It is an argument that just formed in my head, we have crazy investors and governments will exist no matter what. The question is what will be invested?
The perfect example of ALL "climate science" that we should trust unconditionally and without question : A mistake a high schooler would have caught on the first revision of his draft.
Left in, intentionally, to sell it to the Alarmists who fund them.
Fun fact: Nature & other "science magazines" like Scientific American, started out as rags as lurid & unbelievable as The National Enquirer. They shifted to serious science after WW1 (more or less) and now are devolved back to tabloids.
It is an argument that just formed in my head, we have crazy investors and governments will exist no matter what. The question is what will be invested?
Where is the actual paper and retraction? Man talks a lot, but doesn't actually give you anything useful.
https://x.com/thesurenk/status/2004237905837830181
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09726-0
Perfect, thanks kindly. I like to actually read these things before I commit to an opinion.
There's trillions at stake.
It's ALL a fairy tale.
Our governments and media are fully corrupt. They must be destroyed and rebuilt.
The perfect example of ALL "climate science" that we should trust unconditionally and without question : A mistake a high schooler would have caught on the first revision of his draft.
Left in, intentionally, to sell it to the Alarmists who fund them.
Fun fact: Nature & other "science magazines" like Scientific American, started out as rags as lurid & unbelievable as The National Enquirer. They shifted to serious science after WW1 (more or less) and now are devolved back to tabloids.
Let me know when Elon Musk loses his dirty money.