny state, then a clean Biden victory is better. Mass civil unrest and stirring up the embers of a declining white population makes utterly no sense if both candidates are on the same team. But it does make sense if one of them actually wants to kill the other.
Which leads me to 2024. If all of the above is basically true, then Trump must have been flipped at some point between 2020 and now. I believe he made a deal with the Jewish mafia to essentially save himself at some point after January 6, and they are now calling the tune.