You don't follow that movement closely enough then. Charlottesville and the crackdown afterwards was a huge setback. James Fields has a million life sentences because of that. It was Trump's DOJ that piled on hate crime charges. Then there was the deplatforming.
The things you attribute to Trump happened in spite of him. White identity was going to start going mainstream in some form regardless. All the immigration and anti-White woke shit demanded it. What Trump did was co-opt it and attack the real movement.
What you see a lot of today is more like Azov. It's "White Nationalists and Nazis for ZOG" that are most prominent, i.e. Nick Fuentes. Thiel and Bannon created a fake version of the old "alt-right." Your Zionist, Ameriphile European right is an extension of that.
You don't follow that movement closely enough then. Charlottesville and the crackdown afterwards was a huge setback. James Fields has a million life sentences because of that. It was Trump's DOJ that piled on hate crime charges. Then there was the deplatforming.
I do remember that. And they were serious setbacks for the entire right. There was also the continuation of the Great Awokening.
The things you attribute to Trump happened in spite of him.
You can make a distinction between "this happened because of Trump" and "this happened because of the election of Trump". I think the two elections, and the one supposedly stolen, created a lot of populist energy which led to a lot of good things, often times in spite of Trump as you say.
White identity was going to start going mainstream in some form regardless. All the immigration and anti-White woke shit demanded it.
It's impossible to tell. But I'll grant you that for the sake of the argument. If the elites decide to shut that position out, it will be shut out. Do you know Enoch Powell? The vast majority of British agreed with him. And what happened? He was politically marginalized, because the elites did not like it.
Thiel and Bannon created a fake version of the old "alt-right." Your Zionist, Ameriphile European right is an extension of that.
Our European right existed long before Thiel and Bannon showed up. You may disagree with their positions, as I do, but they hold their positions for reasons completely unrelated to Bannon (who is now a critic of Israel btw).
The issue is that in most European countries, support for Israel and (usually) America increases monotonically the further right you go, whereas in America support for Israel is an upside-down V. People here are right-wingers because they don't like immigrants, particularly Islamic immigrants. Israel kills Muslims. They like that there's a country that deals firmly with that. If you criticize it, they will suspect that you do that out of sympathy for leftism or Muslims, rather than out of opposition to your political system being subverted to serve foreign interests.
So it's not even like the fantasies of some pop-right figures that if the GOP is destroyed, something better will take its place. It's this or the establishment.
You don't follow that movement closely enough then. Charlottesville and the crackdown afterwards was a huge setback. James Fields has a million life sentences because of that. It was Trump's DOJ that piled on hate crime charges. Then there was the deplatforming.
The things you attribute to Trump happened in spite of him. White identity was going to start going mainstream in some form regardless. All the immigration and anti-White woke shit demanded it. What Trump did was co-opt it and attack the real movement.
What you see a lot of today is more like Azov. It's "White Nationalists and Nazis for ZOG" that are most prominent, i.e. Nick Fuentes. Thiel and Bannon created a fake version of the old "alt-right." Your Zionist, Ameriphile European right is an extension of that.
I do remember that. And they were serious setbacks for the entire right. There was also the continuation of the Great Awokening.
You can make a distinction between "this happened because of Trump" and "this happened because of the election of Trump". I think the two elections, and the one supposedly stolen, created a lot of populist energy which led to a lot of good things, often times in spite of Trump as you say.
It's impossible to tell. But I'll grant you that for the sake of the argument. If the elites decide to shut that position out, it will be shut out. Do you know Enoch Powell? The vast majority of British agreed with him. And what happened? He was politically marginalized, because the elites did not like it.
Our European right existed long before Thiel and Bannon showed up. You may disagree with their positions, as I do, but they hold their positions for reasons completely unrelated to Bannon (who is now a critic of Israel btw).
The issue is that in most European countries, support for Israel and (usually) America increases monotonically the further right you go, whereas in America support for Israel is an upside-down V. People here are right-wingers because they don't like immigrants, particularly Islamic immigrants. Israel kills Muslims. They like that there's a country that deals firmly with that. If you criticize it, they will suspect that you do that out of sympathy for leftism or Muslims, rather than out of opposition to your political system being subverted to serve foreign interests.
So it's not even like the fantasies of some pop-right figures that if the GOP is destroyed, something better will take its place. It's this or the establishment.
I know of Enoch Powell. Today, the elites use controlled opposition to suck up all the air in the room to go along with the marginalization.
The Euro right is looking pretty useless. I guess you're going to have to wait for Trumpism to finish imploding before you can move forward.